NCT04389723

Brief Summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Qualia Mind on cognition in a healthy adult population between ages of 18 and 75 years. Qualia Mind is a nootropic supplement containing a complex mixture of vitamins, minerals, amino acids, choline donors, and herbal ingredients. These components have been demonstrated to exert their cognitive effects through distinct mechanisms of action involving cholinergic, glutamatergic, and dopaminergic receptor signalling; neuroplasticity; and modulation of cell membrane structure and metabolism.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2020

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 12, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 9, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

April 30, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 7, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

CognitionNootropicDietary SupplementHealthyCambridge Brain Science Test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The difference in the change from baseline in Overall Mental Performance after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    Assessed using Cambridge Brain Science Test comprising a total of 12 assessments, each of which is a neurocognitive task that measures a core element of cognition. Four cognitive domains Overall Mental Performance, Verbal Ability, Reasoning and Short-term Memory scores will be calculated from using scores from the 12 assessments. Based on previous studies (1), these scores may range from -3.70 to 4.01 or beyond. Scores greater than 0 are above average and those less than 0 are below average. Scores for individual assessments may range from -39 through 240 or beyond.

    5 days

  • The difference in the change from baseline in Combined Verbal Ability scores after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    Assessed using Cambridge Brain Science Test comprising a total of 12 assessments, each of which is a neurocognitive task that measures a core element of cognition. Four cognitive domains Overall Mental Performance, Verbal Ability, Reasoning and Short-term Memory scores will be calculated from using scores from the 12 assessments. Based on previous studies (1), these scores may range from -3.70 to 4.01 or beyond. Scores greater than 0 are above average and those less than 0 are below average. Scores for individual assessments may range from -39 through 240 or beyond.

    5 days

  • The difference in the change from baseline in Combined Reasoning Scores after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    Assessed using Cambridge Brain Science Test comprising a total of 12 assessments, each of which is a neurocognitive task that measures a core element of cognition. Four cognitive domains Overall Mental Performance, Verbal Ability, Reasoning and Short-term Memory scores will be calculated from using scores from the 12 assessments. Based on previous studies (1), these scores may range from -3.70 to 4.01 or beyond. Scores greater than 0 are above average and those less than 0 are below average. Scores for individual assessments may range from -39 through 240 or beyond.

    5 days

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • The difference in the change from baseline in combined Short-term Memory Scores after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • The difference in the change from baseline in Verbal Reasoning after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • The difference in the change from baseline in Deductive Reasoning after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • The difference in the change from baseline in Alternating Attention after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • The difference in the change from baseline in Selective Attention after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (29)

  • Incidence of pre-emergent adverse eventsafter 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • Incidence of post-emergent adverse events after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • Change in systolic blood pressure after 5 days of supplementation with Qualia Mind compared to placebo

    5 days

  • +26 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Placebo→ Qualia Mind

OTHER

Subjects are first administered the placebo then crossover to the investigational product

Dietary Supplement: Qualia MindDietary Supplement: Placebo

Qualia Mind→ Placebo

OTHER

Subjects are first administered the investigational product then crossover to the placebo

Dietary Supplement: Qualia MindDietary Supplement: Placebo

Interventions

Qualia MindDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Multi-ingredient Dietary supplement

Placebo→ Qualia MindQualia Mind→ Placebo
PlaceboDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Multi-ingredient Placebo

Placebo→ Qualia MindQualia Mind→ Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Provided voluntary, written, informed consent to participate in the study
  • Male and female participants between 18 and 75 years of age, inclusive
  • BMI between 18.5 to 32.5 kg/m2, inclusive
  • Female participant is not of child-bearing potential, defined as females who have undergone a sterilization procedure (e.g. hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, complete endometrial ablation) or have been post-menopausal for at least 1 year prior to screening
  • or,
  • Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative baseline urine pregnancy test and agree to use a medically approved method of birth control for the duration of the study. All hormonal birth control must have been in use for a minimum of three months. Acceptable methods of birth control include:
  • Hormonal contraceptives including oral contraceptives, hormone birth control patch (Ortho Evra), vaginal contraceptive ring (NuvaRing), injectable contraceptives (Depo-Provera, Lunelle), or hormone implant (Norplant System)
  • Double-barrier method
  • Intrauterine devices (implanted for at a minimum of 3 months)
  • Non-heterosexual lifestyle or agrees to use contraception if planning on changing to heterosexual partner(s)
  • Vasectomy of partner at least 6 months prior to screening
  • Willingness to complete questionnaires, records, and diaries associated with the study and to complete all clinic visits
  • A score of ≥ 25 on MMSE-2 (Section 9.7.5)
  • Agrees to avoid high caffeine consumption starting 5-days prior to visit 2 and during the study (equivalent to no more than 2 standard cups of caffeinated coffee or tea per day)
  • Agrees to avoid caffeine consumption 24 hours prior to in-clinic visits
  • +6 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who are cognitively impaired and/or who are unable to give informed consent
  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the trial
  • Allergy, sensitivity, or intolerance to the investigational product's active or inactive ingredients
  • Previous diagnosis of a sleep disorder
  • Currently experiencing vivid nightmares or sleepwalking
  • Current employment that calls for rotating shift work or shift work that will disrupt normal circadian rhythm in the last 3 weeks
  • Unstable metabolic disease or chronic diseases as assessed by the QI
  • Unstable hypertension. Treatment on a stable dose of medication for at least 3 months will be considered by the QI
  • Type I or Type II diabetes
  • A significant cardiovascular event in the past 6 months. Participants with no significant cardiovascular event on stable medication may be included after assessment by the QI on a case by case basis
  • Major surgery in the past 3 months or individuals who have planned surgery during the course of the trial. Participants with minor surgery will be considered on a case-by-case basis by the QI
  • Cancer, except skin cancers completely excised with no chemotherapy or radiation with a follow up that is negative. Volunteers with cancer in full remission for more than five years after diagnosis are acceptable
  • Individuals with an autoimmune disease or are immune-compromised
  • Self-reported diagnosis of HIV-, Hepatitis B- and/or C-positive
  • History of or current diagnosis with kidney and/or liver diseases as assessed by the QI on a case-by-case basis, with the exception of history of kidney stones symptom-free for 6 months
  • +14 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Great Lakes Clinical Trials

Chicago, Illinois, 60640, United States

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Manders M, de Groot LC, van Staveren WA, Wouters-Wesseling W, Mulders AJ, Schols JM, Hoefnagels WH. Effectiveness of nutritional supplements on cognitive functioning in elderly persons: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Oct;59(10):1041-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.10.m1041.

    PMID: 15528776BACKGROUND
  • Kennedy DO, Veasey RC, Watson AW, Dodd FL, Jones EK, Tiplady B, Haskell CF. Vitamins and psychological functioning: a mobile phone assessment of the effects of a B vitamin complex, vitamin C and minerals on cognitive performance and subjective mood and energy. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jun-Jul;26(4-5):338-47. doi: 10.1002/hup.1216. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

    PMID: 21751253BACKGROUND
  • Qin B, Xun P, Jacobs DR Jr, Zhu N, Daviglus ML, Reis JP, Steffen LM, Van Horn L, Sidney S, He K. Intake of niacin, folate, vitamin B-6, and vitamin B-12 through young adulthood and cognitive function in midlife: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Oct;106(4):1032-1040. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.157834. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

    PMID: 28768650BACKGROUND
  • Knott V, de la Salle S, Choueiry J, Impey D, Smith D, Smith M, Beaudry E, Saghir S, Ilivitsky V, Labelle A. Neurocognitive effects of acute choline supplementation in low, medium and high performer healthy volunteers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015 Apr;131:119-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

    PMID: 25681529BACKGROUND
  • Holguin S, Martinez J, Chow C, Wurtman R. Dietary uridine enhances the improvement in learning and memory produced by administering DHA to gerbils. FASEB J. 2008 Nov;22(11):3938-46. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-112425. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

    PMID: 18606862BACKGROUND
  • Glade MJ, Smith K. Phosphatidylserine and the human brain. Nutrition. 2015 Jun;31(6):781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

    PMID: 25933483BACKGROUND
  • Kennedy DO, Haskell CF, Mauri PL, Scholey AB. Acute cognitive effects of standardised Ginkgo biloba extract complexed with phosphatidylserine. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jun;22(4):199-210. doi: 10.1002/hup.837.

    PMID: 17457961BACKGROUND
  • Benson S, Downey LA, Stough C, Wetherell M, Zangara A, Scholey A. An acute, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study of 320 mg and 640 mg doses of Bacopa monnieri (CDRI 08) on multitasking stress reactivity and mood. Phytother Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):551-9. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5029. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

    PMID: 23788517BACKGROUND
  • Pase MP, Kean J, Sarris J, Neale C, Scholey AB, Stough C. The cognitive-enhancing effects of Bacopa monnieri: a systematic review of randomized, controlled human clinical trials. J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Jul;18(7):647-52. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0367. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

    PMID: 22747190BACKGROUND
  • Jowko E, Sadowski J, Dlugolecka B, Gierczuk D, Opaszowski B, Cieslinski I. Effects of Rhodiola rosea supplementation on mental performance, physical capacity, and oxidative stress biomarkers in healthy men. J Sport Health Sci. 2018 Oct;7(4):473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 20.

    PMID: 30450257BACKGROUND
  • Cova I, Leta V, Mariani C, Pantoni L, Pomati S. Exploring cocoa properties: is theobromine a cognitive modulator? Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Feb;236(2):561-572. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-5172-0. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

    PMID: 30706099BACKGROUND
  • Owen GN, Parnell H, De Bruin EA, Rycroft JA. The combined effects of L-theanine and caffeine on cognitive performance and mood. Nutr Neurosci. 2008 Aug;11(4):193-8. doi: 10.1179/147683008X301513.

    PMID: 18681988BACKGROUND
  • Ohwada K, Takeda H, Yamazaki M, Isogai H, Nakano M, Shimomura M, Fukui K, Urano S. Pyrroloquinoline Quinone (PQQ) Prevents Cognitive Deficit Caused by Oxidative Stress in Rats. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2008 Jan;42(1):29-34. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.2008005.

    PMID: 18231627BACKGROUND
  • Bhanumathy M, Harish MS, Shivaprasad HN, Sushma G. Nootropic activity of Celastrus paniculatus seed. Pharm Biol. 2010 Mar;48(3):324-7. doi: 10.3109/13880200903127391.

    PMID: 20645820BACKGROUND
  • Pan X, Gong N, Zhao J, Yu Z, Gu F, Chen J, Sun X, Zhao L, Yu M, Xu Z, Dong W, Qin Y, Fei G, Zhong C, Xu TL. Powerful beneficial effects of benfotiamine on cognitive impairment and beta-amyloid deposition in amyloid precursor protein/presenilin-1 transgenic mice. Brain. 2010 May;133(Pt 5):1342-51. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq069. Epub 2010 Apr 12.

    PMID: 20385653BACKGROUND
  • Maier LJ, Ferris JA, Winstock AR. Pharmacological cognitive enhancement among non-ADHD individuals-A cross-sectional study in 15 countries. Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Aug;58:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

    PMID: 29902691BACKGROUND
  • Lakhan SE, Kirchgessner A. Prescription stimulants in individuals with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: misuse, cognitive impact, and adverse effects. Brain Behav. 2012 Sep;2(5):661-77. doi: 10.1002/brb3.78. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

    PMID: 23139911BACKGROUND
  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1202204BACKGROUND
  • Hampshire A, Highfield RR, Parkin BL, Owen AM. Fractionating human intelligence. Neuron. 2012 Dec 20;76(6):1225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.022.

    PMID: 23259956BACKGROUND
  • Wild CJ, Nichols ES, Battista ME, Stojanoski B, Owen AM. Dissociable effects of self-reported daily sleep duration on high-level cognitive abilities. Sleep. 2018 Dec 1;41(12):zsy182. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy182.

    PMID: 30212878BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Rupal Trivedi, MD

    Great Lakes Clinical Trials LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2020

First Posted

May 15, 2020

Study Start

May 12, 2020

Primary Completion

September 15, 2020

Study Completion

September 15, 2020

Last Updated

October 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations