NCT04428905

Brief Summary

This phase III trial studies how well a telehealth self-management program works in improving survivorship care and outcomes in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer or colorectal cancer survivors. Survivor self-management program focuses on coaching patients on follow-up care after cancer treatments. Participating in the program may improve knowledge and confidence about follow-up care, communication with cancer care and primary care doctors, and quality of life after cancer treatment in non-small cell lung cancer or colorectal cancer survivors.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
403

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
11mo left

Started Jul 2020

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress87%
Jul 2020Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 26, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 11, 2020

Completed
6.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2027

Last Updated

February 24, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6.7 years

First QC Date

May 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

  • Care coordination

    To test the short and long term effects of the intervention on care coordination (timely appointments and care, use of information to coordinate care, support in managing treatment effects, provides timely information, involvement of family and friends), a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance in which the within groups variables are care coordination scores as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Cancer Care Survey at baseline. The between groups measures are the comparisons between 1) study arms, attention control versus intervention, and 2) cancer type, non-small cell lung cancer versus colorectal cancer, with at minimum the baseline care coordination score serving as a covariate. Other covariates may be added to the model pending results of the preliminary analysis. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Cancer Care Survey, Minimum value = 1 Never ; maximum value = 4 Always, higher is better.

    At Baseline

  • Care coordination

    To test the short and long term effects of the intervention on care coordination (timely appointments and care, use of information to coordinate care, support in managing treatment effects, provides timely information, involvement of family and friends), a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance in which the within groups variables are care coordination scores as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Cancer Care Survey at 4 months. The between groups measures are the comparisons between 1) study arms, attention control versus intervention, and 2) cancer type, non-small cell lung cancer versus colorectal cancer, with at minimum the baseline care coordination score serving as a covariate. Other covariates may be added to the model pending results of the preliminary analysis. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Cancer Care Survey, Minimum value = 1 Never ; maximum value = 4 Always, higher is better.

    At 4 months

  • Care coordination

    To test the short and long term effects of the intervention on care coordination (timely appointments and care, use of information to coordinate care, support in managing treatment effects, provides timely information, involvement of family and friends), a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance in which the within groups variables are care coordination scores as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Cancer Care Survey at 8 months. The between groups measures are the comparisons between 1) study arms, attention control versus intervention, and 2) cancer type, non-small cell lung cancer versus colorectal cancer, with at minimum the baseline care coordination score serving as a covariate. Other covariates may be added to the model pending results of the preliminary analysis. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Cancer Care Survey, Minimum value = 1 Never ; maximum value = 4 Always, higher is better.

    At 8 months

  • Oncologist/primary care providers (PCP) communication

    To test the effect of the intervention on improved communication among oncologists and PCP, a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance (AofC) will be used to test for differences on the perceived quality of care coordination and communication by the oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs) treating patients in the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) at baseline (within group). Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors; minimum value=never; maximum value=always/almost always; higher is better

    At Baseline

  • Oncologist/primary care providers (PCP) communication

    To test the effect of the intervention on improved communication among oncologists and PCP, a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance (AofC) will be used to test for differences on the perceived quality of care coordination and communication by the oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs) treating patients in the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) at 4 months (within group). Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors; minimum value=never; maximum value=always/almost always; higher is better

    At 4 months

  • Oncologist/primary care providers (PCP) communication

    To test the effect of the intervention on improved communication among oncologists and PCP, a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance (AofC) will be used to test for differences on the perceived quality of care coordination and communication by the oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs) treating patients in the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) at 8 months (within group). Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors; minimum value=never; maximum value=always/almost always; higher is better

    At 8 months

  • PCP knowledge in survivorship care

    To test the short and long term effects of the intervention on improved knowledge in survivorship care among primary care providers, a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance will be conducted to compare the outcome for the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) and over time (within groups) with baseline knowledge scores serving as the primary covariate. Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors; minimum value=never; maximum value=always/almost always; higher is better

    At Baseline

  • PCP knowledge in survivorship care

    To test the short and long term effects of the intervention on improved knowledge in survivorship care among primary care providers, a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance will be conducted to compare the outcome for the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) and over time (within groups) with baseline knowledge scores serving as the primary covariate. Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors; minimum value=never; maximum value=always/almost always; higher is better

    At 4 months

  • PCP knowledge in survivorship care

    To test the short and long term effects of the intervention on improved knowledge in survivorship care among primary care providers, a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance will be conducted to compare the outcome for the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) and over time (within groups) with baseline knowledge scores serving as the primary covariate. Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors; minimum value=never; maximum value=always/almost always; higher is better

    At 8 months

  • Survivor outcomes

    Will compare the two arms to determine the efficacy of the intervention on survivor outcomes and analyze using a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance. By diagnosis, differences between the attention control and intervention arm participants on responses to the Confidence in Survivorship Information survey measuring patients' knowledge of and self-efficacy in survivorship care will be examined at baseline into the study, controlling for baseline scores on the Confidence in Survivorship Information survey. Confidence in cancer Survivorship: minimum value=strongly disagree; maximum value=strongly agree; higher is better

    At Baseline

  • Survivor outcomes

    Will compare the two arms to determine the efficacy of the intervention on survivor outcomes and analyze using a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance. By diagnosis, differences between the attention control and intervention arm participants on responses to the Confidence in Survivorship Information survey measuring patients' knowledge of and self-efficacy in survivorship care will be examined at 4 months post enrollment into the study, controlling for baseline scores on the Confidence in Survivorship Information survey. Confidence in cancer Survivorship: minimum value=strongly disagree; maximum value=strongly agree; higher is better

    At 4 months

  • Survivor outcomes

    Will compare the two arms to determine the efficacy of the intervention on survivor outcomes and analyze using a 2x2x2 repeated measures analysis of covariance. By diagnosis, differences between the attention control and intervention arm participants on responses to the Confidence in Survivorship Information survey measuring patients' knowledge of and self-efficacy in survivorship care will be examined at 8 months post enrollment into the study, controlling for baseline scores on the Confidence in Survivorship Information survey. Confidence in cancer Survivorship: minimum value=strongly disagree; maximum value=strongly agree; higher is better

    At 8 months

  • Patient-centered communication

    To test the short and long term effect of patient-centered communication, a 2x2x2 repeated measure analysis of covariance will be used to test for differences between the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) using the results from the Patient-Centered Communication survey at baseline , controlling for the baseline measure of patients' perceptions of whether care is centered around their needs. Patient-Centered Communication survey; minimum value=never; maximum value=always; higher is better

    At Baseline

  • Patient-centered communication

    To test the short and long term effect of patient-centered communication, a 2x2x2 repeated measure analysis of covariance will be used to test for differences between the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) using the results from the Patient-Centered Communication survey at 4 months (short-term, primary effect), controlling for the baseline measure of patients' perceptions of whether care is centered around their needs. Patient-Centered Communication survey; minimum value=never; maximum value=always; higher is better

    At 4 months

  • Patient-centered communication

    To test the short and long term effect of patient-centered communication, a 2x2x2 repeated measure analysis of covariance will be used to test for differences between the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups), by diagnosis (between groups) using the results from the Patient-Centered Communication survey at 8 months (long-term, secondary effect) and over time (within groups), controlling for the baseline measure of patients' perceptions of whether care is centered around their needs. Patient-Centered Communication survey; minimum value=never; maximum value=always; higher is better

    At 8 months

  • Quality of life: survey

    A 2x2x2 repeated measure analysis of covariance will be used to test for differences by diagnosis between the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups) using the results from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal Cancer survey at baseline, controlling for the baseline measure of patients' quality of life. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal Cancer survey Minimum value=0; maximum value=4; higher is better

    At Baseline

  • Quality of life: survey

    A 2x2x2 repeated measure analysis of covariance will be used to test for differences by diagnosis between the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups) using the results from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal Cancer survey at 4 months (short-term, primary effect) and over time (within groups), controlling for the baseline measure of patients' quality of life. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal Cancer survey Minimum value=0; maximum value=4; higher is better

    At 4 months

  • Quality of life: survey

    A 2x2x2 repeated measure analysis of covariance will be used to test for differences by diagnosis between the attention control arm and intervention arm (between groups) using the results from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal Cancer survey at 8 months (long-term, secondary effect) and over time (within groups), controlling for the baseline measure of patients' quality of life. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal Cancer survey Minimum value=0; maximum value=4; higher is better

    At 8 months

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Overall reach (participation rate) with primary care providers (Arm I)

    Up to 8 months

  • Percentage of primary care providers who received a clinical care plan (Arm I)

    Up to 8 months

  • Primary care providers' use of care plan information for survivorship care (Arm I)

    Up to 8 months

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Arm I (personalized care plan, telehealth sessions)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive a personalized care plan/resource manual. Patients also participate in 5 telehealth sessions with a nurse over 60 minutes each for 4 months (months 1-4) about self-management skills building, then 3 maintenance telehealth sessions with a nurse over 60 minutes each for 3 months (months 5-7) for additional self-management skills building support. A copy of patient's care plan is also sent to their PCP.

Other: Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther: Questionnaire AdministrationOther: Survivorship Care PlanOther: Telemedicine

Arm II (ASCO care plan, telehealth sessions)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receive an ASCO care plan. Patients also participate in 5 telehealth sessions with a nurse over 60 minutes each for 4 months (months 1-4) to answer questions on a handbook about life after cancer treatment, then 3 monthly telehealth sessions with a nurse over 60 minutes each for 3 months (months 5-7) to answer questions about the handbook. A copy of the ASCO care plan is also sent to their PCP.

Other: Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther: Questionnaire AdministrationOther: Telemedicine

Interventions

Ancillary studies

Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment
Arm I (personalized care plan, telehealth sessions)Arm II (ASCO care plan, telehealth sessions)

Ancillary studies

Arm I (personalized care plan, telehealth sessions)Arm II (ASCO care plan, telehealth sessions)

Receive personalized care plan/resource manual

Arm I (personalized care plan, telehealth sessions)

Participate in telehealth sessions

Also known as: Telehealth
Arm I (personalized care plan, telehealth sessions)Arm II (ASCO care plan, telehealth sessions)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer survivors who are 4 months post-treatment completion
  • History of stage I-III disease
  • Ability to read or understand English
  • All subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects, who in the opinion of the principal investigator (PI), may not be able to comply with the requirements of the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

City of Hope Medical Center

Duarte, California, 91010, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Sun V, Reb A, Debay M, Fakih M, Ferrell B. Rationale and Design of a Telehealth Self-Management, Shared Care Intervention for Post-treatment Survivors of Lung and Colorectal Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2021 Apr;36(2):414-420. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01958-8. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungColorectal NeoplasmsLung Neoplasms

Interventions

Telemedicine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carcinoma, BronchogenicBronchial NeoplasmsRespiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Delivery of Health CarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Virginia Sun

    City of Hope Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2020

First Posted

June 11, 2020

Study Start

July 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Last Updated

February 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Locations