Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloids in Septic Shock Adults
Effects of Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloid Solutions in Septic Shock Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Fluid resuscitation is an important treatment in septic shock patients, however whether crystalloid composition affects septic shock patients outcomes remains unclear. According to previous studies, low-chlorine crystalloids could significantly reduce the incidence of kidney injury and 30-day mortality compared with high-chlorine crystalloids in critically ill adults. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of low-chlorine crystalloids would result in a lower incidence of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE 30: overall incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction) than high-chlorine crystalloids in septic shock adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2020
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedApril 28, 2020
April 1, 2020
1.3 years
April 24, 2020
April 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the composite of death and new receipt of renal-replacement therapy MAKE30
overall incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction within 30 days
up to 30 days
Study Arms (2)
Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection
EXPERIMENTAL1. administration route and dosage:Intravenous infusion, 500\~1000 ml/time. The dosage can be increased or decreased according to the age, weight and symptoms. 2. rate: according to the the routine rate of fluid resuscitation of septic shock in the ICUs of Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University.
0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1. administration route and dosage:Intravenous infusion, 500\~1000 ml/time. The dosage can be increased or decreased according to the age, weight and symptoms. 2. rate: according to the the routine rate of fluid resuscitation of septic shock in the ICUs of Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University.
Interventions
For each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.
For each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old \<age ≤ 85 years old;
- Diagnosis of septic shock within 24 hours (sepsis 3.0);
- Needing fluid resuscitation judged by clinicians;
- The patient or the patient's legally acceptable representative signs the informed consent (signs within 24h of enrollment)
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating period;
- Renal replacement therapy has been received or expected to receive within 6 hours;
- Those who were previously enrolled in the study;
- Estimated death within 24 hours;
- Other situations that not suitable for enrollment judged by researchers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2020
First Posted
April 28, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 28, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04