Improving Safety of Diagnosis and Therapy in the Inpatient Setting
PSLL2-0
Patient Safety Learning Laboratory: Improving Safety of Diagnosis and Therapy in the Inpatient Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
700
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To improve the safety of diagnosis and therapy for a set of conditions and undifferentiated symptoms for hospitalized patients, the investigators will employ a set of methods and tools from the disciplines of systems engineering, human factors, quality improvement,and data analytics to thoroughly analyze the problem, design and develop potential solutions that leverage existing current technological infrastructure, and implement and evaluate the final interventions. The investigators will engage the interdisciplinary care team and patient (or their caregivers) to ensure treatment trajectories match the anticipated course for working diagnoses (or symptoms), and whether they are in line with patient and clinician expectations. The investigators will use an Interrupted time series (ITS) design to assess impact on diagnostic errors that lead to patient harm. The investigators will perform quantitative and qualitative evaluations using implementation science principles to understand if the interventions worked, and why or why not.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2021
CompletedJuly 26, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.3 years
May 10, 2020
July 21, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Diagnostic error
Data Source: Chart audit Analytic Variables: * % patients with diagnostic error * % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE (i.e., harmful DE) * % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE that was severe (i.e., harmful and severe DE) * % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE that was preventable (i.e., harmful, severe, and preventable DE)
30 days (at most) from admission to the hospital
"Safe diagnosis"
Data Source: Chart audit Analytic variables: • % patients with correct diagnosis or therapy established within 24 hours of admission
30 days (at most) from admission to the hospital
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Healthcare resource utilization
30 days after discharge from the hospital
Patient satisfaction
30 days after discharge from the hospital
Study Arms (2)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients do not have access to the Patient Dx Questionnaire.
Patient Dx Questionnaire User group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient enrollees will be randomized to receive the Patient Dx Questionnaire administered by the research staff at the bedside.
Interventions
A Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational Curriculum will consist of an interactive, one-hour "teach-the-teacher" workshop delivered to resident-attending pairs early on during their inpatient medicine rotation. During the workshop, we will discuss the motivation behind teaching diagnostic uncertainty, review factors that may predict risk of diagnostic error during hospitalization, introduce the framework. Each resident-attending pair will work through a case-based exercise focused on managing learners' diagnostic uncertainty during rounds. Our research team will also conduct Training for clinical staff working on intervention units and will provide "at-the-elbow" support during the intervention period of the main trial.
A "Diagnostic Timeout" is a structured "pocket guide" that clinicians may use to address uncertainty in a step-wise approach for patients who have risk factors for diagnostic error. This tool can be used during or after clinical rounds, inside or outside of a patient's room if the patient is agreeable. The "Diagnostic Timeout" will be introduced as part of the Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational Curriculum as well as Training.
We will administer a survey, the Dx Questionnaire, to patients which asks a series of questions on communication regarding diagnosis with the care team. Patients admitted to inpatient units within the prior 24 hours will be approached after asking the patient's nurse to determine whether it is the appropriate time to approach for enrollment. Upon explaining the objectives of the survey and obtaining verbal informed consent, patients will be asked to complete the Dx Questionnaire via REDCap on an iPad. Alternatively, the research assistant administering the survey will go through the Dx Questionnaire with the patient and record their answers in REDCap on their behalf. If patients' answers indicate a gap in communication (i.e., an answer of "No" on a question), the Research Assistant will ask for permission to follow-up within the next few days and will relay the gap in communication to the patients' care team (i.e., nurse).
Epic-integrated Quality and Safety Dashboard, currently in operational use at BWH, will be enhanced to include a new diagnostic safety column. Clinical staff will receive Training and "at-the-elbow" support by the research team upon implementation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Adult patients admitted to General Medicine Services at Brigham and Women's Hospital during the 21-months study data collection period
- English speakers
- Patients who were diagnosed with any of the following conditions and symptoms upon admission:
- Abdominal pain
- Altered mental status/ delirium / confusion
- Asthma / chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Cellulitis / soft tissue infection
- Chest pain
- Cough
- Deep vein thrombosis / pulmonary embolism / venous thromboembolism
- Dyspnea / short of breath
- Failure to thrive
- Pneumonia
- Protein-calorie malnutrition
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Not pregnant women, prisoners and institutionalized individuals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anuj K Dalal, MD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David W Bates, MD, MSc
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2020
First Posted
May 19, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2019
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 30, 2021
Last Updated
July 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share