Sponsor study identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 5, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Actual (reported)This aim study aims to compare clinical effectiveness of customized lingual brackets and conventional labial brackets in alignment period in a sample of Class I malocclusion patients treated on a nonextraction basis.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
April 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
October 1, 2015
Actual (reported)January 5, 2017
Actual (reported)April 1, 2017
Actual (reported)April 19, 2020
Actual (reported)April 22, 2020
Actual (reported)Irregularity index (mm)
Crowding of anterior teeth changes after alignment
18 weeks
Distance between canine teeth (mm)
Measurement from right canine to left canine distance
18 weeks
Distance between first premolar teeth (mm)
Measurement from right first premolar to left first premolar distance
18 weeks
Distance between second premolar teeth (mm)
Measurement from right first premolar to left first premolar distance
18 weeks
Distance between first molar teeth (mm)
Measurement from right first molar to left first molar distance
18 weeks
Arch length (mm)
18 weeks
Patients with moderate crowding without extraction treated with Incognito lingual bracket (3M Unitek, Bad Essen, Germany)
Patients with moderate crowding without extraction treated with labial bracket (3M Unitek, Ca, USA
A type of bracket that applied lingual surface of teeth.
A type of bracket that applied labial surface of teeth.
Khattab TZ, Hajeer MY, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R. Maxillary dental arch changes following the leveling and alignment stage with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances: a preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):561-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1579.
Auluck A. Lingual orthodontic treatment: what is the current evidence base? J Orthod. 2013 Sep;40 Suppl 1:S27-33. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000073.
Yazgı Ay Ünüvar, PhD
Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
20 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
April 19, 2020
First Posted
April 22, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Actual (reported)Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Alobeid A, El-Bialy T, Reimann S, Keilig L, Cornelius D, Jager A, Bourauel C. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 2018 Nov 30;40(6):660-665. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy005.
Ziebura T, Hohoff A, Flieger S, Stamm T. Accidental debondings: Buccal vs fully individualized lingual multibracket appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):649-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.030.
Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Jun;35(3):375-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs029. Epub 2012 May 9.
Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Katsaros C, Eliades T, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of forces and moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):82-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr048. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Fuck LM, Wiechmann D, Drescher D. Comparison of the initial orthodontic force systems produced by a new lingual bracket system and a straight-wire appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2005 Sep;66(5):363-76. doi: 10.1007/s00056-005-0442-3. English, German.
Primary Completion
January 5, 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Last Updated
April 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: