Virtual Reality and Older Adult Knee OA
The Feasibility & Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Reducing Pain for Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
At the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) Pain Management Center (PMC), knee OA is one of the most common conditions causing older adults to experience chronic pain. At this site, the core treatments of education, physical activity, and weight management are addressed, and then both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options are available for patients living with chronic pain. Pharmacological treatments, such as topical and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, steroidal and non-steroidal injections, and prescription medications are currently the most commonly used treatments for chronic pain, but are also associated with limited benefits and dangerous side effects, such as addiction. Clients can also opt for nonpharmacological pain treatments at the PMC, such as acupuncture, reiki, physical therapy, and yoga, which are currently being researched at the clinic as well. The critical gap addressed with this pilot study is the need for additional safe and feasible treatment options for the growing population of older adults with chronic knee OA, as there is limited existing research on the effects of nonpharmacological treatments on this population. While past studies at the PMC have looked at the physiological mechanisms involved with chronic knee OA and the older adult population, the site has had limited funding to research nonpharmacological treatments such as virtual reality. In fact, there is limited evidence in the literature on the effects of virtual reality in reducing pain specifically for the older adult population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2021
CompletedFebruary 14, 2022
February 1, 2022
2 months
June 10, 2021
February 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] (Change)
Measures the intensity of pain on an 11-point scale, ranging from 0-10. 0 is no "pain", and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine".
pre-intervention, within 20 minutes after intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (Change)
Fifteen-item self-report questionnaire that measures participant's various levels of pain severity in the past 24 hours, and perception of the degree to which pain prevents participation in important daily activities (e.g. work, socialization) and enjoyment of life. Eight pain severity items are rated on a 11-point scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Seven pain interference items are rated on a 11-point scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).
pre-intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention
PROMIS Emotional Distress - Short Form (Change)
24-item self report questionnaire that measures how often participant experiences feelings related to depression, anxiety and anger in the past seven days. These questionnaires have been modified to ask about the past 24 hours. The questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (never) to 5 (always). This questionnaire will assess the participant's psychological state.
pre-intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention
Positive and Negative Affect Scale [PANAS] (Change)
This ten-item self-report questionnaire measures the extent to which the participant felt various emotions right now. This questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). This questionnaire will assess the participant's psychological state at all three data collection points.
pre-intervention, within 20 minutes after intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention
Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] (Change)
1-item self-report questionnaire that measures subject's pain since the start of the study intervention using a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (very much improved) to 6 (very much worse). This questionnaire will determine if the subject found the VR intervention to be helpful in reducing their pain.
within 20 minutes after intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention
Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS] (Change)
Thirteen-item self-report questionnaire that collects data on the types of thoughts and feelings the participants have when in pain. The participants will be asked to rank the degree to which they have certain thoughts and feelings when they are in pain using a 5-point Likert scale, from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time).
pre-intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention
Survey of Pain Attitudes - Brief [SOPA]
30-item self-report questionnaire that measures participant's perceptions of and attitudes towards their pain. The participants will be asked to rank how true each statement is for them using a 5-point Likert scale, from 0 (very untrue) to 4 (very true).
pre-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Baseline Survey
pre-intervention
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire [SSQ]21
within 20 minutes after intervention
User Engagement Scale [UES]22
within 20 minutes after intervention
iGroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)
within 20 minutes after intervention
Meditation Experience Questionnaire (MEQ)
within 20 minutes after intervention
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
All Participants
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be set up in the VR equipment. They will engage and follow along with a 10-20 minute guided meditation through the VR. The meditation program may include simulated movement, relaxing music, and the voice of a meditation guide. The research team member will supervise the session, ensuring safety of the subject is maintained.
Interventions
Participants will be set up in the VR equipment. They will engage and follow along with a 10-20 minute guided meditation through the VR. The meditation program may include simulated movement, relaxing music, and the voice of a meditation guide. The research team member will supervise the session, ensuring safety of the subject is maintained.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults over the age of 60 years old (no upper limit)
- Diagnosis of chronic knee osteoarthritis with pain in at least one knee
- English-speaking
- Willing and able to visit the PMC campus to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Received steroid injection within 2 weeks of VR session
- Unwilling to put on VR headset
- Diagnosed seizure disorder
- Cognitive impairment
- Hearing/visual deficit
- Active, contagious skin infection
- Eye infections
- Has a pacemaker or defibrillator
- Has a hearing aid
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tufts Universitylead
- Brigham and Women's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brigham & Women's Pain Management Center
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467, United States
Related Publications (16)
Appel L, Appel E, Bogler O, Wiseman M, Cohen L, Ein N, Abrams HB, Campos JL. Older Adults With Cognitive and/or Physical Impairments Can Benefit From Immersive Virtual Reality Experiences: A Feasibility Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 15;6:329. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00329. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 32010701BACKGROUNDBillups, E. (2019, September 30). Hijacking the brain: Scientists are using VR to treat chronic pain. Spectrum News NY1. https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/exploring-your-health/2019/09/23/hijacking-the-brain--scientists-are-using-vr-to-treat-chronic-pain
BACKGROUNDBjordal JM, Klovning A, Ljunggren AE, Slordal L. Short-term efficacy of pharmacotherapeutic interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2007 Feb;11(2):125-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 May 8.
PMID: 16682240BACKGROUNDHeidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011 Spring;2(2):205-12.
PMID: 24024017BACKGROUNDHoffman HG, Meyer WJ 3rd, Ramirez M, Roberts L, Seibel EJ, Atzori B, Sharar SR, Patterson DR. Feasibility of articulated arm mounted Oculus Rift Virtual Reality goggles for adjunctive pain control during occupational therapy in pediatric burn patients. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):397-401. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0058.
PMID: 24892204BACKGROUNDJones T, Moore T, Choo J. The Impact of Virtual Reality on Chronic Pain. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0167523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167523. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27997539BACKGROUNDKennedy, S., & Moran, M. (2010). Pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. BCMJ, 52(8), 404-9. https://bcmj.org/articles/pharmacological-treatment-osteoarthritis-hip-and-knee
BACKGROUNDMalloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
PMID: 20691523BACKGROUNDMaskey M, Rodgers J, Grahame V, Glod M, Honey E, Kinnear J, Labus M, Milne J, Minos D, McConachie H, Parr JR. A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial of Immersive Virtual Reality Treatment with Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Specific Phobias in Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 May;49(5):1912-1927. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3861-x.
PMID: 30767156BACKGROUNDMendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, Cleeland C. Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.002. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
PMID: 16051509BACKGROUNDNakad, L., & Rakel, B. (2019). (271) Attitudes of Older Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain towards Immersive Virtual Reality. The Journal of Pain, 20(4), S42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.01.193
BACKGROUNDNIH Pain Consortium. (n.d.). Chronic pain in older adults. https://www.painconsortium.nih.gov/sites/default/files/aging_and_chronic_pain_infographic_508.pdf
BACKGROUNDSakhare AR, Yang V, Stradford J, Tsang I, Ravichandran R, Pa J. Cycling and Spatial Navigation in an Enriched, Immersive 3D Virtual Park Environment: A Feasibility Study in Younger and Older Adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Aug 16;11:218. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00218. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31474851BACKGROUNDSharma L. Osteoarthritis of the Knee. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 7;384(1):51-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1903768. No abstract available.
PMID: 33406330BACKGROUNDZhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):137-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013.
PMID: 18279766BACKGROUNDSarkar TD, Edwards RR, Baker N. The feasibility and effectiveness of virtual reality meditation on reducing chronic pain for older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Pain Pract. 2022 Sep;22(7):631-641. doi: 10.1111/papr.13144. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
PMID: 35750655DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nancy A Baker
Tufts University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chair of and Associate Professor in Department of Occupational Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2021
First Posted
July 7, 2021
Study Start
June 19, 2021
Primary Completion
August 16, 2021
Study Completion
September 10, 2021
Last Updated
February 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share