Extubation in Pediatric Patients: Proactive or Passive?
Which is the Better Choice for Extubation in Pediatric Patients: Proactive or Passive?
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Smooth extubation process can reduce the complications in recovery time. This study aimed to investigate what is the better time to extubation when children is breathing spontaneously and adequately: waiting until children have movements or wakefulness (passive extubation)or removing endotracheal tube directly (proactive tracheal extubation).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 31, 2023
January 1, 2023
5 months
May 3, 2020
January 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Coughing
1 if a single cough occurred and saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≥95%; 2 if multiple coughs occurred and SpO2 ≥95%; 3 if multiple coughs occurred and SpO2 \<95%; and 4 if multiple coughs occurred, SpO2 \<95%, and coughing required administration of i.v . medication.
at the time of extubation within 1 minute
Respiratory complications
the number of patients who had gagging, clenched teeth, gross purposeful movements, breath holding, laryngospasm, or desaturation to SpO2\<90%
During the time when patients stayed in PACU after extubation, an average of 45 min
Time to spontaneous eye opening
Time to spontaneous eye opening
The time from PACU arrival to spontaneous eye opening, an average of 45 min
Time to discharge from PACU
Time to discharge from PACU
The time from patients arrived PACU to who was decided to discharge from PACU,an average of 1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Time to extubation
The time from PACU arrival to tracheal extubation, an average of 30 min
End-tidal concentration of minimum effective alveolar anesthetic concentration
The time before patients were decided to extubate, within 1 minute
Age
6 hours before intervention
Weight
6 hours before intervention
Height
6 hours before intervention
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
group A
ACTIVE COMPARATORchildren were extubated in a light plane of anesthesia, when they are still asleep or have swallowing reflex.
group B
NO INTERVENTIONTracheal extubation was performed when the patient regained consciousness, facial grimace, spontaneous eye opening, and purposeful arm movement.
Interventions
when children is breathing spontaneously and adequately in PACU,endotracheal tube was removed directly
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status aged 3-7 years
You may not qualify if:
- a suspected difficult airway reactive airway disease, recent upper respiratory tract infection gastrointestinal reflux obesity (body mass index\>30 kg/m2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Anesthesiology Department of Affiliated Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200031, China
Related Publications (6)
Tsukamoto M, Hitosugi T, Yokoyama T. Comparison of recovery in pediatric patients: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3653-3656. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02993-y. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
PMID: 31273527BACKGROUNDBidwai AV, Bidwai VA, Rogers CR, Stanley TH. Blood-pressure and pulse-rate responses to endotracheal extubation with and without prior injection of lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1979 Aug;51(2):171-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197908000-00020. No abstract available.
PMID: 453622BACKGROUNDValley RD, Freid EB, Bailey AG, Kopp VJ, Georges LS, Fletcher J, Keifer A. Tracheal extubation of deeply anesthetized pediatric patients: a comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2003 May;96(5):1320-1324. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000058844.77403.16.
PMID: 12707126BACKGROUNDGonzalez RM, Bjerke RJ, Drobycki T, Stapelfeldt WH, Green JM, Janowitz MJ, Clark M. Prevention of endotracheal tube-induced coughing during emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1994 Oct;79(4):792-5. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199410000-00030. No abstract available.
PMID: 7943794RESULTFan Q, Hu C, Ye M, Shen X. Dexmedetomidine for tracheal extubation in deeply anesthetized adult patients after otologic surgery: a comparison with remifentanil. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul 23;15:106. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0088-7.
PMID: 26202786RESULTInomata S, Yaguchi Y, Taguchi M, Toyooka H. End-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal extubation (MACEX) in adults: comparison with isoflurane. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jun;82(6):852-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.6.852.
PMID: 10562778RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2020
First Posted
June 16, 2020
Study Start
July 10, 2020
Primary Completion
December 14, 2020
Study Completion
April 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share