A Warm Foot Bath, Sleep Quality and Comfort Level
Effect of Warm Foot Bath on Their Sleep Quality and Comfort Level in Elderly Individuals: A Randomized-controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of a warm foot bath on sleep quality and comfort level among elderly individuals with sleep problems. Design and methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 217 elderly individual who stayed in two nursing homes. The sample consisted of 60 elderly individuals with sleep problem who were randomly assigned to either the warm foot bath group (n= 30) and control group (n=30).The study was completed with 60 elderly individuals. The primary outcome was an information questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the General Comfort Questionnaire and the Numerical Rating Scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2020
CompletedJune 2, 2020
June 1, 2020
2 months
May 27, 2020
June 1, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) This index was developed by Buysse and colleagues to evaluate individuals' sleep quality and sleeping disorders over a month. The scale consists of 24 items, 19 of these items are related to self-reporting and are answered by the respondents. This is composed of 19 questions which reflect seven major components. The last five items of the index (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, and 11e) are answered by the partners or roommates of the participants, and these items are not included in the scoring. Each item is scored with points ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating a "good" score and 3 indicating a "poor" score. Accordingly, higher total scores indicate poor sleep quality; scores of 0-4 indicate good sleep quality, and scores of 5-21 suggest poor sleep quality
before applying the first foot bath
Sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) This index was developed by Buysse and colleagues to evaluate individuals' sleep quality and sleeping disorders over a month. The scale consists of 24 items, 19 of these items are related to self-reporting and are answered by the respondents. This is composed of 19 questions which reflect seven major components. The last five items of the index (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, and 11e) are answered by the partners or roommates of the participants, and these items are not included in the scoring. Each item is scored with points ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating a "good" score and 3 indicating a "poor" score. Accordingly, higher total scores indicate poor sleep quality; scores of 0-4 indicate good sleep quality, and scores of 5-21 suggest poor sleep quality
six weeks after the first foot bath
Comfort level
The General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) This questionnaire was developed by Katharine Kolcaba in 1992 to determine individuals' comfort needs and evaluate nursing interventions that might be employed to ensure and increase such comfort. The GCQ uses a four-point Likert type scale and consists of 48 items. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 48, the highest score is 192. The total score obtained from the scale was divided by 48 (the number of the items in the scale) to determine the score's mean value which was presented as a score between one and four. The GCQ was adapted for use in a Turkish context by Kuguoğlu and Karabacak in 2004. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the original scale was 0.88; in the study by Kuguoglu and Karabacak, it was 0.85. The present study derived a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.68 prior to experimental and 0.75 after experimental.
six weeks after the first foot bath
Dailiy sleep quality: The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) This scale was prepared as a form incorporating a scale; it was then used by individuals who were able to mark and assess their personal sleep quality each day. The NRS asks patients to choose the number from 0 to 10 that best represents their sleep with 0 representing a poor night's sleep, and 10 representing a good night's sleep.
Daily for six weeks
Study Arms (2)
A warm foot bath group
EXPERIMENTAL65years, relative independent in daily life activities and literate, having a PSQI score of 5 or more and no communication problems.
Control group
NO INTERVENTION65years, relative independent in daily life activities and literate, having a PSQI score of 5 or more and no communication problems.
Interventions
The participants in experimental group were asked to soak their feet in warm water (38-40°C) for 20 minutes one hour before their bedtimes for six weeks. A special foot bath (Beurer FB50 luxury foot bath spa with water heater) was used for this purpose. The bath is 10 cm deep; it keeps water at a constant temperature of 35-48°C for 15-60 minutes, has a display screen for water temperature and duration of use, and turns off automatically.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and up
- relative independent in daily life activities
- literate
- having a PSQI score of 5 or more
- no communication problems.
You may not qualify if:
- who used sleeping drugs or diuretic drugs
- had peripheral artery diseases
- neurological diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ordu Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hanife Durgun, Dr
Ordu State Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2020
First Posted
June 2, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 31, 2017
Study Completion
May 31, 2017
Last Updated
June 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share