Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations
A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes for Double-Lumen Tubes Intubation in Humans. A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
133
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Compared with the Macintosh laryngoscopy (MAC), the videolaryngoscopes (VL) provide superior glottis views and longer times to double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation. We hypothesize that the use of the King Vision™ (KVL) and the Airtraq® VLs may reduce the time for DLT intubation compared with the Glidescope® (GVL) and MAC in patients undergoing thoracic procedures. Methods: One hundred-forty patients who will be scheduled for elective thoracic procedures using the DLT for one-lung ventilation will be randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=35 per group) to intubate using the MAC, GVL, Airtraq®, or KVL. Time to DLT intubation, glottis view, ease of intubation, number of optimization maneuvers, and failure to intubation (\>150 s.) will be recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 24, 2017
January 1, 2017
1.6 years
November 27, 2014
January 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to the duration of endobronchial intubation
defined as the time from when the laryngoscope entered between the patient's lips until successful DLT placement (regardless of the number of attempts).\[
3 minutes after laryngoscopy
Secondary Outcomes (7)
best obtained glottis view during laryngoscopy
30 sec after laryngosocopy
ease of endobronchial intubation
30 sec after laryngosocopy
number of optimization maneuvers
150 sec after laryngosocopy
number of the 'backwards upwards rightwards pressure' (BURP) maneuver
150 sec after laryngosocopy
failure rate for double lumen tube intubation
150 sec after laryngosocopy
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Macintosh
PLACEBO COMPARATORDouble lumen tube intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope
Glidescope®
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble lumen tube intubation using Glidescope® videolaryngoscope
Airtraq®
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble lumen tube intubation using Airtraq® videolaryngoscope
King Vision™
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble lumen tube intubation using King Vision™ videolaryngoscope
Interventions
double lumen tube intubation using the Glidescope® videolaryngoscope. The distal portion of a left-sided DLT will be angulated to the right concealing the distal orifice of the tracheal lumen. The DLT will be advanced directly through the vocal cords after initial 90° clockwise rotation, the stylet will be removed, and then the DLT will be advanced gently while rotating in a 180° couterclockwise direction
double lumen tube intubation using the King Vision™ videolaryngoscope. the distal 21 cm of the left-sided DLT will be bended to replicate the curve of the non-channeled blade and the proximal curve of the DLT remains directed to the right side. Then, after initial 90° clockwise rotation, the bronchial cuff passes through the vocal cords, the stylet of the DLT will be withdrawn and the DLT will be rotated 180°counterclockwise while advancing the DLT to the desired depth.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status II/III
- Elective thoracic procedures
You may not qualify if:
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification class III to IV
- forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) less than 50% of predicted values
- forced vital capacity (FVC) less than 50% of predicted values
- severe asthma
- pregnancy
- risk of regurgitation
- risk of pulmonary aspiration
- history of gastro-esophageal reflux
- body mass index more than 40 kg m-2
- anticipated difficult intubation
- preoperative postoperative ventilatory support
- planned postoperative ventilatory support
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Fahd Hospital of the University
Khobar, Eastern Province, 31952, Saudi Arabia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed R El Tahan, MD
Associate Professor at Anesthesiology Dept
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alaa khidr, MD
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2014
First Posted
December 2, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01