The Influence of Tissue Adhesive to Palatal Donor Site Healing.
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
CTG was harvested from 21 patients in each group. Donor site was treated with either GS (control) or GS+CY (test). Palatal tissue thickness, graft dimensions, working time (WT) and primary bleeding time were recorded intraoperatively. The data of pain perception (PP) will be measured using visual analog scale, quantity of analgesics (QA), secondary bleeding (SB), epithelization level (EL), and color match (CM) will be assessed prospectively. these outcomes will be evaluated in the first 7 days and 14th, 21th, and 28th days. Patient reported outcomes will be recorded using OHIB 14 questionnaire.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2020
CompletedOctober 2, 2024
October 1, 2024
7 months
May 21, 2020
October 1, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Donor site pain perception (PP)
Patients score their daily donor site pain perception (PP) level by giving numbers from 0 to 10 according to the visual analog scale (VAS) (0: no pain, 1: minimal pain, 10: severe pain)
first week
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Primary bleeding time (PBT)
during surgery
Graft height (GH)
during surgery
Graft width (GW)
during surgery
Graft thickness (GT)
during surgery
Working time (WT)
during surgery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Gelatine Sponge
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter local anesthesia (2% articaine HCl with epinephrine 1:100,000) administration, palatal thickness was measured by perpendicularly inserting a Michigan-O periodontal probe from the corners of the rectangular donor area and mean value was recorded as 'palatal tissue thickness (PTT)'. Epithelialized gingival graft was harvested with the method described by Zucchelli et al.19 After a rectangular shaped initial incision, graft with 1-1.5 mm thickness was harvested approximately 1.5 to 3 mm away from gingival margins of upper teeth. After harvesting, excess fatty tissues were removed and de-epithelialization was performed to obtain DGG. Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA)
Gelatine sponge +Cyanoacrylate
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter local anesthesia (2% articaine HCl with epinephrine 1:100,000) administration, palatal thickness was measured by perpendicularly inserting a Michigan-O periodontal probe from the corners of the rectangular donor area and mean value was recorded as 'palatal tissue thickness (PTT)'. Epithelialized gingival graft was harvested with the method described by Zucchelli et al.19 After a rectangular shaped initial incision, graft with 1-1.5 mm thickness was harvested approximately 1.5 to 3 mm away from gingival margins of upper teeth. After harvesting, excess fatty tissues were removed and de-epithelialization was performed to obtain DGG. Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) and GS covered with high viscosity CY (PeriAcryl®, Glustitch Inc., Delta, Canada) (GS+CY group)
Interventions
Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) (GS group)
Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) (GS group) and GS covered with high viscosity CY (PeriAcryl®, Glustitch Inc., Delta, Canada) (GS+CY group).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥18;
- PPS indication that needs CTG in anterior mandible;
- stable periodontium after phase I therapy;
- full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores \<15%
You may not qualify if:
- previous palatal harvesting history;
- unstable endodontic conditions;
- tooth mobility at surgical site;
- systemic disease;
- pregnancy;
- use of medications with potential adverse effects to periodontal tissues
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hacettepe University
Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- One author (H.G.K.) randomly assigned the patients, with 1:1 allocation ratio, into GS and GS+CY groups by making simple randomization without blocking (computer-generated randomization scheme) (Figure 1). Number-labeled opaque envelopes containing the name of assigned method were used for allocation concealment. The surgical procedures were carried out by (B.T.Y.) whereas another author (E.C.) acquired the intra- and post-operative data. No information regarding to the applied hemostatic was given to the patients to preserve the patient blinding.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2020
First Posted
May 27, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 1, 2019
Study Completion
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10