NCT04393909

Brief Summary

To improve the safety of diagnosis and therapy for a set of conditions and undifferentiated symptoms for hospitalized patients, the investigators will employ a set of methods and tools from the disciplines of systems engineering, human factors, quality improvement,and data analytics to thoroughly analyze the problem, design and develop potential solutions that leverage existing current technological infrastructure, and implement and evaluate the final interventions. The investigators will engage the interdisciplinary care team and patient (or their caregivers) to ensure treatment trajectories match the anticipated course for working diagnoses (or symptoms), and whether they are in line with patient and clinician expectations. The investigators will use an Interrupted time series (ITS) design to assess impact on diagnostic errors that lead to patient harm. The investigators will perform quantitative and qualitative evaluations using implementation science principles to understand if the interventions worked, and why or why not.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
700

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 10, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 19, 2020

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 26, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

May 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Diagnostic errors

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Diagnostic error

    Data Source: Chart audit Analytic Variables: * % patients with diagnostic error * % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE (i.e., harmful DE) * % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE that was severe (i.e., harmful and severe DE) * % patients with diagnostic error with actual or potential AE that was preventable (i.e., harmful, severe, and preventable DE)

    30 days (at most) from admission to the hospital

  • "Safe diagnosis"

    Data Source: Chart audit Analytic variables: • % patients with correct diagnosis or therapy established within 24 hours of admission

    30 days (at most) from admission to the hospital

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Healthcare resource utilization

    30 days after discharge from the hospital

  • Patient satisfaction

    30 days after discharge from the hospital

Study Arms (2)

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients do not have access to the Patient Dx Questionnaire.

Behavioral: Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational CurriculumBehavioral: Diagnostic TimeoutBehavioral: Enhancements to Epic-integrated Quality & Safety Dashboard

Patient Dx Questionnaire User group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patient enrollees will be randomized to receive the Patient Dx Questionnaire administered by the research staff at the bedside.

Behavioral: Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational CurriculumBehavioral: Diagnostic TimeoutBehavioral: Patient Diagnostic (Dx) QuestionnaireBehavioral: Enhancements to Epic-integrated Quality & Safety Dashboard

Interventions

A Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational Curriculum will consist of an interactive, one-hour "teach-the-teacher" workshop delivered to resident-attending pairs early on during their inpatient medicine rotation. During the workshop, we will discuss the motivation behind teaching diagnostic uncertainty, review factors that may predict risk of diagnostic error during hospitalization, introduce the framework. Each resident-attending pair will work through a case-based exercise focused on managing learners' diagnostic uncertainty during rounds. Our research team will also conduct Training for clinical staff working on intervention units and will provide "at-the-elbow" support during the intervention period of the main trial.

Control groupPatient Dx Questionnaire User group

A "Diagnostic Timeout" is a structured "pocket guide" that clinicians may use to address uncertainty in a step-wise approach for patients who have risk factors for diagnostic error. This tool can be used during or after clinical rounds, inside or outside of a patient's room if the patient is agreeable. The "Diagnostic Timeout" will be introduced as part of the Diagnostic Uncertainty Educational Curriculum as well as Training.

Control groupPatient Dx Questionnaire User group

We will administer a survey, the Dx Questionnaire, to patients which asks a series of questions on communication regarding diagnosis with the care team. Patients admitted to inpatient units within the prior 24 hours will be approached after asking the patient's nurse to determine whether it is the appropriate time to approach for enrollment. Upon explaining the objectives of the survey and obtaining verbal informed consent, patients will be asked to complete the Dx Questionnaire via REDCap on an iPad. Alternatively, the research assistant administering the survey will go through the Dx Questionnaire with the patient and record their answers in REDCap on their behalf. If patients' answers indicate a gap in communication (i.e., an answer of "No" on a question), the Research Assistant will ask for permission to follow-up within the next few days and will relay the gap in communication to the patients' care team (i.e., nurse).

Patient Dx Questionnaire User group

Epic-integrated Quality and Safety Dashboard, currently in operational use at BWH, will be enhanced to include a new diagnostic safety column. Clinical staff will receive Training and "at-the-elbow" support by the research team upon implementation.

Control groupPatient Dx Questionnaire User group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Adult patients admitted to General Medicine Services at Brigham and Women's Hospital during the 21-months study data collection period
  • English speakers
  • Patients who were diagnosed with any of the following conditions and symptoms upon admission:
  • Abdominal pain
  • Altered mental status/ delirium / confusion
  • Asthma / chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Cellulitis / soft tissue infection
  • Chest pain
  • Cough
  • Deep vein thrombosis / pulmonary embolism / venous thromboembolism
  • Dyspnea / short of breath
  • Failure to thrive
  • Pneumonia
  • Protein-calorie malnutrition
  • +2 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Not pregnant women, prisoners and institutionalized individuals

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02120, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DeliriumConfusionBack PainChest PainAsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCellulitisSoft Tissue InfectionsCoughVenous ThrombosisPulmonary EmbolismVenous ThromboembolismDyspneaFeverFailure to ThriveAstheniaProtein-Energy MalnutritionHeadacheNeck PainHypoxiaPneumoniaSepsisSyncopeVomitingDiarrheaAbdominal Pain

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersPainBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesSkin Diseases, InfectiousInfectionsSuppurationConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesInflammationRespiration DisordersSigns and Symptoms, RespiratoryThrombosisEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesEmbolismThromboembolismBody Temperature ChangesProtein DeficiencyDeficiency DiseasesMalnutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesRespiratory Tract InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeUnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersSigns and Symptoms, Digestive

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Anuj K Dalal, MD

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David W Bates, MD, MSc

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: We will conduct a pre-post interrupted time series design study in which we compare the relative effectiveness of the intervention over pre-post intervention for enrolled patients for our main outcomes.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2020

First Posted

May 19, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion

September 30, 2021

Study Completion

December 30, 2021

Last Updated

July 26, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations