Comparison of the Functional Outcome of Site Peroneus Longus Graft Donors With and Without Distal Stump Suturing of Peroneus Tendon Brevis on ACL Reconstruction Case in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in Jakarta With 24 Patient as Subject Who Will Divide Into 2 Group.

NCT04431063 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: 18-10-1173
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 24
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Injury of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) is one of the most common sports injuries. The incidence rate reaches 68.6 cases per 100,000 people per year. Management of ACL injuries for individuals who want to return to the level of exercise activity as before, mostly in the form of reconstructive surgery. As many as 60,000 to 175,000 cases of ACL reconstruction per year are carried out in the United States At present, many reconstructive surgeries are performed by taking tendon grafts on the patient's own body (autograft) to then be used instead of the ACL. The most widely used graft sources are Hamstring and Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) grafts. Other alternative grafts are Quadriceps tendon, Fascia Lata, Iliotibial Band, and Peroneus Longus Tendon. Each graft retrieval technique has advantages and disadvantages. BPTB graft has the best tensile strength and bone union with bone, but the complications of anterior knee pain are also quite common (5-55%). Hamstring grafts and Quadriceps grafts minimize the complications of anterior knee pain, with fairly good tensile strength, but the union of grafts with bone takes longer. The loss of Hamstring tendons also causes a decrease in muscle strength in Hamstring, where Hamstring has an important role in preventing the anterior translation of the tibia Peroneus Longus Tendon graft is an alternative graft developed to minimize complications associated with graft use from the area around the knee. Peroneus Longus tendons also have tensile strength similar to Hamstring tendons. As with other graft extracts, Peroneus Longus tendon graft is also accompanied by complications in the donor site. Possible complications arising from the loss of the Peroneus Longus tendon include ankle instability and decreased flexion strength of the 1st ray and ankle eversion. Research carried out by Bancha et al showed a reduction in flexion strength of 1st ray and ankle eversion significantly, without any instability in the ankle. Peroneus longus provides 5.5% strength for moderate dorsiflexion for ankle eversion movements, peroneus longus is the main muscle. But in other studies it is said that the use of peroneus longus graft does not interfere with the stability of the ankle and ROM. Does not even affect the functional outcome of the ankle However, in a study conducted by Bancha et al and Kerimoglu et al., The technique used for taking Peroneus Longus graft tendons did not include suturing in the distal stump of Peroneous Longus. So with this study, researchers wanted to find out whether different results would be found related to donor site complications if the technique used included suturing the distal stump of the Peroneus Longus tendon against the peroneus brevis tendon

Conditions

Rupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Keywords

ACL; Rupture of ACL; Donor site; Peroneus Longus Graft; Distal Stump; Peroneus Brevis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

• Preoperative hand dynamometer value

  Value of objective measurement of the strength of the medial part of the plantarflexion in the one metatarsal head with the hand of the Dynamometer when the patient is supine. The measurement is done 3 times and the value used is the average of the 3 times the measurement. Healthy ankles were also examined as a comparison with the same measurement method. There is no minimum and maximum value, and the higher value the better the outcome

  This measurement was carried out at the preoperative setting

• Three-months postoperative hand dynamometer value

  Value of objective measurement of the strength of the medial part of the plantarflexion in the one metatarsal head with the hand of the Dynamometer when the patient is supine. The measurement is done 3 times and the value used is the average of the 3 times the measurement. Healthy ankles were also examined as a comparison with the same measurement method. There is no minimum and maximum value, and the higher value the better the outcome

  This measurement was carried out at 3 months postoperatively

• Six-months postoperative hand dynamometer value

  Value of objective measurement of the strength of the medial part of the plantarflexion in the one metatarsal head with the hand of the Dynamometer when the patient is supine. The measurement is done 3 times and the value used is the average of the 3 times the measurement. Healthy ankles were also examined as a comparison with the same measurement method. There is no minimum and maximum value, and the higher value the better the outcome

  This measurement was carried out at 6 months postoperatively

• Preoperative Clark's Angle Value

  the value of the objective angle measurement on the footprint by drawing a line from the medial side of the one metatarsal head and the heel against the second line which is connecting the one metatrsal head and the peak of the medial longitudinal arch. Clarke Angle of \< 31° means there is tendency to flatness and/or pronation. angle of 31° to \< 45° is the normal range. Clarke Angle of \> 45° means there is tendency to cavus foot

  This measurement was carried out at the preoperative setting

• Three-months Clark's Angle Value

  the value of the objective angle measurement on the footprint by drawing a line from the medial side of the one metatarsal head and the heel against the second line which is connecting the one metatrsal head and the peak of the medial longitudinal arch. Clarke Angle of \< 31° means there is tendency to flatness and/or pronation. angle of 31° to \< 45° is the normal range. Clarke Angle of \> 45° means there is tendency to cavus foot

  This measurement was carried out at the 3 months postoperatively

• Six-months Clark's Angle Value

  the value of the objective angle measurement on the footprint by drawing a line from the medial side of the one metatarsal head and the heel against the second line which is connecting the one metatrsal head and the peak of the medial longitudinal arch. Clarke Angle of \< 31° means there is tendency to flatness and/or pronation. angle of 31° to \< 45° is the normal range. Clarke Angle of \> 45° means there is tendency to cavus foot

  This measurement was carried out at the 6 months postoperatively

• Preoperative the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)

  the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AOFAS score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible

  Examination carried out 4 times for each patient in preoperative setting

• Three months postoperative the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)

  the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AOFAS score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible

  Examination carried out 4 times for each patient in 3 months postoperatively

• Six months postoperative the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)

  the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AOFAS score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible

  Examination carried out 4 times for each patient in 6 months postoperatively

• Preoperative visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA)

  the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. VAS-FA score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible

  Examination carried out 4 times for each patient at preoperative setting

• Three-months postoperative visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA)

  the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AS-FA score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible

  Examination carried out 4 times for each patient at 3 months postoperatively

• Six-months postoperative visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA)

  the questionnaire for assessing the function of both injured feet and ankles and the knee that is in the process of healing. AS-FA score has the range of value of 0 to 100. 0 is the worst value and 100 is the best value possible

  Examination carried out 4 times for each patient at 6 months postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Sutured Stump

EXPERIMENTAL

The group consist of subject with distal stump suturing of perobeus longus agains peroneus brevis in ACL Reconstruction Case

Procedure: Distal Stump Suturing

Unsutured Stump

NO INTERVENTION

The group consist of subject without distal stump suturing of peroneus longus agains peroneus brevis in ACL Reconstruction Case

Interventions

Distal Stump Suturing PROCEDURE

in ACL Reconstruction case , Group A consist of subject with operation procedure suturing the distal stump peroneus longus against the peroneus brevis in ACL reconstruction using the peroneus longus autograft.

Sutured Stump

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Patients with total ACL rupture using peroneus longus graft
• The suturing procedure for the distal stump peroneus longus against the peroneus brevis tendon is performed by orthopedic specialists or resident chiefs who have been given training in advance.

You may not qualify if:

• Osteoarthtis Knee Kellgren-Lawrence III and IV
• Osteoarthtis Knee Kellgren-Lawrence III and IV
• Flatfoot as evidenced by physical examination and footprinting

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Indonesia University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital

Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 14250, Indonesia

Location

Related Publications (31)

• Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2321-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00539.

  PMID: 19797565 BACKGROUND

• Angthong C, Chernchujit B, Apivatgaroon A, Chaijenkit K, Nualon P, Suchao-in K. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with the Peroneus Longus Tendon: A Biomechanical and Clinical Evaluation of the Donor Ankle Morbidity. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jun;98(6):555-60.

  PMID: 26219159 BACKGROUND

• Cerulli G, Placella G, Sebastiani E, Tei MM, Speziali A, Manfreda F. ACL Reconstruction: Choosing the Graft. Joints. 2013 Jun 12;1(1):18-24. eCollection 2013 Mar.

  PMID: 25606507 BACKGROUND

• Kerimoglu S, Aynaci O, Saracoglu M, Aydin H, Turhan AU. [Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008 Jan-Feb;42(1):38-43. doi: 10.3944/aott.2008.038. Turkish.

  PMID: 18354276 BACKGROUND

• Silver RL, de la Garza J, Rang M. The myth of muscle balance. A study of relative strengths and excursions of normal muscles about the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 May;67(3):432-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.67B3.3997956.

  PMID: 3997956 BACKGROUND

• Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS. A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):331-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907797.

  PMID: 20660401 BACKGROUND

• Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Adair B, Pua YH, Williams GP, McGaw R, Clark RA. Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140822. eCollection 2015.

  PMID: 26509265 BACKGROUND

• Click Fenter P, Bellew JW, Pitts T, Kay R. A comparison of 3 hand-held dynamometers used to measure hip abduction strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Aug;17(3):531-5. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)0172.0.co;2.

  PMID: 12930182 BACKGROUND

• Surburg PR, Suomi R, Poppy WK. Validity and reliability of a hand-held dynamometer with two populations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(5):229-34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.229.

