NCT04375722

Brief Summary

This study will assess the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on language recovery after stroke as well as healthy language functions.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
56mo left

Started Jan 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress58%
Jan 2020Dec 2030

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 4, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 1, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 5, 2020

Completed
9.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2030

Expected
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 25, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

10 years

First QC Date

May 1, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

languagelanguage impairmenttranscranial alternating current stimulationtACS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • tACS changes in language performance verbal STM tasks

    Improvement on verbal STM performance as determined by increases in span, accuracy or decreases in reaction time is expected with active tACS.

    Changes monitored over pre, during and immediately after 20 minutes of tACS

  • tACS-dependent neurophysiological changes

    Concomitant frequency-specific EEG changes in spectral power and phase synchronization are expected.

    Changes monitored over pre and immediately after 20 minutes of tACS

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Individual differences in tACS responsiveness

    Based on immediate changes monitored after 20 minutes of tACS

Study Arms (1)

tACS 10 Hz low frequency

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants in a within-subject design will receive high-Definition-tACS, delivered via a battery operated alternating current stimulator (Soterix) using two 3x1 center-surround montages. Targets of stimulation will be localized based on the 10-10 International EEG system with center electrodes placed at a frontal and a temporoparietal site. The current is turned on and increased in a ramplike fashion over approximately 30 seconds. Participants will undergo tACS with frequencies ranging from 4-40Hz for 20-minutes with 2 milliampere (mA) peak-to-peak intensity. For sham stimulation, tACS is turned off after the first 30 seconds.

Device: tACS

Interventions

tACSDEVICE

Active or Sham tACS will be applied.

tACS 10 Hz low frequency

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy Controls
  • years of age or older
  • Fluent in English
  • No history of neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Stroke Patients
  • Diagnosed with post-stroke aphasia by referring physician/neuropsychologist
  • Consent date \>=1 months after stroke onset
  • Right-handed
  • Fluent in English
  • years of age or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe cognitive, auditory or visual impairments that would preclude cognitive and language testing
  • Presence of major untreated or unstable psychiatric disease
  • A chronic medical condition that is not treated or is unstable
  • The presence of cardiac stimulators or pacemakers
  • Any metal implants in the skull
  • Contraindications to MRI or tACS
  • History of seizures
  • History of dyslexia or other developmental learning disabilities

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, Brockmoller J, Brunoni AR, Chen R, Cohen LG, Dowthwaite G, Ellrich J, Floel A, Fregni F, George MS, Hamilton R, Haueisen J, Herrmann CS, Hummel FC, Lefaucheur JP, Liebetanz D, Loo CK, McCaig CD, Miniussi C, Miranda PC, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Nowak R, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poppendieck W, Priori A, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell J, Rueger MA, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wexler A, Ziemann U, Hallett M, Paulus W. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1774-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

    PMID: 28709880BACKGROUND
  • Bucur M, Papagno C. Are transcranial brain stimulation effects long-lasting in post-stroke aphasia? A comparative systematic review and meta-analysis on naming performance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jul;102:264-289. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 8.

    PMID: 31077693BACKGROUND
  • Buzsaki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the brain. New York: Oxford.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chu RK, Braun AR, Meltzer JA. MEG-based detection and localization of perilesional dysfunction in chronic stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Apr 8;8:157-69. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.019. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26106540BACKGROUND
  • Dubovik S, Ptak R, Aboulafia T, Magnin C, Gillabert N, Allet L, Pignat JM, Schnider A, Guggisberg AG. EEG alpha band synchrony predicts cognitive and motor performance in patients with ischemic stroke. Behav Neurol. 2013;26(3):187-9. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-129007.

    PMID: 22713421BACKGROUND
  • Finnigan S, van Putten MJ. EEG in ischaemic stroke: quantitative EEG can uniquely inform (sub-)acute prognoses and clinical management. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;124(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

    PMID: 22858178BACKGROUND
  • Finnigan SP, Walsh M, Rose SE, Chalk JB. Quantitative EEG indices of sub-acute ischaemic stroke correlate with clinical outcomes. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;118(11):2525-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.021. Epub 2007 Sep 21.

    PMID: 17889600BACKGROUND
  • Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Elm J, Sen S, George MS, Bonilha L. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287.

    PMID: 30128538BACKGROUND
  • Fries P. Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence. Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):220-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034.

    PMID: 26447583BACKGROUND
  • Grefkes C, Fink GR. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain. 2011 May;134(Pt 5):1264-76. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr033. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

    PMID: 21414995BACKGROUND
  • Helfrich RF, Schneider TR, Rach S, Trautmann-Lengsfeld SA, Engel AK, Herrmann CS. Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol. 2014 Feb 3;24(3):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.041. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

    PMID: 24461998BACKGROUND
  • Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, Struber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14;7:279. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 23785325BACKGROUND
  • Kielar A, Deschamps T, Chu RK, Jokel R, Khatamian YB, Chen JJ, Meltzer JA. Identifying Dysfunctional Cortex: Dissociable Effects of Stroke and Aging on Resting State Dynamics in MEG and fMRI. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Mar 3;8:40. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00040. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 26973515BACKGROUND
  • Shah-Basak PP, Wurzman R, Purcell JB, Gervits F, Hamilton R. Fields or flows? A comparative metaanalysis of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation to treat post-stroke aphasia. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016 May 2;34(4):537-58. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150616.

    PMID: 27163249BACKGROUND
  • Shah-Basak PP, Kielar A, Deschamps T, Verhoeff NP, Jokel R, Meltzer J. Spontaneous oscillatory markers of cognitive status in two forms of dementia. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Apr 1;40(5):1594-1607. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24470. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

    PMID: 30421472BACKGROUND
  • Shah-Basak PP, Norise C, Garcia G, Torres J, Faseyitan O, Hamilton RH. Individualized treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 21;9:201. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00201. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 25954178BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AphasiaStrokeLanguageLanguage Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Speech DisordersCommunication DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCommunicationBehavior

Study Officials

  • Priyanka Shah-Basak, PhD

    Medical College of Wisconsin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sidney Schoenrock, MA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: In the within-subject design healthy participants and stroke survivors will receive tACS stimulation with active and/or sham settings in a randomized order with \>48 hours washout period in between stimulation sessions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Priyanka Shah-Basak, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2020

First Posted

May 5, 2020

Study Start

January 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Last Updated

May 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations