NCT04399551

Brief Summary

The overall objective of the CAB LA + RPV LA clinical development program is to develop a highly effective, well-tolerated, two-drug, LA injectable regimen which has the potential to offer improved treatment convenience, compliance and improved quality of life for people living with HIV compared to current standard of care. This interventional study will examine different implementation strategies in different clinic settings across European countries to identify strategies which best meet the needs in each local context and involve both participants receiving study treatment CAB LA + RPV LA (patient study participants \[PSP\]) as well as the healthcare providers at the investigator site level (staff study participants \[SSP\]). SSPs consists of 2 groups: standard and enhanced arm.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
437

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 hiv-infections

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
5 countries

18 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 18, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 28, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 7, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 13, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 19, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 5, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

May 18, 2020

Results QC Date

March 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

CabotegravirRilpivirineLong-acting injectablesPatient study participantsStaff study participants

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Change From Baseline in Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM-Imp) Score in SSP at Month 12

    The AIM-Imp was designed to assess the acceptability of an implementation process (i.e., perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory). The measure consists of four items/statements (1. The implementation support thus far meets my approval 2. The implementation support thus far is appealing to me 3. I like the implementation support I have received 4. I welcome implementation support for the CAB + RPV injection treatment), each with a five-point rating scale (1 = completely disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, and 5 = completely agree). The mean score ranges from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating the least acceptability and 5 the most acceptability.

    Baseline (Month 1) and Month 12

  • Change From Baseline in Implementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM-Imp) Score in SSPs at Month 12

    The IAM-Imp is designed to assess the appropriateness of an implementation process (i.e., the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer, and the perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem). The IAM-Imp is a four-item/statement measure (1. The implementation support thus far seems fitting 2. The implementation support seems suitable for using the CAB + RPV injection treatment 3. The implementation support seems applicable for the CAB + RPV injection treatment 4. The implementation support seems like a good match) with a five-point rating scale (1 = completely disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, and 5 = completely agree). The mean score ranges from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating the least appropriateness and 5 the most appropriateness.

    Baseline (Month 1) and Month 12

  • Change From Baseline in Feasibility of Implementation Measure (FIM-Imp) Score at Month 12

    The FIM-Imp was a four-item/statement measure (1. The implementation support seems implementable in our clinic/practice 2. The implementation support seems possible in our clinic/practice 3. The implementation support seems doable in our clinic/practice 4. The implementation support seems easy to use in our clinic/practice) and was measured on a five-point rating scale (1 = completely disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, and 5 = completely agree). The mean score ranges from 1 to 5 with 1 indicating the least feasibility and 5 the most feasibility.

    Baseline (Month 1) and Month 12

  • Number of Participants That Discussed Themes Arising Out of Qualitative Semi-structured Interviews Which Are Coded as Acceptability

    A semi-structured interview guide was designed to support the discussion surrounding experience with the implementation of CAB+RPV LA injection treatment. The interview guide topics were informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework and Proctor Outcomes to facilitate discussions on the acceptability from the SSPs' perspective. The results of themes that are integral to successful implementation are presented based on implementation strategies.

    Up to 12 Months

  • Number of Participants That Discussed Themes Arising Out of Qualitative Semi-structured Interviews Which Are Coded as Appropriateness

    A semi-structured interview guide was designed to support the discussion surrounding experience with the implementation of CAB+RPV LA injection treatment. The interview guide topics were informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework and Proctor Outcomes to facilitate discussions on the appropriateness from the SSPs' perspective. The results of themes that are integral to successful implementation are presented based on implementation strategies.

    Up to Month 12

  • Number of Participants That Discussed Themes Arising Out of Qualitative Semi-structured Interviews Which Are Coded as Feasibility

    A semi-structured interview guide was designed to support the discussion surrounding experience with the implementation of CAB+RPV LA injection treatment. The interview guide topics were informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework and Proctor Outcomes to facilitate discussions on the feasibility from the SSPs' perspective. The results of themes that are integral to successful implementation are presented based on implementation strategies.

    Up to Month 12

Secondary Outcomes (43)

  • Number of Staff Study Participants That Discussed Facilitators for Acceptability Assessed Via Semi Structured Interviews (SSIs)

    Up to 12 Months

  • Number of Staff Study Participants That Discussed Barriers for Acceptability Assessed Via SSIs

    Up to 12 Months

  • Number of Staff Study Participants That Discussed Facilitators for Appropriateness Assessed Via SSIs

    Up to 12 Months

  • Number of Staff Study Participants That Discussed Barriers for Appropriateness Assessed Via SSIs

    Up to 12 Months

  • Number of Staff Study Participants That Discussed Facilitators for Feasibility Assessed Via SSIs

    Up to 12 Months

  • +38 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Participants with HIV infection

EXPERIMENTAL

HIV-infected participants will receive CAB LA + RPV LA regimen for a month of oral lead in (OLI) at Day 1 followed by CAB LA + RPV LA injections at Months 1 and 2 and every 2 months (Q2M) thereafter.

Drug: CAB OLIDrug: CAB LADrug: RPV OLIDrug: RPV LA

Staff study participants (SSP)

OTHER

Staff study participants will be randomized to receive standard implementation support (Arm-S; through visit(s) with the medication lead in their country, education on the medication, and patient and staff education/support materials) or through enhanced implementation support (Arm-E; through the addition of continuous quality improvement during the study).

Other: Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) calls

Interventions

CAB will be available as 30 milligrams (mg) tablet. It will be administered as one tablet once daily with food from Day 1 to Month 1.

Participants with HIV infection
CAB LADRUG

CAB LA 600 mg will be administered as intramuscular (IM) injection.

Participants with HIV infection

RPV will be available as 25 mg tablet. It will be administered as one tablet once daily with food from Day 1 to Month 1.

Participants with HIV infection
RPV LADRUG

RPV LA 900 mg will be administered as IM injection.

Participants with HIV infection

CQI will be attended by the enhanced arm (Arm-E). The CQI calls will be conducted to identify problems/challenges, generate plans to address the challenges, and identify how to measure the change that results from the plan.

Staff study participants (SSP)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants aged 18 years or older at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • HIV-1 infected and must be suppressed on a guideline recommended active Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen for at least 6 months prior to screening. Any prior switch, defined as a change of a single drug or multiple drugs simultaneously, must have occurred due to tolerability/safety, access to medications, or convenience/simplification, and must not have been done for virologic failure (on treatment HIV-1 RNA more than or equal to \[\>=\]200 c/mL).
  • Documented evidence of at least two plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \<50 c/mL in the 12 months prior to Screening: at least one \<6 months prior to screening and one 6-12 months prior to screening.
  • Plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at screening.
  • A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative urine human chorionic gonadotrophin \[hCG\] test at screen and at Day 1), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies:
  • Non-reproductive potential is defined as:
  • Pre-menopausal females with one of the following:
  • Documented tubal ligation.
  • Documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion.
  • Hysterectomy.
  • Documented Bilateral Oophorectomy.
  • Postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea \[in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol levels consistent with menopause. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment.
  • Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed in the Modified List of Highly Effective Methods for Avoiding Pregnancy in Females of Reproductive Potential (FRP) from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication, throughout the study, and for at least 30 days after discontinuation of all oral study medications and for at least 52 weeks after discontinuation of CAB LA and RPV LA.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and in this protocol. Eligible participants or their legal guardians (and next of kin when locally required), must sign a written informed consent form before any protocol-specified assessments are conducted. Enrolment of participants who are unable to provide direct informed consent is optional and will be based on local legal/regulatory requirements and site feasibility to conduct protocol procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Within 6 months prior to screening, plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement \>=50 c/mL.
  • During the previous 12 months, any confirmed HIV-1 RNA measurement \>=200 c/mL.
  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study.
  • Any pre-existing physical or mental condition (including substance use disorder) which, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the dosing schedule and/or protocol evaluations or which may compromise the safety of the participant.
  • Participants determined by the investigator to have a high risk of seizures, including participants with an unstable or poorly controlled seizure disorder. A participant with a prior history of seizure may be considered for enrolment if the investigator believes the risk of seizure recurrence is low.
  • Participants who, in the investigator's judgment, pose a significant suicide risk. Participant's recent history of suicidal behavior and/or suicidal ideation should be considered when evaluating for suicide risk.
  • The participant has a tattoo, gluteal implant/ enhancements or other dermatological condition overlying the gluteus region which may interfere with interpretation of injection site reactions.
  • Evidence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on the results of testing for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and HBV Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) as follows:
  • Participants positive for HBsAg are excluded.
  • Participants negative for anti-HBs but positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for HBV DNA are excluded.
  • Participants who are anticipated to require Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment within 12 months must be excluded. Asymptomatic individuals with chronic HCV infection will not be excluded; investigators must carefully assess if therapy specific for HCV infection is required. (HCV treatment on study may be permitted, following consultation and approval of the DAA based therapy being considered with the medical monitor).
  • Participants with HCV co-infection will be allowed entry into this study if:
  • Liver enzymes meet entry criteria.
  • HCV disease has undergone appropriate work-up, and is not advanced. Additional information (where available) on participants with HCV coinfection at screening should include results from any liver biopsy, Fibroscan, ultrasound, or other fibrosis evaluation, history of cirrhosis or other decompensated liver disease, prior treatment, and timing/plan for HCV treatment.
  • In the event that recent biopsy or imaging data is not available or inconclusive, the Fib-4 score will be used to verify eligibility:
  • +23 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (18)

GSK Investigational Site

Antwerp, 2000, Belgium

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Brussels, 1000, Belgium

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Brussels, 1200, Belgium

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Bordeaux, 33075, France

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Orléans, 45067, France

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Paris, 75004, France

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Paris, 75010, France

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Paris, 75018, France

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Munich, Bavaria, 80337, Germany

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60596, Germany

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Alicante, 03010, Spain

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Cartagena (Murcia), 30202, Spain

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Marbella, 29600, Spain

Location

GSK Investigational Site

Zaragoza, 50009, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Jonsson-Oldenbuttel C, Ghosn J, van der Valk M, Florence E, Vera F, De Wit S, Rami A, Bonnet F, Hocqueloux L, Hove K, Ait-Khaled M, DeMoor R, Bontempo G, Latham CL, Gutner CA, Iyer S, Gill M, Czarnogorski M, D'Amico R, van Wyk J. Safety and Effectiveness From the Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Implementation Study in European Locations Study: Phase 3b Hybrid Type III Implementation Study Integrating Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine Long-Acting Into European Clinical Settings. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2024 Aug 15;96(5):472-480. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003448. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

  • Gutner CA, Hocqueloux L, Jonsson-Oldenbuttel C, Vandekerckhove L, van Welzen BJ, Slama L, Crusells-Canales M, Sierra JO, DeMoor R, Scherzer J, Ait-Khaled M, Bontempo G, Gill M, Patel N, D'Amico R, Hove K, Baugh B, Barnes N, Hadi M, Low EL, Anand SB, Hamilton A, Garges HP, Czarnogorski M. Implementation of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine: primary results from the perspective of staff study participants in the Cabotegravir And Rilpivirine Implementation Study in European Locations. J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Jul;27(7):e26243. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26243.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
GSK Response Center
Organization
GlaxoSmithKline

Study Officials

  • GSK Clinical Trials

    ViiV Healthcare

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
This is an open-label study hence no blinding is required
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2020

First Posted

May 22, 2020

Study Start

September 28, 2020

Primary Completion

March 7, 2022

Study Completion

March 13, 2023

Last Updated

April 5, 2024

Results First Posted

May 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.
Access Criteria
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
More information

Locations