NCT04343716

Brief Summary

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent form of arthritis and race is a risk factor for poor outcomes. African-Americans (AAs) report greater OA-related disability and pain severity compared to their Non-Hispanic White (NHW) counterparts. These disparities are reinforced through social and biological mechanisms, ultimately resulting in dramatic racial disparities in pain experience and associated quality of life. Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) reduce inflammation and pain independent of weight loss, but significant racial differences exist in metabolism that are rarely addressed in diet interventions. The overall objective of the proposed study is to determine whether the beneficial effects of an LCD for knee OA pain are related to race. The investigators will recruit 20 adult women (65-75) with knee OA with equal representation across racial groups (10 AA, 10 NHW). Following one week of diet and pain self-report, the investigators will assess quality of life, depression, experienced pain and evoked pain. Participants will be placed on a LCD wherein all meals and snacks will be delivered weekly after consult with study personnel. Participants will return every 3 weeks for testing during the 6-week intervention with blood drawn at baseline and at the conclusion of the 6-week diet. Blood will be assayed for oxidative stress markers. This will be the first assessment of racial differences in the efficacy of a LCD to reduce knee OA pain. Objective 1: To determine whether the LCD reduces pain after 6 weeks. Hypothesis: The LCD will significantly reduce evoked and self-reported pain. Objective 2: To determine whether the benefits of the LCD differ based on race. Hypothesis 1: The LCD will reduce evoked and self-reported pain more in AA than in NHW. Hypothesis 2: AAs will experience greater improvements in depression, quality of life, pain interference and show more weight loss than NHWs. Objective 3: To determine whether the LCD has a differential impact on oxidative stress by race. Hypothesis 1: The LCD will significantly reduce oxidative stress over 6 weeks. Hypothesis 2: AAs will show greater reductions in oxidative stress than NHWs. The reduction in oxidative stress will be correlated with reduction in evoked pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 6, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 13, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2020

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 18, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 18, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 9, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

April 6, 2020

Results QC Date

September 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 31, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

dietchronic painknee osteoarthritisracial differences

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • WOMAC Pain Change

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score is a 0-20 score with higher scores reflecting more severe pain. Questions 1-5 are summed to provide a WOMAC pain score. Change scores will be calculated. The week 6 WOMAC pain subscale score was subtracted from the baseline score to obtain a difference score. Numbers closer to zero indicate no change.

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • BPI Pain Change

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain score is a 0-40 score with higher scores reflecting more pain. Questions 3-6 are scored on 0-10 and are summed to provide an overall pain score. The week 6 score was subtracted from the baseline score to obtain a difference score. Numbers closer to zero indicate no change.

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • WOMAC Physical Function

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • BPI Pain Interference Change

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • TS Pain Intensity Change

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • RCS Pain Intensity Change

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • PHQ-9 Depression Change

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

Other Outcomes (5)

  • RCS Time to Completion Change

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • TW Pain Intensity Change

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • TW Time to Completion Change

    Baseline (week 0), immediately after the intervention (6 weeks)

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

White women

EXPERIMENTAL

White women aged 65-75 with knee OA

Behavioral: Low-carbohydrate diet

Black women

EXPERIMENTAL

Black women aged 65-75 with knee OA

Behavioral: Low-carbohydrate diet

Interventions

A diet low in daily carbohydrates (\<40 grams/day) provided as prepared meals.

Black womenWhite women

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years - 75 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of knee OA
  • pain in at least 4/7 days/week for the past 3 months
  • age between 65-75
  • average daily consumption of \>100 g carbohydrates
  • understanding of verbal and written English
  • self-identification as either AA or NHW
  • BMI between 25 and 40 kg/m2

You may not qualify if:

  • diabetes
  • unwillingness to follow prescribed diets
  • recent weight change (\>4 kg in past month)
  • currently on a diet
  • history of eating disorders or other psychiatric disorders
  • digestive diseases
  • difficulty chewing or swallowing
  • reliance on others for meal preparation
  • cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
  • daily opioid pain medications
  • use of medications known to alter metabolism or digestion (e.g., proton-pump inhibitors)
  • use of anti-hypertensive medications that affect glucose tolerance
  • use of tobacco
  • participation in extreme exercise
  • knee replacement

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Strath LJ, Jones CD, Philip George A, Lukens SL, Morrison SA, Soleymani T, Locher JL, Gower BA, Sorge RE. The Effect of Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets on Pain in Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):150-160. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz022.

  • Wiggins AM, Strath LJ, McPherson GE, Gower BA, Goss AM, Goodin BR, Sorge RE. The effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on evoked pain and quality of life in Non-Hispanic black women with knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1043. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08170-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeChronic Pain

Interventions

Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diet TherapyNutrition TherapyTherapeuticsDietNutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological Phenomena

Limitations and Caveats

This was a pilot study with a small sample size. Due to recruiting issues around the pandemic and after, we were not able to recruit NWH women into the study in numbers to allow for our planned analyses. Thus, the resulting investigation was determined to be focused on NHB women and assessed as pre-post analyses. Blood samples were not taken, so physiological measures were not possible.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Robert Sorge
Organization
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study Officials

  • Robert E Sorge, PhD

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: All participants assigned to a single diet intervention. Between-groups differences and within-group changes will be assessed.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2020

First Posted

April 13, 2020

Study Start

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion

September 18, 2023

Study Completion

September 18, 2023

Last Updated

January 9, 2025

Results First Posted

January 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Following our extended analysis period, de-identified data will be made available, as well as the variable key, to the scientific community. Before this time, a request for data sharing will be assessed by study personnel (PI and Co-Is) as needed. These requests will be evaluated based on scientific merit and overlap with the aims of the current study.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
For 5 years following final data analysis
Access Criteria
De-identified data can be made available on encrypted servers for researchers whose research plans do not overlap with the aims of the current project. Requests will be assessed by the PI and Co-Is as needed.

Locations