NCT04434664

Brief Summary

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a critical public health problem. Heart failure (HF) affects over 5 million adults in the United States (US), and is a major source of morbidity, mortality, and impaired quality of life. Approximately half of individuals with HF have a preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), termed HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). While there are several effective pharmacologic therapies for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), none have been identified for HFpEF. Hypertension, which is present in approximately 80% of individuals with HFpEF, is the foremost modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of HFpEF. Despite the clinical importance of hypertension in HFpEF, there is limited information on how common antihypertensive agents, particularly calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and β-blockers, effect pathophysiologic mechanisms of HFpEF. This is a mechanistic investigation of the role of dihydropyridine CCBs compared to β-blockers (commonly used antihypertensive agents in clinical practice) in targeting key physiologic abnormalities in HFpEF.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2021

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2020

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 3, 2024

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 30, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 30, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 10, 2020

Results QC Date

November 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Calcium channel blockerBeta-blocker

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in Home Systolic Blood Pressure

    The difference in home systolic blood pressure between treatments was determined using a single summary value per participant per intervention period, calculated as the mean of all available home systolic BP readings obtained during the final week of each intervention period. Home BP monitoring was performed using the same validated device model (Microlife BP 3MX1-4 WatchBP Home N), with three consecutive measurements taken in the morning and evening each day over the seven-day period.

    Measured during the last week of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Difference in Home Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Measured during the last week of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

  • Difference in Office Systolic Blood Pressure

    Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

  • Difference in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

  • Difference in Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2) During a Maximal Exercise Test

    Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

  • Difference in Quality of Life

    Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Amlodipine besylate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Initial dose 5mg (1 capsule) daily, titrated up to 10mg (2 capsules) daily for a home systolic BP ≥135 mmHg and heart rate ≥50 bpm after the first week of use

Drug: Amlodipine Besylate

Metoprolol succinate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Initial dose 100mg (1 capsule) daily, titrated up to 200mg (2 capsules) daily for a home systolic BP ≥135 mmHg and heart rate ≥50 bpm after the first week of use

Drug: Metoprolol Succinate

Interventions

The interventions will be implemented in random order in a crossover (AB-BA) design, separated by an approximately one-week washout period

Amlodipine besylate

The interventions will be implemented in random order in a crossover (AB-BA) design, separated by an approximately one-week washout period

Metoprolol succinate

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults age 18-90 years
  • Diagnosis of hypertension defined by at least two of the following: A) ICD-9 (401.0-404.91) or ICD-10 (I10-I13) codes signifying hypertension; B) Treatment with antihypertensive medication other than a loop diuretic for at least two months; C) History of previous blood pressure readings ≥130/80 mmHg at two separate office visits
  • Stable antihypertensive therapy; defined as no changes in antihypertensive medications in the preceding 30 days
  • A diagnosis of heart failure
  • LV ejection fraction \>50%
  • Elevated filling pressures defined by at least one of the following criteria: A) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) \>8 with low e' velocity (septal e' \<7 cm/s or lateral e' \<10 cm/s) and at least one of the following: a. Enlarged left atrium (LA volume index \>34 ml/m2); b. Chronic loop diuretic use for management of symptoms; c. Elevated natriuretic peptides (BNP levels \>100 ng/L or NT-proBNP levels \>300 ng/L); B) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) \>14; C) Previously elevated invasively determined filling pressures based on one of the following criteria: a. Resting LVEDP \>16 mmHg; b. Mean PCWP \>12 mmHg; c. PCWP or LVEDP ≥25 mmHg with exercise; D) Previous acutely decompensated heart failure requiring IV diuretics;

You may not qualify if:

  • Systolic BP meeting any of the following criteria: A) Current office systolic BP \<100 mmHg; B) Current office systolic BP 100-119 mmHg if not receiving treatment with an antihypertensive agent or if holding antihypertensive medication prior to randomization would be clinically contraindicated, as per the investigator's clinical judgement; C) Current office systolic BP ≥180 mmHg if not receiving treatment with a CCB or β-blocker, or ≥160 mmHg if already receiving a CCB and/or β-blocker prior to the pre-randomization wash-out period; D) Orthostatic hypotension defined as \>20 mmHg decline in office systolic BP 3-5 minutes following the transition from sitting to standing position
  • Resting heart rate \<50 or \>100 bpm
  • Contraindication to withholding CCB or β-blocker therapy (e.g. use of non-dihydropyridine CCB \[diltiazem or verapamil\] or β-blocker for rate control for atrial fibrillation) as per the investigator's clinical judgement
  • Children, fetuses, neonates, prisoners, and pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo a pregnancy test during the screening visit) are not included in this research study.
  • Inability/unwillingness to exercise
  • Any the following echocardiographic findings: A) LV ejection fraction \<45% on any prior echocardiogram, unless it was in the setting of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation; B) Hypertrophic, infiltrative, or inflammatory cardiomyopathy; C) Clinically significant pericardial disease, as per investigator judgment; D) Moderate or greater left-sided valvular disease, any degree of mitral stenosis, or prosthetic mitral valve; E) Severe right-sided valvular disease; F) Severe right ventricular dysfunction
  • Active coronary artery disease, defined as any of the following: A) Acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention in the past 2 months; B) Ischemia on stress testing without either subsequent revascularization or a subsequent angiogram demonstrating the absence of clinically significant epicardial coronary artery disease, as per investigator judgement
  • Clinically significant lung disease, defined as any of the following: A) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease meeting GOLD criteria stage III or greater; B) Treatment with oral steroids within the past 6 months for an exacerbation of obstructive lung disease; C) The use of daytime supplemental oxygen
  • Primary pulmonary arteriopathy
  • eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2
  • Any medical condition that, under the investigator's discretion, will interfere with safe completion of the study or validity of the endpoint assessments
  • Known history of an allergy or clinically significant sensitivity (as determined by the investigator) to either amlodipine besylate or metoprolol succinate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Cohen JB, Schrauben SJ, Zhao L, Basso MD, Cvijic ME, Li Z, Yarde M, Wang Z, Bhattacharya PT, Chirinos DA, Prenner S, Zamani P, Seiffert DA, Car BD, Gordon DA, Margulies K, Cappola T, Chirinos JA. Clinical Phenogroups in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Detailed Phenotypes, Prognosis, and Response to Spironolactone. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;8(3):172-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.009. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

    PMID: 31926856BACKGROUND
  • Chirinos JA, Kips JG, Jacobs DR Jr, Brumback L, Duprez DA, Kronmal R, Bluemke DA, Townsend RR, Vermeersch S, Segers P. Arterial wave reflections and incident cardiovascular events and heart failure: MESA (Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 20;60(21):2170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.054. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

    PMID: 23103044BACKGROUND
  • Chirinos JA, Segers P. Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular afterload: part 1: pressure and flow measurements and basic principles of wave conduction and reflection. Hypertension. 2010 Oct;56(4):555-62. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157321. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

    PMID: 20733089BACKGROUND
  • Chirinos JA, Segers P. Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular afterload: part 2: arterial pressure-flow and pressure-volume relations in humans. Hypertension. 2010 Oct;56(4):563-70. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157339. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

    PMID: 20733088BACKGROUND
  • Zamani P, Rawat D, Shiva-Kumar P, Geraci S, Bhuva R, Konda P, Doulias PT, Ischiropoulos H, Townsend RR, Margulies KB, Cappola TP, Poole DC, Chirinos JA. Effect of inorganic nitrate on exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):371-80; discussion 380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012957. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

    PMID: 25533966BACKGROUND
  • Zamani P, Tan V, Soto-Calderon H, Beraun M, Brandimarto JA, Trieu L, Varakantam S, Doulias PT, Townsend RR, Chittams J, Margulies KB, Cappola TP, Poole DC, Ischiropoulos H, Chirinos JA. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inorganic Nitrate in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circ Res. 2017 Mar 31;120(7):1151-1161. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309832. Epub 2016 Dec 7.

    PMID: 27927683BACKGROUND
  • Muntner P, Shimbo D, Carey RM, Charleston JB, Gaillard T, Misra S, Myers MG, Ogedegbe G, Schwartz JE, Townsend RR, Urbina EM, Viera AJ, White WB, Wright JT Jr. Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):e35-e66. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087.

    PMID: 30827125BACKGROUND
  • White WB, Krishnan S, Giacco S, Mallareddy M. Effects of metoprolol succinate extended release vs. amlodipine besylate on the blood pressure, heart rate, and the rate-pressure product in patients with hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 Sep-Oct;2(5):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

    PMID: 20409919BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Interventions

AmlodipineMetoprolol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DihydropyridinesPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPhenoxypropanolaminesPropanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPropanolsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

Sample size; while the study was adequately powered for the primary outcome, the small sample size yielded imbalance in some baseline characteristics and limits the ability to draw conclusions from the secondary outcomes.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jordana Cohen, MD, MSCE
Organization
University of Pennsylvania

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
For blinding, tablets are placed into oral gelatin capsules with an inert filler (lactose monohydrate). Blinding is performed and maintained by the University of Pennsylvania Investigational Drug Service.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2020

First Posted

June 17, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 3, 2024

Study Completion

December 20, 2024

Last Updated

January 30, 2026

Results First Posted

January 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations