NCT04422704

Brief Summary

The main objective of the study is to understand retired people's perception of retirement, to know their personal experience and to jointly seek solutions to the needs and problems encountered. Secondarily, the aim is to understand the impact that an active aging program intervention implemented in retired people, based on the use of technology and considering the basis for the adaptation of the Prochaska and Diclemente Trans-Theoretical Model, can have in their quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 8, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

May 3, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 6, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Older adultsTechnological devicesTechnologyHealthy LifestyleQuality of life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in quality of life

    EuroQol-5D: To measure the quality of life variable before and after intervention. This tool allows exploring the perception of each participant about their health status and quality of life. This scale measures three elements: A descriptive dimension divided into 5 dimensions: mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The person must choose between one of the following levels of severity: 1 or absence of problems, 2 or presence of some problems, 3 or presence of serious or moderate problems. A visual analogue scale: the person indicates in a rule of 0 or worse health, to 100 or better health.

    Baseline and immediately after intervention (two months)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Behavioural adopted in terms of retirement

    One month before intervention

  • Changes in behavioural adopted in terms of retirement

    Baseline and immediately after intervention (two months)

  • Individual-interviews

    One month before intervention

  • Group-interviews

    Immediately after intervention (1 month)

Study Arms (1)

Retired people

EXPERIMENTAL

People who are either ordinarily or early retired and who have previously held a paid employment.

Behavioral: Technology-based-Intervention

Interventions

The intervention is intended to address the concerns and needs that emerge from the participants' interviews. The intervention is based on the principles of the process of adaptation to retirement defined by Atchley and the Prochaska and Diclemente Model on the phases of preparation for retirement. The material to be used will be based on existing resources for retired people, awareness through multimedia material and knowledge of possible contributions of different technological devices to the retirement process. The sessions consisted of showing different exercises and devices to perform physical activities, cognitive training, relaxation activities, counselling about healthy eating and leisure-time activities.

Retired people

Eligibility Criteria

Age61 Years - 74 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • People retired recently (since 10 years maximum)
  • People who attend regularly the institution selected for recruitment, which is attended by retired people over the age of 60 years old.

You may not qualify if:

  • People who present cognitive and psychological alterations that may interfere in the interview
  • People who have not had paid employment
  • People who have completed previously a preparation for retirement's program.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidade da Coruña

A Coruña, 15006, Spain

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Ye B, Chen H, Huang L, Ruan Y, Qi S, Guo Y, Huang Z, Sun S, Chen X, Shi Y, Gao J, Jiang Y. Changes in frailty among community-dwelling Chinese older adults and its predictors: evidence from a two-year longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01530-x.

    PMID: 32272903BACKGROUND
  • Gschwind YJ, Eichberg S, Ejupi A, de Rosario H, Kroll M, Marston HR, Drobics M, Annegarn J, Wieching R, Lord SR, Aal K, Vaziri D, Woodbury A, Fink D, Delbaere K. ICT-based system to predict and prevent falls (iStoppFalls): results from an international multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2015 Nov 27;12:10. doi: 10.1186/s11556-015-0155-6. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26865874BACKGROUND
  • Hamm JM, Heckhausen J, Shane J, Lachman ME. Risk of cognitive declines with retirement: Who declines and why? Psychol Aging. 2020 May;35(3):449-457. doi: 10.1037/pag0000453. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

    PMID: 32175753BACKGROUND
  • Atchley RC. Adjustment to loss of job at retirement. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1975;6(1):17-27. doi: 10.2190/EHU3-VCRV-VCRJ-04NU.

    PMID: 1150332BACKGROUND
  • Atchley RC. The meaning of retirement. J Commun. 1974 Autumn;24(4):97-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00414.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4448858BACKGROUND
  • Park BH, Lee MS, Hong JY, Bae SH, Kim EY, Kim KK, Kim DK. The stages of physical activity and exercise behavior: an integrated approach to the theory of planned behavior. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2009 Jan;21(1):71-83. doi: 10.1177/1010539508327089. Epub 2008 Nov 17.

    PMID: 19124338BACKGROUND
  • Pazzim TA, Marin AH. Retirement preparation program: evaluation of results. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 Dec 8;30(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41155-017-0079-3.

    PMID: 32026182BACKGROUND
  • Greig A, Dawes D, Murphy S, Parker G, Loveridge B. Program evaluation of a model to integrate internationally educated health professionals into clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013 Oct 11;13:140. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-140.

    PMID: 24119470BACKGROUND
  • Ballesteros S, Kraft E, Santana S, Tziraki C. Maintaining older brain functionality: A targeted review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Aug;55:453-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

    PMID: 26054789BACKGROUND
  • Hessel P. Does retirement (really) lead to worse health among European men and women across all educational levels? Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;151:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.018. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

    PMID: 26773290BACKGROUND
  • Brown RT, Diaz-Ramirez LG, Boscardin WJ, Lee SJ, Steinman MA. Functional Impairment and Decline in Middle Age: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Dec 5;167(11):761-768. doi: 10.7326/M17-0496. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

    PMID: 29132150BACKGROUND
  • Klugar M, Cap J, Klugarova J, Mareckova J, Roberson DN, Kelnarova Z. The personal active aging strategies of older adults in Europe: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 May;14(5):193-257. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-002393.

    PMID: 27532471BACKGROUND
  • Damant J, Knapp M, Freddolino P, Lombard D. Effects of digital engagement on the quality of life of older people. Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Nov;25(6):1679-1703. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12335. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

    PMID: 26919220BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Laura Nieto-Riveiro, PhD

    Universidade da Coruña

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2020

First Posted

June 9, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 8, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The IPD sharing plan contains the collection of the variables extracted from the Euroqol-5D-5L scale and the sociodemographic data of the study sample, the study protocol developed, and the informed consent form used.

Locations