The Effect of Large Versus Small Clog Size on Emergency Response Time
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In many hospitals, clogs, usually white, are provided for healthcare workers. In our hospital, health care professionals from the department of intensive care medicine may be summoned to an emergency situation on a 24/7 basis. Clogs are thought to be of importance for running. Although clogs are available in several sizes, clog size is typically left to the discretion of the individual healthcare worker. Interestingly, The primary goal of this randomized controlled trial is to assess if wearing large size clogs as compared to small size clogs results in increased running speed. Participants will be randomized to small versus large clog size using a using randomly permuted blocks stratified by gender. Following randomization, participants will wear the clogs of allocated size and complete a standardized running course. The primary endpoint is the time taken to complete the course. The enrolment of 50 subjects would provide 80% power to show a 5-second difference in the response time at an average response time of 30 seconds with a 6 second standard deviation. The ethical committee judged the study protocol exempt from extensive review.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2020
CompletedMay 28, 2020
May 1, 2020
1 month
March 2, 2020
May 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to complete the running course
The time to complete the course will be compared between the two groups using a linear model with the randomized allocation and the stratification variable as covariates.
Follow-up until 60 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Adverse events
Follow-up until 60 minutes.
Time to complete the running course for specific subgroups: By gender, job function, level of fitness.
Follow-up until 60 minutes.
Study Arms (2)
Small clog size
ACTIVE COMPARATORLarge clog size
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthcare workers aged 18 years or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to run on clogs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Elbers PWG, de Grooth HJ, Girbes ARJ. The effect of small versus large clog size on emergency response time: A randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2020 Dec;60:116-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
PMID: 32799180DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Paul Elbers, MD, PhD
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Coordinating investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2020
First Posted
May 28, 2020
Study Start
February 20, 2020
Primary Completion
March 30, 2020
Study Completion
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
May 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05