Opioid Free Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery
Opioid-free Anaesthesia Effectiveness in Thoracic Surgery - Objective Measurement With a Skin Conductance Algesimeter: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Proper assessment of pain and adequate analgesia in thoracic surgery is a challenging issue for medical practitioners. Basic aspects of thoracic anaesthesia are general anesthesia, intubation with double lumen tube and separation of lung ventilation, however proper analgesia needs to be standardized. Role of opioids in this clinical setting is reduced due to high risk of respiratory system complications. Instead, use of opioid free anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia is proposed. The aim of this study is to compare the use of opioid anaesthesia with opioid free anaesthesia and paravertebral block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2020
CompletedNovember 2, 2022
October 1, 2022
2.2 years
April 18, 2020
October 29, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Intraoperative pain related stress [oscillations per second]
During general anesthesia the pain-related stress was assessed using a method of skin conductance fluctuations. The measurement was based on changes in skin conductance that arise under the influence of a pain stimulus.
Period before induction of anaesthesia to termination of anaesthesia
Intraoperative opioid usage [mg]
Intraoperative usage of opioids was noted.
Intraoperative period
Intraoperative arterial blood pressure [mmHg]
Non-invasive arterial blood pressure was recorded every 5 minutes during operation.
Intraoperative period
Intraoperative heart rate [bpm]
Heart rate was recorded every 5 minutes during operation.
Intraoperative period
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Overall postoperative analgesia satisfaction
48 hours
Postoperative pain intensity (VAS)
48 hours
Postoperative pain intensity (PHHPS)
48 hours
Postoperative arterial blood pressure [mmHg]
48 hours
Postoperative heart rate [bmp]
48 hours
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.1 mg∙kg-1, propofol 2 mg∙kg-1, and cisatracurium 0.15 mg∙kg-1. The patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen tube in adequate size and positioned laterally. Anesthesia was maintained with 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane. The patients awoke from anesthesia in a post-anesthesia care unit, and were extubated after the administration of adequate doses of atropine and neostigmine as required. After surgery, if a patient complained of pain then she/he was given i.v. oxycodone by an anesthetist before commencing the patient controlled analgesia (PCA). This dose was titrated to achieve adequate analgesia. Each patient then commenced PCA. The PCA solution was oxycodone (1mgml-1) and the PCA was programmed to allow a self-administered bolus dose of 1mg oxycodone with a lockout time of 5 min. Additionally, patients were given 1 g intravenous paracetamol every 6 h and 100mg of intravenous ketoprofen every 12 h.
Opioid Free Aneasthesia group
EXPERIMENTALGeneral anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.1 mg∙kg-1, propofol 2 mg∙kg-1, and cisatracurium 0.15 mg∙kg-1. The patients were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen tube in adequate size and positioned laterally. Anesthesia was maintained with 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane. The patients awoke from anesthesia in a post-anesthesia care unit, and were extubated after the administration of adequate doses of atropine and neostigmine as required. After surgery, if a patient complained of pain then she/he was given i.v. oxycodone by an anesthetist before commencing the patient controlled analgesia (PCA). This dose was titrated to achieve adequate analgesia. Each patient then commenced PCA. The PCA solution was oxycodone (1mgml-1) and the PCA was programmed to allow a self-administered bolus dose of 1mg oxycodone with a lockout time of 5 min. Additionally, patients were given 1 g intravenous paracetamol every 6 h and 100mg of intravenous ketoprofen every 12 h.
Interventions
Intraoperatively, fentanyl in fractional doses of 1-3 µg∙kg-1 were applied if the heart rate (HR; Heart Rate) or mean blood pressure (MBP; Mean Blood Pressure) increased by more than 20% above the baseline value obtained just before surgery commencement.
Before the induction of general anesthesia, a single-shot thoracic paravertebral block (ThPVB) was performed at the Th3-Th4 level. An insulated needle was used, connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator. 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 ml∙kg-1) was then injected after a negative aspiration test. The efficacy of the blockade was checked after 20 min on both sides of the thorax with a plastic ampoule of saline. A difference in the sensation of cold between the sides of the thorax was assumed to indicate an effective block. Afterwards a continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine was started: 1. immediately after anesthesia induction, lidocaine was administered as an i.v. bolus at a dose of 1.5 mg∙kg-1 and ketamine in an i.v. bolus of 0.35 mg∙kg-1; 2. followed by an infusion of lidocaine 2.0 mg∙kg-1∙h-1 for 2 hours, continued at a dose of 1.2 mg∙kg-1∙h-1, and ketamine infusion 0.2 mg∙kg-1∙h-1 for 2 hours, continued at a dose of 0.12 mg∙kg-1∙h-1.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- body mass index between 19-30 kg/m2,
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status between 1 and 3
You may not qualify if:
- lack of consent
- significant coagulopathy,
- contraindication to drugs used in protocol
- history of chronic pain,
- chest wall neoplastic invasion,
- previous thoracic spine surgery,
- mental state preventing from effective use of PCA device,
- renal failure (GFR \<60 ml/min/1,73 m2)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1
Zabrze, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-800, Poland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2020
First Posted
April 21, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10