NCT04350385

Brief Summary

The objective of the study was to determine the effects of plyometric training on agility in national cricket players. The study design was Randomized Controlled Trial. 40 cricket players were included in the study through open epi tool out of which n=20 players were in experimental group and n=20 players were in control group. Assessments were taken as baseline on first week, on third week and on sixth week by performing few exercises such as Illinois Agility Run test, T test and Vertical jump test.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 20, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 14, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

April 14, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

AgilityDose ResponcePlyometric training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Agility T test

    In T test players have to run 40 yards and time will be noted in seconds. Rating starts from \>11.5 seconds (poor) to \<9.5 seconds (excellent).

    6th week

  • Illinios agility test

    Player have to run about 60 meters and time will be noted in seconds with rating poor \>18.8 seconds and excellent \<15.9 seconds.

    6th week

  • vertical jump height

    The testing subject stood on side of wall and reached her hand at it max. The foot was kept flat on the ground. The finger tip of hand was marked as standing normal max. Distance with foot flat. This was recorded as standing reach height.

    6th week

Study Arms (2)

Group 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Agility Training

Other: Agility training

Group 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

.Conventional intervention

Other: Conventional

Interventions

In experimental group, 30 meter sprint test will be used as intervention with complexity in different stages. Test 1 was a straight sprint and tests 2-7 involved multiple changes of direction. Tests 2-7 were designed to involve progressively greater change-of-direction complexity by increasing either the angle of directional change and/or the number of changes of direction. In experimental group, 6 weeks of intervention will be done on alternate days and assessment will be done on 1st, 3rd \& 6th week.

Group 1

In group B, Conventional intervention was given to the players under the supervision of Physical Therapist that includes warm-up, strength training, agility training and cool down. In control group, 6 weeks of intervention will be done on alternate days and assessment will be done on 1st, 3rd \& 6th week

Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18-25 Years.
  • Males
  • Those who had minimum one year of experience in domestic cricket(first class)

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Players undergone surgery or had accident within last 6 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Riphah International University

Islamabad, Federal, 44000, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Rae K, Orchard J. The Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) version 10. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 May;17(3):201-4. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318059b536.

    PMID: 17513912BACKGROUND
  • Karppinen S, editor Strength training for fast bowlers: Resistance to resistance training. 1 of 1-Conference of Science, Medicine & Coaching in Cricket 2010; 2010

    BACKGROUND
  • Young WB, McDowell MH, Scarlett BJ. Specificity of sprint and agility training methods. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Aug;15(3):315-9.

    PMID: 11710657BACKGROUND
  • Chelladurai P. Manifestations of agility. Journal of the Canadian Association of Health, Physical Education and Recreation. 1976;42(3):36-41.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chelladurai P, Yuhasz M, Sipura R. The reactive agility test. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1977;44(3_suppl):1319-24.

    BACKGROUND
  • Thomas JR, Silverman S, Nelson J. Research methods in physical activity, 7E: Human kinetics; 2015.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hortobagyi T, Katch FI, LaChance PF. Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58(7):749-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00637387.

    PMID: 2737196BACKGROUND
  • Buttifant D, Graham K, Cross K, editors. Agility and speed measurement in soccer players are two different performance parameters. Fourth World Congress of Science and Football; 1999.

    BACKGROUND
  • Draper J. The 505 test: A test for agility in horizontal plane. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1985;17(1):15-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mayhew J, Piper F, Schwegler T, Ball T. Contributions of speed, agility and body composition to anaerobic power measurement in college football players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 1989;3(4):101-6.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hilsendager DR, Strow MH, Ackerman KJ. Comparison of speed, stength, and agility exercises in the development of agility. Res Q. 1969 Mar;40(1):71-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5252467BACKGROUND
  • Craig BW. What is the scientific basis of speed and agility? Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2004;26(3):13-4.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gabbard C, LeBlanc E, Lowy S. Physical education for children: Building the foundation: Prentice-Hall; 1994

    BACKGROUND
  • Singer RN. Motor learning and human performance: An application to physical education skills: Macmillan; 1975.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Athletic Injuries

Interventions

Congresses as Topic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OrganizationsHealth Care Economics and Organizations

Study Officials

  • Muhammad Faheem Afzal, *PHD

    Riphah International University Islamabad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2020

First Posted

April 17, 2020

Study Start

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

February 20, 2020

Last Updated

April 21, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations