NCT04401345

Brief Summary

This is prospective randomised double blind study conducted in parturients planned for non-elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Glycopyrrolate group will receive 0.2 mg of Glycopyrrolate before start of phenylephrine infusion. Control group will receive 0.2 ml of Normal Saline before start of phenylephrine infusion. Total amount of vasopressors required i.e. ephedrine or phenylephrine will recorded in the form of phenylephrine equivalent during intraoperative period.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
258

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 26, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 21, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 20, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 18, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

caesarean sectionhypotensionspinal anaesthesiaglycopyrrolatepost-spinal anaesthesiavasopressorsnon-elective caesarean section

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total vasopressors requirement intraoperatively

    Total vasopressors required to prevent hypotension during the period of surgery

    immediately after spinal anaesthesia till the end of the surgery

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • The incidence of hypotension

    after spinal anaesthesia till the end of the surgery

  • The incidence of reactive hypertension

    after spinal anaesthesia till the end of the surgery

  • The incidence of maternal bradycardia

    after spinal anaesthesia till the end of the surgery

  • The incidence of maternal tachycardia

    after spinal anaesthesia till the end of the surgery

  • The incidence of nausea

    after spinal anaesthesia till the end of the surgery

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • The APGAR outcome of baby

    at 1 and 5 min after delivery

  • Need for neonatal resuscitation

    immediately after delivery

  • Admission to neonatal ICU (NICU)

    after delivery

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group (GP)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will receive 0.2 mg (1 ml) glycopyrrolate before phenylephrine infusion is initiated at 25mcg/min.

Drug: Glycopyrrolate 0.2 MG/ML

Placebo Group(NS)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

patients will receive 1 ml normal saline (0.9%) before phenylephrine infusion is initiated at 25 mcg/min

Drug: Normal saline

Interventions

In this group, the patients will receive glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg in 1 ml

Also known as: Glycopyrronium bromide
Experimental Group (GP)

In this group, the patients will receive 1 ml of 0.9% normal saline

Also known as: 0.9% NS
Placebo Group(NS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18-40 years
  • All parturients at term (gestational weeks ≥ 37)
  • ASA (American society of Anaesthesiologist) PS (Physical status) grade II

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \>40 year
  • ASA PS Grade \>2
  • Maternal bradycardia (baseline HR\< 60/min) or tachycardia (baseline HR\> 100/min)
  • Pregnancy induced hypertension
  • Gestational hypertension
  • Known fetal abnormalities
  • Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR)
  • Intrauterine fetal death (IUFD)
  • Contraindications to spinal anaesthesia
  • Contraindications to glycopyrrolate
  • Multiple pregnancy
  • BMI: \> 30 kg/m2
  • Height: \<150cm

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

B.P.Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

Dharān, Koshi, 56700, Nepal

Location

Related Publications (32)

  • Yentis SM, Jenkins CS, Lucas DN, Barnes PK. The effect of prophylactic glycopyrrolate on maternal haemodynamics following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2000 Jul;9(3):156-9. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.1999.0376.

    PMID: 15321086BACKGROUND
  • Saravanan S, Kocarev M, Wilson RC, Watkins E, Columb MO, Lyons G. Equivalent dose of ephedrine and phenylephrine in the prevention of post-spinal hypotension in Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jan;96(1):95-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei265. Epub 2005 Nov 25.

    PMID: 16311286BACKGROUND
  • Somboonviboon W, Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, Narasethakamol A. Incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Feb;91(2):181-7.

  • Dyer RA, Biccard BM. Ephedrine for spinal hypotension during elective caesarean section: the final nail in the coffin? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Aug;56(7):807-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02719.x. No abstract available.

  • Kinsella SM, Tuckey JP. Perioperative bradycardia and asystole: relationship to vasovagal syncope and the Bezold-Jarisch reflex. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jun;86(6):859-68. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.6.859.

  • Dobson PM, Caldicott LD, Gerrish SP, Cole JR, Channer KS. Changes in haemodynamic variables during transurethral resection of the prostate: comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Mar;72(3):267-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.3.267.

  • Ali S, Athar M, Ahmed SM. Basics of CPB. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;49:257-62.

    RESULT
  • Lee AJ, Landau R. Aortocaval Compression Syndrome: Time to Revisit Certain Dogmas. Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1975-1985. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002313.

  • Dick WF. Anaesthesia for caesarean section (epidural and general): effects on the neonate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 May;59 Suppl:S61-7. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(95)02075-4.

  • Kuhn JC, Hauge TH, Rosseland LA, Dahl V, Langesaeter E. Hemodynamics of Phenylephrine Infusion Versus Lower Extremity Compression During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):1120-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001174.

  • Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub2.

  • Lee AJ, Landau R, Mattingly JL, Meenan MM, Corradini B, Wang S, Goodman SR, Smiley RM. Left Lateral Table Tilt for Elective Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia Has No Effect on Neonatal Acid-Base Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2017 Aug;127(2):241-249. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001737.

  • Ripolles Melchor J, Espinosa A, Martinez Hurtado E, Casans Frances R, Navarro Perez R, Abad Gurumeta A, Calvo Vecino JM. Colloids versus crystalloids in the prevention of hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean section. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Sep;81(9):1019-30. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

  • Mercier FJ. Cesarean delivery fluid management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jun;25(3):286-91. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283530dab.

  • Banerjee A, Stocche RM, Angle P, Halpern SH. Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Jan;57(1):24-31. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9206-7. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

  • Sharwood-Smith G, Drummond GB. Hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia: a lesson from pre-eclampsia. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):291-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep003. No abstract available.

  • Hwang J, Min S, Kim C, Gil N, Kim E, Huh J. Prophylactic glycopyrrolate reduces hypotensive responses in elderly patients during spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;61(1):32-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-0064-y. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

  • McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ, Muchatuta NA, Hillyard S, Nathan EA. A randomised double-blind trial of phenylephrine and metaraminol infusions for prevention of hypotension during spinal and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2017 May;72(5):609-617. doi: 10.1111/anae.13836. Epub 2017 Mar 3.

  • Cardoso MM, Yamaguchi ET, Amaro AR, Mezzetti R, Torres MA. Fetal and maternal effects of bolus of phenylephrine or metaraminol during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:A31--A31.

    RESULT
  • Abboud TK, Read J, Miller F, Chen T, Valle R, Henriksen EH. Use of glycopyrrolate in the parturient: effect on the maternal and fetal heart and uterine activity. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Feb;57(2):224-7.

  • Ali-Melkkila T, Kaila T, Kanto J, Iisalo E. Pharmacokinetics of glycopyrronium in parturients. Anaesthesia. 1990 Aug;45(8):634-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14385.x.

  • Mirakhur RK, Dundee JW. Glycopyrrolate: pharmacology and clinical use. Anaesthesia. 1983 Dec;38(12):1195-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb12525.x.

  • Ure D, James KS, McNeill M, Booth JV. Glycopyrrolate reduces nausea during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section without affecting neonatal outcome. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Feb;82(2):277-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.2.277.

  • Quiney NF, Murphy PG. The effect of pretreatment with glycopyrrolate on emetic and hypotensive problems during caesarean section conducted under spinal anaesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2000;9:156-9.

    RESULT
  • Chamchad D, Horrow JC, Nakhamchik L, Sauter J, Roberts N, Aronzon B, Gerson A, Medved M. Prophylactic glycopyrrolate prevents bradycardia after spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled prospective trial with heart rate variability correlation. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Aug;23(5):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 May 31.

  • Yoon HJ, Cho HJ, Lee IH, Jee YS, Kim SM. Comparison of hemodynamic changes between phenylephrine and combined phenylephrine and glycopyrrolate groups after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jan;62(1):35-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.62.1.35. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

  • Patel SD, Habib AS, Phillips S, Carvalho B, Sultan P. The Effect of Glycopyrrolate on the Incidence of Hypotension and Vasopressor Requirement During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):552-558. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002274.

  • Allen TK, George RB, White WD, Muir HA, Habib AS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2010 Nov;111(5):1221-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e1db21. Epub 2010 May 21.

  • Wang X, Mao M, Liu S, Xu S, Yang J. A Comparative Study of Bolus Norepinephrine, Phenylephrine, and Ephedrine for the Treatment of Maternal Hypotension in Parturients with Preeclampsia During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia. Med Sci Monit. 2019 Feb 9;25:1093-1101. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914143.

  • Chabicovsky M, Winkler S, Soeberdt M, Kilic A, Masur C, Abels C. Pharmacology, toxicology and clinical safety of glycopyrrolate. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 May 1;370:154-169. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

  • Bruntion L (ed), Chabner B (ed), Knollman B (ed). Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12th ed. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies; 2011.

    RESULT
  • Deshar R, Subedi A, Pokharel K, Sah BP, Prasad JN. Effect of glycopyrrolate on vasopressor requirements for non-elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01882-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypotension

Interventions

GlycopyrrolateSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quaternary Ammonium CompoundsAminesOrganic ChemicalsOnium CompoundsPyrrolidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Glycopyrrolate and normal saline will be administered as 1 ml clear fluid, and therefore, both patient and investigator will be blinded to the randomization and intervention.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Experimental Group (GP): In the experimental group patients will receive 0.2 mg (1 ml) glycopyrrolate before phenylephrine infusion is initiated. Placebo Group (NS): In the placebo group patients will receive 1 ml normal saline (0.9%) before phenylephrine infusion is initiated.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2020

First Posted

May 26, 2020

Study Start

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion

January 31, 2021

Study Completion

January 31, 2021

Last Updated

February 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations