Bupropion Versus Escitalopram on Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits
Effects of Bupropion Versus Escitalopram on Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits in Patients With Major Depression and Increased Inflammation and Anhedonia
2 other identifiers
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to determine whether bupropion (vs escitalopram) increases functional connectivity (FC) within reward-related neurocircuits and decreases motivational deficits in depressed patients with increased inflammation and anhedonia. Participants will be randomized to take bupropion extended release (XL) or escitalopram for 8 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 25, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 29, 2023
CompletedDecember 29, 2023
December 1, 2023
1.8 years
April 16, 2020
October 13, 2023
December 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Targeted Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex-Ventral Striatal (vmPFC-VS) Functional Connectivity (FC)
Targeted FC is calculated as the degree of correlation in activity between a 3mm3 radius sphere in VS and the vmPFC cluster identified as being reward-sensitive in neuroimaging meta-analyses and as used to define vmPFC in previous work. Subject-level correlations for degree of vmPFC-VS FC is Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln\[(1+R)/(1-R)\]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity, whereby greater Z-scores reflected stronger correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity (i.e., higher VS-vmPFC connectivity). For each study timepoint, Z-scores will be extracted and the change in mean FC values compared to baseline will be calculated. The central value is 0, and the standard deviation depends on the sample variance. Increasing values indicate increasing connectivity between the indicated brain regions (VS and vmPFC). There are no relevant thresholds, and there is no direct interpretation of results in terms of clinical improvement.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Study Arms (2)
Bupropion
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks.
Escitalopram
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks.
Interventions
Participants will take 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose will be increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Participants will take 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose will be increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- willing and able to give written informed consent
- a primary diagnosis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) MD, current as diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V Axis I Disorders (SCID-V)
- score of ≥16 on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR)
- off all antidepressant or other psychotropic therapy (e.g. mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and sedative hypnotics) for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline visit (8 weeks for fluoxetine); concomitant administration of up to 2 mg of clonazepam or its equivalent per day will be allowed, but not within 12 hours of study assessments
- CRP\>2mg/L
- Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR) anhedonia subscale score ≥5
You may not qualify if:
- history of any autoimmune disorder
- history of hepatitis B or C infection or human immunodeficiency virus infection
- history of any type of cancer requiring treatment with more than minor surgery
- unstable cardiovascular, endocrinologic, hematologic, hepatic, renal, or neurologic disease (as determined by physical examination and laboratory testing)
- history of any (non-mood-related) psychotic disorder; active psychotic symptoms of any type; substance abuse/dependence within 6 months of study entry (as determined by SCID)
- an active eating disorder or antisocial personality disorder
- a history of a cognitive disorder or ≤28 on the Mini-Mental State Exam unless otherwise approved by the PI
- pregnancy or lactation
- chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS) (excluding 81mg of aspirin), glucocorticoid containing medications
- use of NSAIDS or oral glucocorticoids at any time during the study
- any contraindication for MRI scanning
- failure of more than 2 antidepressant trials in the current episode
- Intolerance of bupropion or escitalopram
- BMI \>40 (to exclude severe obesity)
- due to the high co-morbidity between anxiety disorders and depression, the study team plans to include patients with anxiety-related disorders excluding obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) if depression is the primary diagnosis. Patients with stable medical conditions and on medications for those conditions will not be excluded. Concomitant administration of up to 2 mg of clonazepam or its equivalent per day will be allowed, but not within 12 hours of study assessments.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Emory Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrew H. Miller, MD
- Organization
- Emory University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Miller, MD
Emory University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2020
First Posted
April 20, 2020
Study Start
September 23, 2020
Primary Completion
July 25, 2022
Study Completion
July 25, 2022
Last Updated
December 29, 2023
Results First Posted
December 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Data will become available two years after the publication of the main findings from the study.
- Access Criteria
- Material transfers will be made with no more restrictive terms than in the Simple Letter Agreement (SLA) or the Uniform Biological Materials Transfer Agreement (UBMTA) and without reach through requirements. Should any intellectual property arise which requires a patent, the researchers will ensure that the technology (materials and data) remains widely available to the research community in accordance with University policies and the NIH Principles and Guidelines document. A variety of models for data sharing may be adopted, including both central databases and peer-to-peer solutions. Appropriate de-identification techniques should allow sharing of human data, while maintaining appropriate privacy required by both HIPAA and the Common Rule. In addition, informed consent documents should provide sufficient detail about the intent to archive, share and re-analyze data (and samples). Decisions about sharing materials will be made by the study PIs.
The database generated by the study will be made available to the broader research community upon request accompanied by documentation of local institutional review board (IRB) approval. Investigators will provide relevant protocols and published phenotypic and clinical data upon request.