  PMID: 18796754 BACKGROUND

• Murley GS, Tan JM, Edwards RM, De Luca J, Munteanu SE, Cook JL. Foot posture is associated with morphometry of the peroneus longus muscle, tibialis anterior tendon, and Achilles tendon. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Jun;24(3):535-41. doi: 10.1111/sms.12025. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

  PMID: 23301865 BACKGROUND

• Pita-Fernandez S, Gonzalez-Martin C, Seoane-Pillado T, Lopez-Calvino B, Pertega-Diaz S, Gil-Guillen V. Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older. J Epidemiol. 2015;25(2):148-54. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140082. Epub 2014 Nov 8.

  PMID: 25382154 BACKGROUND

• Gonzalez-Martin C, Pita-Fernandez S, Seoane-Pillado T, Lopez-Calvino B, Pertega-Diaz S, Gil-Guillen V. Variability between Clarke's angle and Chippaux-Smirak index for the diagnosis of flat feet. Colomb Med (Cali). 2017 Mar 30;48(1):25-31.

  PMID: 28559643 BACKGROUND

• Quatman CE, Hewett TE. The anterior cruciate ligament injury controversy: is "valgus collapse" a sex-specific mechanism? Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43(5):328-35. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.059139. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

  PMID: 19372087 BACKGROUND

• McGuine TA, Winterstein AP, Carr K, Hetzel S. Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life and Knee Function After Knee Injury in Young Female Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Apr 22;2(4):2325967114530988. doi: 10.1177/2325967114530988. eCollection 2014 Apr.

  PMID: 26535324 BACKGROUND

• Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):1579-602. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279913.

  PMID: 16199611 BACKGROUND

• Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1751-67. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279922.

  PMID: 16230470 BACKGROUND

• Mihelic R, Jurdana H, Jotanovic Z, Madjarevic T, Tudor A. Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17-20 years. Int Orthop. 2011 Jul;35(7):1093-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1206-x. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

  PMID: 21287172 BACKGROUND

• Schindler OS. Surgery for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: a historical perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):5-47. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1756-x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

  PMID: 22105976 BACKGROUND

• Felmet G. Implant-free press-fit fixation for bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction: 10-year results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Aug;130(8):985-92. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1050-2. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

  PMID: 20094723 BACKGROUND

• Willis-Owen CA, Hearn TC, Keene GC, Costi JJ. Biomechanical testing of implant free wedge shaped bone block fixation for bone patellar tendon bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a bovine model. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010 Sep 2;5:66. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-5-66.

  PMID: 20813059 BACKGROUND

• Pavlik A, Hidas P, Tallay A, Toman J, Berkes I. Femoral press-fit fixation technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: a prospective clinical evaluation of 285 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):220-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279920. Epub 2005 Oct 6.

  PMID: 16210575 BACKGROUND

• Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Schneider T, Bruggemann GP, Koebke J. Biomechanical testing of quadriceps tendon-patellar bone grafts: an alternative graft source for press-fit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 May;126(4):265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0048-7. Epub 2005 Sep 17.

  PMID: 16172862 BACKGROUND

• van Eck CF, Kropf EJ, Romanowski JR, Lesniak BP, Tranovich MJ, van Dijk CN, Fu FH. Factors that influence the intra-articular rupture pattern of the ACL graft following single-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Aug;19(8):1243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1427-y. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

  PMID: 21311861 BACKGROUND

• Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M, Lo Presti M, Giordano G, Iacono F, Neri MP. Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x. Epub 2006 Aug 15.

  PMID: 16909301 BACKGROUND

• Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD005960. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005960.pub2.

  PMID: 21901700 BACKGROUND

• Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):2-11. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310011501.

  PMID: 12531750 BACKGROUND

• Lee YH, Kuroda R, Zhao J, Chan KM. A tale of 10 European centres - 2010 APOSSM travelling fellowship review in ACL surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012 Jul 28;4(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-27.

  PMID: 22839644 BACKGROUND

• van Dijk PA, Lubberts B, Verheul C, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GM. Rehabilitation after surgical treatment of peroneal tendon tears and ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1165-74. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3944-6. Epub 2016 Jan 23.

  PMID: 26803783 BACKGROUND

• Lin TW, Cardenas L, Soslowsky LJ. Biomechanics of tendon injury and repair. J Biomech. 2004 Jun;37(6):865-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.11.005.

  PMID: 15111074 BACKGROUND

• Yang G, Rothrauff BB, Tuan RS. Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: clinical relevance and developmental paradigm. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2013 Sep;99(3):203-222. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21041.

  PMID: 24078497 BACKGROUND

• Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1502-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

  PMID: 26920430 RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Knee Injuries; Leg Injuries; Wounds and Injuries

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: QUADRUPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 3, 2020
• First Posted: June 16, 2020
• Study Start: December 1, 2018
• Primary Completion: December 1, 2021
• Study Completion: June 30, 2022
• Last Updated: May 23, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Locations

ID (1)