Approach-Avoidance, Computational Framework for Predicting Behavioral Therapy Outcome (AAC-BeT)
AAC-BeT
An Approach-Avoidance, Computational Framework for Predicting Behavioral Therapy Outcome in Anxiety and Depression (AAC-BeT)
2 other identifiers
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Depression and anxiety disorders rank in the top ten causes of years lived with disability. Less than 50% of patients experiencing long-lasting improvements to current gold-standard treatments. Two gold-standard behavioral interventions include behavioral activation, focused on enhancing approach behavior towards meaningful activities, and exposure-based therapy, focused on decreasing avoidance and challenging negative expectations. While these interventions have divergent treatment targets, there is little knowledge to inform which strategies should be used in the frequent case of comorbid anxiety and depression. Approach-avoidance decision-making paradigms focus on assessing responses when faced with potential rewards and threats, tapping into processes important for both anxiety and depression as well as behavioral activation and exposure-based therapy. For this study, investigators will recruit individuals reporting both anxiety and depression symptoms and randomize them to one of three different interventions: (1) behavioral activation, (2) exposure-based therapy, and a non-specific therapy approach (3) supportive therapy. Participants will complete clinical, self-report, behavioral, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessments before and after therapy. Investigators will use a computational approach to model factors that may influence one's behavior during approach-avoidance decision-making, including drives to avoid threat versus approach reward and confidence versus uncertainty in one's decisions. This project will accomplish the following aims (1) Determine how changes in brain and behavior responses during approach-avoidance conflict relate to changes in mental health symptoms with the different therapy approaches, (2) Determine the degree to which baseline brain and behavior responses during approach-avoidance conflict predict response to the different therapy approaches, above and beyond the influence of demographics and baseline symptom severity. In addition, by including peripheral blood draws and measures of grace matter volume, the project will also accomplish the following aims: (1) Determine whether kynrenine metabolites measures peripherally may be beneficial as a biomarker of treatment response and (2) determine whether there is an association between change in kynurenine metabolites and changes in gray matter volume with treatment. Results will enhance understanding of how different psychotherapy approaches (behavioral activation, exposure-based therapy) may impact brain responses and decisions when faces with potential reward versus threat and approach versus avoidance drives. In addition, results will have important implications concerning the potential for a more personalized approach to psychotherapy, enhancing knowledge of which types of therapy strategies may be most beneficial for which individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable anxiety
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable anxiety
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedJune 13, 2025
June 1, 2025
4.8 years
June 4, 2020
June 12, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Composite score from Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)
Composite score (averaging of the standardized Z scores) from the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). These Z scores will range from -3.0 to +3.0, with greater scores indicating more severe anxiety and depression symptoms or worse outcome.
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
Quinolinic Acid
Peripheral serum concentration of Quinolinic Acid
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Sheehan Disability Scale
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
National Institute of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcome Measurement and Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Scale
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
National Institute of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcome Measurement and Information System (PROMIS) Depression Scale
Up to 18 weeks after the baseline assessments
Kynurenic acid
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments
Ratio of kynurenic acid to quinolinic acid
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (9)
Amygdala reactivity to negative outcomes
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments.
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reactivity to conflict decisions
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments.
Dorsal striatal reactivity to negative outcomes
Up to 14 weeks after the baseline assessments.
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Behavioral activation
EXPERIMENTALExposure-based therapy
EXPERIMENTALSupportive therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Behavioral activation will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized, behavioral intervention focused on enhancing engagement in meaningful and reinforcing activities.
Exposure-based therapy will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized, behavioral intervention focused on decreasing avoidance to allow for inhibitory learning and challenging negative expectations.
Supportive therapy will be delivered as a 10-week, manualized intervention focused on encouraging patients to talk openly about their thoughts, emotions, and any past or current concerns.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- score \>55 on both the PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scales
- score \>5 on any one item of the SDS
- able to provide informed consent
- report of anxiety and depressive symptoms as areas of clinical concern
- sufficient English proficiency to complete procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- significant or unstable physical or mental health conditions (e.g., immediate suicidal intent) requiring medical attention
- history of bipolar, psychotic, cognitive, obsessive compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
- history of moderate to severe substance use disorder over the past year
- diagnosis of neurologic disorders
- MRI contra-indications (e.g., metal in body)
- uncorrected vision/hearing problems
- current, regular benzodiazepine use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136, United States
Related Publications (2)
Santiago J, Akeman E, Kirlic N, Clausen AN, Cosgrove KT, McDermott TJ, Mathis B, Paulus M, Craske MG, Abelson J, Martell C, Wolitzky-Taylor K, Bodurka J, Thompson WK, Aupperle RL. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial examining multilevel prediction of response to behavioral activation and exposure-based therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Trials. 2020 Jan 6;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3802-9.
PMID: 31907032BACKGROUNDAupperle RL, Melrose AJ, Francisco A, Paulus MP, Stein MB. Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Feb;36(2):449-62. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22639. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
PMID: 25224633BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robin L Aupperle, PhD
Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Interview-based assessments will be conducted by blinded clinical assessors and participants will be blinded until after completion of all baseline assessments.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2020
First Posted
June 11, 2020
Study Start
September 11, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Immediately after publication of results from the primary aims of this project.
- Access Criteria
- User registration will be required to access or download files. As part of the registration process, users must agree to the conditions of use governing access to the public release data, including restrictions against attempting to identify study participants, destruction of the data after analyses are completed, reporting responsibilities, restrictions on redistribution of the data to third parties, and proper acknowledgement of the data resource.
After publication of results from the primary aims of this project, we intend to make the data used in publications (e.g., self-report, behavior, and neuroimaging data) accessible in a public database. These data will be stripped of patient identifiers and will comply with HIPAA requirements for publicly accessible datasets. User registration will be required to access or download files. As part of the registration process, users must agree to the conditions of use governing access to the public release data, including restrictions against attempting to identify study participants, destruction of the data after analyses are completed, reporting responsibilities, restrictions on redistribution of the data to third parties, and proper acknowledgement of the data resource.