NCT04409548

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to assessment on the interaction of spatial and temporal gait parameters and gait asymmetry in patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation (LDH) before and 15 days after surgery.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
208

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 29, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2017

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2020

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

PainGait analysisLumbar Disc HerniationSpatiotemporal gait parametersGait asymmetry

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity was obtained using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS is usually a horizontal line, 10 cm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end with "No Pain" (score of zero) on the left side up to "pain as bad as it could be" or the "worst imaginable pain" (Score of 100 \[100-mm scale\]) on the right side. The patient was asked to mark the line point that represented his or her current pain.

    The pain intensity of the patients was recorded immediately before performing the analysis.

  • Step length (cm)

    Step length is the distance between the heel contact point of one foot and that of the other foot. The step length (cm) was recorded separately for both extremities.

    Changes from the step length at 2 weeks

  • Gait cycle length (cm)

    Gait cycle length is the distance between successive foot contacts of the same limbs. The gait cycle length (cm) was recorded separately for both extremities.

    Changes from the gait cycle length at 2 weeks

  • Cadence (step/min)

    Cadence is the number of steps per minute.

    Changes from the cadence at 2 weeks

  • Velocity (cm/s)

    Velocity is the distance covered in a given period.

    Changes from the velocity at 2 weeks

  • Gait cycle duration (seconds)

    Gait cycle duration is the time between successive foot contacts of the same limbs. The gait cycle duration (seconds) was recorded separately for both extremities.

    Changes from the gait cycle duration at 2 weeks

  • Step duration (seconds)

    Step duration is the time between two consecutive heel strikes. The step duration (seconds) was recorded separately for both extremities.

    Changes from the step duration at 2 weeks

  • Double stance duration (seconds)

    Double stance duration is the time over which the body is supported by both legs. The double stance duration (seconds) was recorded separately for both extremities.

    Changes from the double stance duration at 2 weeks

  • Swing duration (seconds)

    Swing duration is the time taken for the leg to swing through while the body is in single support on the other leg. The swing duration (seconds) was recorded separately for both extremities.

    Changes from the swing duration at 2 weeks

  • Gait symmetry

    Gait symmetry is a coordinated and consistent activity of locomotion between left and right limb during walking.

    Changes from the gait asymmetry at 2 weeks (preoperative and postoperative).

Study Arms (3)

Lumbar Disc Hernaition Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The number of participants in this group is anticipated to be 153. The pain intensity of the patients was recorded by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) immediately before performing the analysis. The patients were asked to continuously walk barefoot for ten times as straight as possible without any assistance on the Win-Track platform within the same day.

Other: All of the spatial and Temporal Gait parameters

Healthy Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The number of participants in this group is anticipated to be 54. The participants were asked to continuously walk barefoot for ten times as straight as possible without any assistance on the Win-Track platform within the same day.

Other: All of the spatial and Temporal Gait parameters

Preoperative and Postoperative Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The number of participants in this group is anticipated to be 59. The patients were asked to continuously walk barefoot for ten times as straight as possible without any assistance on the Win-Track platform within the same day, before and 15 days after surgery.

Other: All of the spatial and Temporal Gait parameters

Interventions

Healthy Control GroupLumbar Disc Hernaition GroupPreoperative and Postoperative Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals who were diagnosed with LDH by a specialist;
  • Patients had a medical history and proven by MRI with more or less evidence of degenerative lumbar disc;
  • Aged between 25-80 years old;
  • Pain symptom on the lumbal area or lower extremity.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have previously received surgery or physical therapy treatment;
  • Having congenital deformity in the spine or lower extremity;
  • History of spinal surgery or other diseases affecting gait;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Situations that may cause gait balance problems;
  • Using assistive gait appliance.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Toosizadeh N, Yen TC, Howe C, Dohm M, Mohler J, Najafi B. Gait behaviors as an objective surgical outcome in low back disorders: A systematic review. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Jul;30(6):528-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

    PMID: 25921552BACKGROUND
  • Loske S, Nuesch C, Byrnes KS, Fiebig O, Scharen S, Mundermann A, Netzer C. Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2195-2204. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

    PMID: 29709554BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • TUGBA KURU COLAK, Assoc. Prof.

    Marmara University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2020

First Posted

June 1, 2020

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 29, 2017

Study Completion

December 30, 2017

Last Updated

September 27, 2022

Record last verified: 2020-05