NCT04403503

Brief Summary

CTG was harvested from 21 patients in each group. Donor site was treated with either GS (control) or GS+CY (test). Palatal tissue thickness, graft dimensions, working time (WT) and primary bleeding time were recorded intraoperatively. The data of pain perception (PP) will be measured using visual analog scale, quantity of analgesics (QA), secondary bleeding (SB), epithelization level (EL), and color match (CM) will be assessed prospectively. these outcomes will be evaluated in the first 7 days and 14th, 21th, and 28th days. Patient reported outcomes will be recorded using OHIB 14 questionnaire.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2019

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 27, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 2, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Donor site pain perception (PP)

    Patients score their daily donor site pain perception (PP) level by giving numbers from 0 to 10 according to the visual analog scale (VAS) (0: no pain, 1: minimal pain, 10: severe pain)

    first week

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Primary bleeding time (PBT)

    during surgery

  • Graft height (GH)

    during surgery

  • Graft width (GW)

    during surgery

  • Graft thickness (GT)

    during surgery

  • Working time (WT)

    during surgery

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Gelatine Sponge

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After local anesthesia (2% articaine HCl with epinephrine 1:100,000) administration, palatal thickness was measured by perpendicularly inserting a Michigan-O periodontal probe from the corners of the rectangular donor area and mean value was recorded as 'palatal tissue thickness (PTT)'. Epithelialized gingival graft was harvested with the method described by Zucchelli et al.19 After a rectangular shaped initial incision, graft with 1-1.5 mm thickness was harvested approximately 1.5 to 3 mm away from gingival margins of upper teeth. After harvesting, excess fatty tissues were removed and de-epithelialization was performed to obtain DGG. Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA)

Drug: Gelatin Sponge;Thrombin, Bovine 5000 IU Multiple Routes Kit [GELFOAM-JMI SPONGE KIT]

Gelatine sponge +Cyanoacrylate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After local anesthesia (2% articaine HCl with epinephrine 1:100,000) administration, palatal thickness was measured by perpendicularly inserting a Michigan-O periodontal probe from the corners of the rectangular donor area and mean value was recorded as 'palatal tissue thickness (PTT)'. Epithelialized gingival graft was harvested with the method described by Zucchelli et al.19 After a rectangular shaped initial incision, graft with 1-1.5 mm thickness was harvested approximately 1.5 to 3 mm away from gingival margins of upper teeth. After harvesting, excess fatty tissues were removed and de-epithelialization was performed to obtain DGG. Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) and GS covered with high viscosity CY (PeriAcryl®, Glustitch Inc., Delta, Canada) (GS+CY group)

Drug: Cyanoacrylate, Isobutyl

Interventions

Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) (GS group)

Gelatine Sponge

Donor site was closed either with GS (Spongostan®, Ethicon, Somerville, USA) (GS group) and GS covered with high viscosity CY (PeriAcryl®, Glustitch Inc., Delta, Canada) (GS+CY group).

Gelatine sponge +Cyanoacrylate

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • age ≥18;
  • PPS indication that needs CTG in anterior mandible;
  • stable periodontium after phase I therapy;
  • full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores \<15%

You may not qualify if:

  • previous palatal harvesting history;
  • unstable endodontic conditions;
  • tooth mobility at surgical site;
  • systemic disease;
  • pregnancy;
  • use of medications with potential adverse effects to periodontal tissues

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hacettepe University

Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Bucrylate

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CyanoacrylatesAcrylatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsNitrilesEnbucrilatePolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsTissue AdhesivesManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
One author (H.G.K.) randomly assigned the patients, with 1:1 allocation ratio, into GS and GS+CY groups by making simple randomization without blocking (computer-generated randomization scheme) (Figure 1). Number-labeled opaque envelopes containing the name of assigned method were used for allocation concealment. The surgical procedures were carried out by (B.T.Y.) whereas another author (E.C.) acquired the intra- and post-operative data. No information regarding to the applied hemostatic was given to the patients to preserve the patient blinding.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assoc. Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2020

First Posted

May 27, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

February 1, 2019

Study Completion

March 1, 2019

Last Updated

October 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations