Dose Response of Plyometric Training on Agility in Cricket Players
Effects of Dose Response of Plyometric Training on Agility in Cricket Players
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the study was to determine the effects of plyometric training on agility in national cricket players. The study design was Randomized Controlled Trial. 40 cricket players were included in the study through open epi tool out of which n=20 players were in experimental group and n=20 players were in control group. Assessments were taken as baseline on first week, on third week and on sixth week by performing few exercises such as Illinois Agility Run test, T test and Vertical jump test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2020
CompletedApril 21, 2020
April 1, 2020
5 months
April 14, 2020
April 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Agility T test
In T test players have to run 40 yards and time will be noted in seconds. Rating starts from \>11.5 seconds (poor) to \<9.5 seconds (excellent).
6th week
Illinios agility test
Player have to run about 60 meters and time will be noted in seconds with rating poor \>18.8 seconds and excellent \<15.9 seconds.
6th week
vertical jump height
The testing subject stood on side of wall and reached her hand at it max. The foot was kept flat on the ground. The finger tip of hand was marked as standing normal max. Distance with foot flat. This was recorded as standing reach height.
6th week
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALAgility Training
Group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATOR.Conventional intervention
Interventions
In experimental group, 30 meter sprint test will be used as intervention with complexity in different stages. Test 1 was a straight sprint and tests 2-7 involved multiple changes of direction. Tests 2-7 were designed to involve progressively greater change-of-direction complexity by increasing either the angle of directional change and/or the number of changes of direction. In experimental group, 6 weeks of intervention will be done on alternate days and assessment will be done on 1st, 3rd \& 6th week.
In group B, Conventional intervention was given to the players under the supervision of Physical Therapist that includes warm-up, strength training, agility training and cool down. In control group, 6 weeks of intervention will be done on alternate days and assessment will be done on 1st, 3rd \& 6th week
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18-25 Years.
- Males
- Those who had minimum one year of experience in domestic cricket(first class)
You may not qualify if:
- \- Players undergone surgery or had accident within last 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah International University
Islamabad, Federal, 44000, Pakistan
Related Publications (14)
Rae K, Orchard J. The Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) version 10. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 May;17(3):201-4. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318059b536.
PMID: 17513912BACKGROUNDKarppinen S, editor Strength training for fast bowlers: Resistance to resistance training. 1 of 1-Conference of Science, Medicine & Coaching in Cricket 2010; 2010
BACKGROUNDYoung WB, McDowell MH, Scarlett BJ. Specificity of sprint and agility training methods. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Aug;15(3):315-9.
PMID: 11710657BACKGROUNDChelladurai P. Manifestations of agility. Journal of the Canadian Association of Health, Physical Education and Recreation. 1976;42(3):36-41.
BACKGROUNDChelladurai P, Yuhasz M, Sipura R. The reactive agility test. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1977;44(3_suppl):1319-24.
BACKGROUNDThomas JR, Silverman S, Nelson J. Research methods in physical activity, 7E: Human kinetics; 2015.
BACKGROUNDHortobagyi T, Katch FI, LaChance PF. Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Evidence for a general strength component. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58(7):749-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00637387.
PMID: 2737196BACKGROUNDButtifant D, Graham K, Cross K, editors. Agility and speed measurement in soccer players are two different performance parameters. Fourth World Congress of Science and Football; 1999.
BACKGROUNDDraper J. The 505 test: A test for agility in horizontal plane. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1985;17(1):15-8.
BACKGROUNDMayhew J, Piper F, Schwegler T, Ball T. Contributions of speed, agility and body composition to anaerobic power measurement in college football players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 1989;3(4):101-6.
BACKGROUNDHilsendager DR, Strow MH, Ackerman KJ. Comparison of speed, stength, and agility exercises in the development of agility. Res Q. 1969 Mar;40(1):71-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 5252467BACKGROUNDCraig BW. What is the scientific basis of speed and agility? Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2004;26(3):13-4.
BACKGROUNDGabbard C, LeBlanc E, Lowy S. Physical education for children: Building the foundation: Prentice-Hall; 1994
BACKGROUNDSinger RN. Motor learning and human performance: An application to physical education skills: Macmillan; 1975.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammad Faheem Afzal, *PHD
Riphah International University Islamabad
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2020
First Posted
April 17, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 20, 2020
Last Updated
April 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share