NCT04426604

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance and validity of both light-induced fluorescence intraoral camera and laser-induced fluorescence device in comparison to visual-tactile assessment method in detection of secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 11, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 6, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

June 8, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 31, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Validity of Fluorescence-based Devices versus Visual-tactile method

    Diagnostic performance for caries detection was evaluated, assessing the validity of each diagnostic method in diagnosing secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

    Through study completion, an average of 5 months

Study Arms (3)

Light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

EXPERIMENTAL
Diagnostic Test: Light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

Laser-induced fluorescence device

EXPERIMENTAL
Diagnostic Test: Laser-induced fluorescence device

Visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Diagnostic Test: Visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria

Interventions

Each restoration margins will be assessed by Light induced fluorescence intraoral camera to assess its validity in diagnosing secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations

Light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

Each restoration margins will be assessed by Laser-induced fluorescence device to assess its validity in diagnosing secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations

Laser-induced fluorescence device

Each restoration margins will be assessed by visual-tactile assessment method which includes the use of mirror, probe under good illumination condition to assess its validity in diagnosing secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations

Visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients should be over 18 years of age.
  • Patients should have an acceptable oral hygiene level.
  • Patients should have at least one resin composite restoration.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a compromised medical history.
  • Patients with active severe periodontal disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Cairo, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Adly AM, Ibrahim SH, El-Zoghbi AF. Clinical validity of fluorescence-based devices versus visual-tactile method in detection of secondary caries around resin composite restorations: diagnostic accuracy study. BDJ Open. 2025 Jan 6;11(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41405-024-00284-7.

Central Study Contacts

Aya Mohamed Adly Ibrahim, Master's Degree

CONTACT

Shereen Hafez Ibrahim, Associate Professor (PhD)

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The assessors will not be blind about the type of intervention/control assessment methods. However it will not be allowed amongst the examiners to exchange any information throughout the entire study period
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2020

First Posted

June 11, 2020

Study Start

September 21, 2020

Primary Completion

September 1, 2021

Study Completion

September 1, 2021

Last Updated

August 6, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Locations