NCT04351711

Brief Summary

The study investigators hypothesize that the pneumonia arising in patients with COVID-19 is largely of immunopathological origin. The investigators will therefore seek to define the immune activation phenotype of patients in respiratory distress and to see if this immune signature is predictive of mortality. Finally, the investigators will look for overproduced inflammatory mediators to identify potential therapeutic targets.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 9, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 10, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 17, 2020

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 12, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 12, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

April 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

respiratory failure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (47)

  • Membrane expression of Human Leukocyte Antigen -DR isotype compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 38 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of Programmed cell death 1 protein compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 45RA compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 27 (naïve/central memory/effector memory) compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of CD57 on T CD4+ and T CD8+ cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 27 on T CD4+ and T CD8+ cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 28 on T CD4+ and T CD8+ cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of Human Leukocyte Antigen -DR isotype on Naturel Killer cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 69 on Naturel Killer cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 56 on Naturel Killer cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 57 on Naturel Killer cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 14 on Naturel Killer cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Membrane expression of cluster of differentiation 16 on Naturel Killer cells compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Number of regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25hiCD127loFoxP3+).

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Percentage of regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25hiCD127loFoxP3+).

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Immunoglobulin A compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Immunoglobulin G compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Immunoglobulin M compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Soluble cluster of differentiation 14 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Soluble cluster of differentiation 163 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Ultrasensitive C-Reactive Protein compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Soluble tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor type I compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating E-selectin (cluster of differentiation 62E) compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating InterCellular Adhesion Molecule-1 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interferon alpha compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interferon beta compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interferon gamma compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-1 alpha compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-1 beta compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-4 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-6 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-8 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-10 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-12p70 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-13 compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Interleukin-17A compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Induced Protein 10 (C-X-C motif chemokine 10) compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2) compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 3) compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating Macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta (C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 4) compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of circulating P-selectin compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of tumor necrosis factor alpha compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of tissue plasminogen activator compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of soluble form of endothelial protein C receptor compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

  • Rate of D-Dimers compared to normal values (based on 150 healthy volunteers previously sampled)

    Quantified by flow cytometry; % variation / normal values

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (31)

  • Compare the immune activation phenotype (defined in primary outcome) of patients affected by COVID-19 before any respiratory distress against that of 150 volunteers from the general population (data already existing).

    Day 0

  • Compare the immune activation phenotype (defined in primary outcome) of patients affected by COVID-19 with respiratory failure against versus those without respiratory failure

    Day 0

  • Mortality rate

    End of study (2021)

  • Comparison of E-selectin levels from plasma and the supernatant of PBMC activated or not by lipopolysaccharide and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B against norms previously established from 16 healthy subjects

    Day 0

  • Comparison of Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor levels from plasma and the supernatant of PBMC activated or not by lipopolysaccharide and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B against norms previously established from 16 healthy subjects

    Day 0

  • +26 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (6)

Patients SARS-CoV-2 with respiratory failure

Patients in intensive care

Other: Immunological profiling

Patients SARS-CoV-2 without respiratory failure

Patients hospitalized in normal hospital wards

Other: Immunological profiling

HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS

HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS

Other: Immunological profiling

NON-COVID-19 PATIENTS

Patient hospitalized at the CHU of Nîmes for an infection by a virus other than SARS-CoV-2

Other: Immunological profiling

PAUCISYMPTOMATIC SARS-COV-2+ PATIENTS

Patient positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR at the CHU of Nîmes and presenting at most moderate clinical signs without respiratory insufficiency (O2 saturation greater than or equal to 96%) during the confinement period

Other: Immunological profiling

convalescent patients

Additional 1-year follow-up visit

Other: Immunological profiling

Interventions

The immune activation phenotype will be assessed using a standardized panel of soluble and membrane immune activation markers

HEALTHY VOLUNTEERSNON-COVID-19 PATIENTSPAUCISYMPTOMATIC SARS-COV-2+ PATIENTSPatients SARS-CoV-2 with respiratory failurePatients SARS-CoV-2 without respiratory failureconvalescent patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients in intensive care or normal hospitalization at the CHU de Nîmes for SARS-CoV-2 infection, confirmed by PT-PCR or by an antigen test Healthy Volunteers

You may qualify if:

  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • Patient hospitalized in respiratory resuscitation or in the service of Infectious and Tropical Diseases of the CHU de Nîmes with infection by SARS-CoV-2, confirmed by RT-PCR or by an antigen test.

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient is under safeguard of justice
  • Patient already under ventilation transferred from another center

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU de Nimes

Nîmes, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Andre S, Picard M, Cezar R, Roux-Dalvai F, Alleaume-Butaux A, Soundaramourty C, Cruz AS, Mendes-Frias A, Gotti C, Leclercq M, Nicolas A, Tauzin A, Carvalho A, Capela C, Pedrosa J, Castro AG, Kundura L, Loubet P, Sotto A, Muller L, Lefrant JY, Roger C, Claret PG, Duvnjak S, Tran TA, Racine G, Zghidi-Abouzid O, Nioche P, Silvestre R, Droit A, Mammano F, Corbeau P, Estaquier J. T cell apoptosis characterizes severe Covid-19 disease. Cell Death Differ. 2022 Aug;29(8):1486-1499. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00936-x. Epub 2022 Jan 22.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells

MeSH Terms

Conditions

COVID-19Respiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pneumonia, ViralPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsVirus DiseasesCoronavirus InfectionsCoronaviridae InfectionsNidovirales InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Study Officials

  • Pierre Corbeau

    CHU Nimes

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2020

First Posted

April 17, 2020

Study Start

April 9, 2020

Primary Completion

December 12, 2022

Study Completion

December 12, 2022

Last Updated

December 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations