A Warm Foot Bath, Sleep Quality and Comfort Level
Effect of Warm Foot Bath on Their Sleep Quality and Comfort Level in Elderly Individuals: A Randomized-controlled Trial
Effect of Warm Foot Bath on Their Sleep Quality and Comfort Level in Elderly Individuals: A Randomized-controlled Trial
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
May 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of a warm foot bath on sleep quality and comfort level among elderly individuals with sleep problems. Design and methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 217 elderly individual who stayed in two nursing homes. The sample consisted of 60 elderly individuals with sleep problem who were randomly assigned to either the warm foot bath group (n= 30) and control group (n=30).The study was completed with 60 elderly individuals. The primary outcome was an information questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the General Comfort Questionnaire and the Numerical Rating Scale.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
May 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
December 1, 2016
Actual (reported)January 31, 2017
Actual (reported)May 31, 2017
Actual (reported)May 27, 2020
Actual (reported)June 2, 2020
Actual (reported)Sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) This index was developed by Buysse and colleagues to evaluate individuals' sleep quality and sleeping disorders over a month. The scale consists of 24 items, 19 of these items are related to self-reporting and are answered by the respondents. This is composed of 19 questions which reflect seven major components. The last five items of the index (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, and 11e) are answered by the partners or roommates of the participants, and these items are not included in the scoring. Each item is scored with points ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating a "good" score and 3 indicating a "poor" score. Accordingly, higher total scores indicate poor sleep quality; scores of 0-4 indicate good sleep quality, and scores of 5-21 suggest poor sleep quality
before applying the first foot bath
Sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) This index was developed by Buysse and colleagues to evaluate individuals' sleep quality and sleeping disorders over a month. The scale consists of 24 items, 19 of these items are related to self-reporting and are answered by the respondents. This is composed of 19 questions which reflect seven major components. The last five items of the index (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, and 11e) are answered by the partners or roommates of the participants, and these items are not included in the scoring. Each item is scored with points ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating a "good" score and 3 indicating a "poor" score. Accordingly, higher total scores indicate poor sleep quality; scores of 0-4 indicate good sleep quality, and scores of 5-21 suggest poor sleep quality
six weeks after the first foot bath
Comfort level
The General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) This questionnaire was developed by Katharine Kolcaba in 1992 to determine individuals' comfort needs and evaluate nursing interventions that might be employed to ensure and increase such comfort. The GCQ uses a four-point Likert type scale and consists of 48 items. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 48, the highest score is 192. The total score obtained from the scale was divided by 48 (the number of the items in the scale) to determine the score's mean value which was presented as a score between one and four. The GCQ was adapted for use in a Turkish context by Kuguoğlu and Karabacak in 2004. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the original scale was 0.88; in the study by Kuguoglu and Karabacak, it was 0.85. The present study derived a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.68 prior to experimental and 0.75 after experimental.
65years, relative independent in daily life activities and literate, having a PSQI score of 5 or more and no communication problems.
65years, relative independent in daily life activities and literate, having a PSQI score of 5 or more and no communication problems.
The participants in experimental group were asked to soak their feet in warm water (38-40°C) for 20 minutes one hour before their bedtimes for six weeks. A special foot bath (Beurer FB50 luxury foot bath spa with water heater) was used for this purpose. The bath is 10 cm deep; it keeps water at a constant temperature of 35-48°C for 15-60 minutes, has a display screen for water temperature and duration of use, and turns off automatically.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Hanife Durgun, Dr
Ordu State Hospital
60 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 27, 2020
First Posted
June 2, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Actual (reported)Generative AI for Sleep Promotion
six weeks after the first foot bath
Dailiy sleep quality: The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) This scale was prepared as a form incorporating a scale; it was then used by individuals who were able to mark and assess their personal sleep quality each day. The NRS asks patients to choose the number from 0 to 10 that best represents their sleep with 0 representing a poor night's sleep, and 10 representing a good night's sleep.
Daily for six weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
January 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
May 31, 2017
Actual (reported)Last Updated
June 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: