Efficacy of Li-SWT on Persistent Storage Symptoms After Transurethral Surgery for BPO
Efficacy of Low-intensity Shock Wave Therapy on Persistent Storage Symptoms After Transurethral Surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
comparing the outcome of low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT) versus solifenacin on persistent storage symptoms after transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 21, 2022
CompletedJune 15, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.8 years
June 11, 2020
June 12, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
The percent change in overactive bladder symptoms score (OABSS)
The primary endpoint is the percent change from baseline in the total score of OABSS (total score = 15) at 3-month follow up.
approximately 20 months
Percent of responders
The percent of responders at 3-month follow up. Three points reduction in the total score of OABSS is determined as the minimal threshold for a meaningful change. Responders are defined as patients who achieved reduction in the total score of OABSS ≥ 3 at 3-month follow up, and those patients will continue on the same treatment modality.
approximately 20 months
The numerical change in overactive bladder symptoms score (OABSS)
The numerical change from baseline in the total score and sub-scores of OABSS at 3 and 6-month follow up will be reported.
approximately 2 years.
3-day voiding diary
Change in daytime frequency (times/24hrs), urgency (times/24hrs), urge incontinence (times/24hrs), nocturia (times/24hrs) and average voided volume/micturition (ml) from baseline will be compared at 3 and 6-month follow up.
approximately 2 years.
Incidence of adverse events associated with treatment
Incidence of adverse events associated with Li-SWT or solifenacin (n%) should be reported.
approximately 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
International index of prostate symptom score (IPSS)
approximately 2 years.
Post voiding residual urine (PVR)
approximately 2 years.
Maximum flow rate (Qmax)
approximately 2 years.
International index of erectile function-15 ( IIEF-15)
approximately 2 years.
Cystometric bladder capacity
approximately 2 years.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Li-SWT
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be treated by 8 sessions of Li-SWT with one week interval. This group is subdivided into 3 subgroups according to the approach through which Li-SWT is applied; suprapubic, perineal and combined approaches
Sham treatment
SHAM COMPARATORPatients will be treated by 8 sessions of sham treatment with one week interval, applied through suprapubic and perineal approaches.
antimuscarinics
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be treated by solifenacin 10 mg once daily for 6 months.
Interventions
The patient will be asked to lie in flat dorsal position. A commercially used gel for sonography will be applied to the suprapubic region. The applicator will be placed on suprapubic region with two fingers apart from the symphysis pubis tilting to 45°. Shock waves will be directed to 3 different sites; the midline (over the bladder dome) and 3 cm right and left to the midline (over bilateral bladder walls). The patient will receive 3000 shocks (1000 shocks per site) with energy flux density of 0.12 mJ/mm² and frequency of 4 Hz.
The patient will be asked to lie in lithotomy position. A commercially used gel for sonography will be applied to the perineum. The applicator will be placed on perineal region. Shock waves will be directed to 3 different sites: the midline and 2 cm above and below the midline. The patient will receive 3000 shocks (1000 shocks per site) with energy flux density of 0.12 mJ/mm² and frequency of 4 Hz.
The patient will receive 3000 shocks; 1500 shocks through suprapubic approach (500 shocks per site) and another 1500 shocks through perineal approach (500 shocks per site) with energy flux density of 0.12 mJ/mm² and frequency of 4 Hz.
The same technique of Li-SWT will be used but the applicator of the shock wave device will be turned off.
The patients will be treated by antimuscarinics (solifenacin) which are considered as the conventional treatment of storage symptoms after prostatectomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients have to fulfill all the following criteria to be included in the study:
- Ability to give informed consent and reply to questionnaires.
- Average urgency episodes per 24 hrs ≥ 1 and average daytime frequency ≥ 8 during the baseline 3-day voiding diary.
- Relief of BOO as proved by non-invasive uroflowmetry, pressure flow study (PFS) or urethrocystoscopy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have any of the following will be excluded from the study:
- Untreated UTI.
- BOO such as bladder neck contracture (BNC), residual obstructing adenoma or urethral stricture.
- Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Depression or any psychogenic disorders.
- Prior radiation therapy to the pelvic area.
- History of prostate cancer, bladder tumor or intravesical Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) therapy.
- Poor coagulopathy.
- Severe cardiovascular disease.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mansoura Universitylead
- Ahmed Mohamed Elshalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Urology and Nephrology center
Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammed Hegazy
Urology and nephrology center, Mansoura, Egypt
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohamed Gaballah
Urology and nephrology center, Mansoura, Egypt
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Khaled Sheir
Urology and nephrology center, Mansoura, Egypt
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ahmed Elshal
Urology and nephrology center, Mansoura, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer of urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2020
First Posted
June 18, 2020
Study Start
July 4, 2020
Primary Completion
April 12, 2022
Study Completion
July 21, 2022
Last Updated
June 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06