Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Using Endoscopic Stapler in Early Stage Cervical Cancer Patients (SOLUTION)
SOLUTION
Safety Of Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Using Endoscopic sTapler for Inhibiting tumOr Spillage of Cervical Neoplasms (SOLUTION): a Phase II Study
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The SOLUTION trial aims to show the efficacy and safety of performing radical hysterectomy by minimally invasive surgery using an endoscopic stapler in patients with cervical cancer stage IB1 (FIGO staging 2009) and thus to prove that minimally invasive surgery is non-inferior to open surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
June 26, 2023
June 1, 2023
8.5 years
April 19, 2020
June 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
4.5 year disease-free survival [DFS] rate
Probability of no recurrence from the day of surgery until post-operative 4.5 years
Examined at post-operative 4.5 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
4.5 year overall survival [OS] rate
Examined at post-operative 4.5 years
Pattern of recurrence sites
Examined every 3 months during post-operative 1 year, every 2 months during post-operative 2 years, and every 6 months during post-operative 4.5 years
Morbidity
Examined during operation and post-operative 4 and 6 weeks.
Study Arms (1)
SOLUTION group
EXPERIMENTALPatients enrolled in this clinical trial will undergo radical hysterectomy through minimally invasive surgery using an endoscopic stapler which both cuts and simultaneously sutures the open vaginal stump.
Interventions
Radical hysterectomy by minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic) will be done with the help of an endoscopic stapler in cutting and suturing the uterine cervix.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females, aged 20 years or older
- Histologically confirmed primary squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix
- Patients with FIGO stage IB1 (FIGO staging 2009)
- : stromal invasion\>5 mm or 7 mm \<lesion size ≤4 cm
- Patients undergoing either type B or C hysterectomy (Querleu-Morrow classification)
- Patients with normal bone marrow, renal and hepatic function
- WBC \> 3.0x10\^9 cells/L
- Platelets \> 100x10\^9 cells/L
- Serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL
- Serum total bilirubin \<1.5 x normal range and AST/SGOT or ALT/SGPT \<3 x normal range
- ECOG performance status 0 or 1
- Synchronous cancer with no evidence of recurrence during the past 5 years
- Informed consent of patient
You may not qualify if:
- Any histological type other than squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix
- Tumor size greater than 4 cm
- Patients with FIGO less than stage IA2 or greater than IB2 (FIGO staging 2009)
- stromal invasion ≤5 mm and lesion size ≤7 mm (less than IA2)
- or lesion size\> 4 cm (greater than IB2)
- Patients with evidence of metastatic disease by conventional imaging studies, enlarged pelvic or aortic lymph nodes greater than 2 cm, or histologically positive lymph nodes
- Patients in pregnancy
- Patients with a history of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy
- Patients with contraindication of surgery (serious concomitant systemic disorders incompatible with the study to be decided at the discretion of the investigator)
- Patients who agree to intra-operative lymphatic mapping (IOLM) must not have:
- Known allergies to triphenylmethane compounds
- History of retroperitoneal surgery.
- History of pelvic irradiation.
- Cold knife or LEEP cone biopsy within 4 weeks of enrollment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Seoul National University Hospitallead
- Johnson & Johnsoncollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
Seoul, South Korea
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine
Suwon, South Korea
Related Publications (9)
Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):169-182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X.
PMID: 30638582BACKGROUNDWood DE. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lung Cancer Screening. Thorac Surg Clin. 2015 May;25(2):185-97. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
PMID: 25901562BACKGROUNDNam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):903-11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
PMID: 21841155RESULTPark JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;108(1):63-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.23347. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
PMID: 23737035RESULTRamirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, Isla D, Tamura M, Zhu T, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Nicklin JL, Coleman RL, Obermair A. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PMID: 30380365RESULTKohler C, Hertel H, Herrmann J, Marnitz S, Mallmann P, Favero G, Plaikner A, Martus P, Gajda M, Schneider A. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388.
PMID: 31155516RESULTKim SI, Cho JH, Seol A, Kim YI, Lee M, Kim HS, Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
PMID: 30642625RESULTPark SJ, Kong TW, Kim T, Lee M, Choi CH, Shim SH, Yim GW, Lee S, Lee EJ, Lim MC, Chang SJ, Lee SJ, Lee SH, Song T, Lee YY, Kim HS, Nam EJ. Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol. BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09429-z.
PMID: 35346103DERIVEDMun J, Park SJ, Yim GW, Chang SJ, Kim H; Trial Monitoring Committee of SOLUTION trial. Solution to prevent tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using the endoscopic stapler for treating early-stage cervical cancer: Surgical technique with video. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Dec;50(10):102211. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102211. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
PMID: 34481135DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hee Seung Kim, M.D. Ph.D.
Seoul National University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- All patients enrolled in this clinical trial will undergo radical hysterectomy through minimally invasive surgery using an endoscopic stapler which both cuts and simultaneously sutures the open vaginal stump.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2020
First Posted
May 1, 2020
Study Start
July 2, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
June 26, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06