NCT04442854

Brief Summary

This study developed a culturally appropriate cognitive behavioral group prevention program for Mainland Chinese university students in Hong Kong. The effects of the group prevention program on psychological distress, acculturative stress, cognitions, emotions, and post-migration growth were examined.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2018

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Chinese university studentmental health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12)

    12 item rating scale measuring psychological distress, scale score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a higher level of psychological distress

    pre-test at intake interview

  • General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12)

    12 item rating scale measuring psychological distress, scale score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a higher level of psychological distress

    post-test at the end of the last session of the CBT group (for the experimental group), and when the experimental group finished the intervention (for the waitlist control group), respectively.

  • General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12)

    12 item rating scale measuring psychological distress, scale score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a higher level of psychological distress

    3-month follow-up test three months after completing the intervention

  • Acculturative Stress Scale for Chinese Students (ASSCS)

    35-item rating scale measuring acculturative stress, scale score ranges from 0-3, with a higher score indicating a higher level of acculturative stress

    pre-test at intake interview

  • Acculturative Stress Scale for Chinese Students (ASSCS)

    35-item rating scale measuring acculturative stress, scale score ranges from 0-3, with a higher score indicating a higher level of acculturative stress

    post-test at the end of the last session of the CBT group (for the experimental group), and when the experimental group finished the intervention (for the waitlist control group), respectively.

  • Acculturative Stress Scale for Chinese Students (ASSCS)

    35-item rating scale measuring acculturative stress, scale score ranges from 0-3, with a higher score indicating a higher level of acculturative stress

    3-month follow-up test three months after completing the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Chinese Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (CATQ)

    pre-test at intake interview

  • Chinese Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (CATQ)

    post-test at the end of the last session of the CBT group (for the experimental group), and when the experimental group finished the intervention (for the waitlist control group), respectively.

  • Chinese Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (CATQ)

    3-month follow-up test three months after completing the intervention

  • Post-migration Growth Scale (PMGS)

    pre-test at intake interview

  • Post-migration Growth Scale (PMGS)

    post-test at the end of the last session of the CBT group (for the experimental group), and when the experimental group finished the intervention (for the waitlist control group), respectively.

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

cognitive behavioral group therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

A cognitive behavioral group prevention program An 8-session, cognitive behavioral group prevention program, featuring cultural appropriateness. One session per week, 3 hours for each session. The program contents include psychoeducation, cognitive skills training to identify and challenge maladaptive cognitions, and behavioral skills training. Each session contains mood check and homework. Participants' own examples are used in the group to demonstrate the CBT skills.

Other: cognitive behavioral group therapy

Wait-list control group

NO INTERVENTION

No immediate intervention No intervention was provided when the experimental group was receiving services, but the same cognitive behavioral group prevention program was delivered to the wait-list control group after that.

Interventions

A 8-session cognitive behavior group intervention tailor-made for Mainland Chinese university students in Hong Kong

cognitive behavioral group therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Chinese students from Mainland China who were studying at local universities in Hong Kong
  • GHQ-12 score of 2 or above (0-0-1-1)
  • Willingness to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • GHQ-12 score of 11 or above (0-0-1-1)
  • One or more psychotic disorders
  • Severe depression diagnosed by professionals with suicidal attempts/ideation in the past 3 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jiayan Pan

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehavior

Study Officials

  • Jiayan Pan, PhD

    Hong Kong Baptist University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2020

First Posted

June 23, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

June 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 1, 2018

Last Updated

September 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations