Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB1,IB2,IIA1)
LAUNCH 2
A Multicenter Noninferior Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB1,IB2,IIA1)
1 other identifier
interventional
780
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB1, IB2, IIA1).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 7, 2026
ExpectedNovember 1, 2021
October 1, 2021
3.3 years
June 8, 2021
October 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the rate of PFS at 5 years
The curves of PFS at 5 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The logrank test will be used to test the above hypothesis, the 5-year PFS rate difference and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the comparison between the two groups will be estimated.
5 years from surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
the rate of OS at 5 years
5 years from surgery
Other Outcomes (3)
Analysis of continuous outcomes
1 years from surgery
Analysis of binary outcomes
5 years from surgery
Safety analysis
5 years from surgery
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALthe group of LRH
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe group of ARH
Interventions
Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.
Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix, adenocarcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma (Stage IB1,IB2,IIA1).
- Age ≥ 21 years and ≤ 70 years.
- Surgery type B and C (refer to Q-M surgical staging)
- Normal range of liver and kidney function and blood count (specific details below) Hemoglobin \> 60g/L Platelets \> 70\*109/L Leukocytes \> 3\*109/L Creatinine \< 50mg/dL Transaminase abnormal indicators ≤ 3 Maximum value of transaminases not exceeding 3 times the corresponding normal value.
- No history of other malignancies.
- Non-pregnancy.
- Physical strength classification: Karnofsky score ≥ 60;
- Subjects voluntarily joined the study, signed the informed consent form, were compliant and cooperated with the follow-up.
- No psychiatric disorders and other serious immune system disorders (e.g. lupus erythematosus, myasthenia gravis, HIV infection, etc.) (Note: Maximum diameter measurement of cervical lesions is based on PET-CT, or CT, or MRI)
You may not qualify if:
- Those who are contraindicated for various surgeries and cannot undergo surgery.
- Patients who have received pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy irradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer.
- Patients with recurrent cervical cancer
- Patients with CT, MRI or PET-CT suggesting suspicious metastasis of pelvic lymph nodes with maximum diameter \>2cm after further improvement of preoperative examination.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan Universitylead
- Children's Hospital of Fudan Universitycollaborator
- Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicinecollaborator
- Shanghai Zhongshan Hospitalcollaborator
- RenJi Hospitalcollaborator
- Taizhou Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciencescollaborator
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Related Publications (1)
Wu X, Qiu L, Lou W, Wang X, Zhu T, Zhang Y, Hu W, Xue X, Zhu Z, Xiang L, Li J, Fang X, Gao S, Feng H, Diao W, Zhang H, Du M, Bai Y, Hou Y, Yan W, Feng H, Yu H, Zhu S, Du Y, Jiang H. A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial. Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06245-5.
PMID: 35395868DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xin Wu, PHD
The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2021
First Posted
June 18, 2021
Study Start
May 7, 2021
Primary Completion
September 7, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 7, 2026
Last Updated
November 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share