Other
Visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria
Total Trials
2
Max Phase
—
Type
DIAGNOSTIC TEST
Molecule
—
Success Metrics
Active Trials
0(0%)
Phase Distribution
Ph not_applicable
2
100%
Phase Distribution
0
Early Stage
0
Mid Stage
0
Late Stage
Phase Distribution2 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
2(100.0%)
Highest Phase Reached
UnknownTrial Status & Enrollment
Completion Rate
0.0%
0 of 0 finished
Non-Completion Rate
0.0%
0 ended early
Currently Active
0
trials recruiting
Total Trials
2
all time
Status Distribution
Other(2)
Detailed Status
unknown2
Development Timeline
Analytics
Development Status
Total Trials
2
Active
0
Success Rate
N/A
Most Advanced
N/A
Trials by Phase
N/A2 (100.0%)
Trials by Status
unknown2100%
Recent Activity
0 active trials
Showing 2 of 2
unknownnot_applicable
Validity of Fluorescence-Based Devices Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Detection of Secondary Caries Around Resin Composite Restorations: Invivo Diagnostic Accuracy Study
NCT04426604
unknownnot_applicable
Reliability of Light Induced Fluorescence Intraoral Camera Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Assessment of Marginal Integrity of Resin Composite Restorations: Diagnostic Invivo Study
NCT03090061
Clinical Trials (2)
Showing 2 of 2 trials
NCT04426604Not Applicable
Validity of Fluorescence-Based Devices Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Detection of Secondary Caries Around Resin Composite Restorations: Invivo Diagnostic Accuracy Study
NCT03090061Not Applicable
Reliability of Light Induced Fluorescence Intraoral Camera Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Assessment of Marginal Integrity of Resin Composite Restorations: Diagnostic Invivo Study
All 2 trials loaded
Drug Details
- Intervention Type
- DIAGNOSTIC TEST
- Total Trials
- 2