NCT04951661

Brief Summary

At the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) Pain Management Center (PMC), knee OA is one of the most common conditions causing older adults to experience chronic pain. At this site, the core treatments of education, physical activity, and weight management are addressed, and then both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options are available for patients living with chronic pain. Pharmacological treatments, such as topical and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, steroidal and non-steroidal injections, and prescription medications are currently the most commonly used treatments for chronic pain, but are also associated with limited benefits and dangerous side effects, such as addiction. Clients can also opt for nonpharmacological pain treatments at the PMC, such as acupuncture, reiki, physical therapy, and yoga, which are currently being researched at the clinic as well. The critical gap addressed with this pilot study is the need for additional safe and feasible treatment options for the growing population of older adults with chronic knee OA, as there is limited existing research on the effects of nonpharmacological treatments on this population. While past studies at the PMC have looked at the physiological mechanisms involved with chronic knee OA and the older adult population, the site has had limited funding to research nonpharmacological treatments such as virtual reality. In fact, there is limited evidence in the literature on the effects of virtual reality in reducing pain specifically for the older adult population.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2021

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 19, 2021

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 7, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 16, 2021

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 14, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

June 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Knee OsteoarthritisVirtual RealityPainKnee Pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Pain Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] (Change)

    Measures the intensity of pain on an 11-point scale, ranging from 0-10. 0 is no "pain", and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine".

    pre-intervention, within 20 minutes after intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention

  • Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (Change)

    Fifteen-item self-report questionnaire that measures participant's various levels of pain severity in the past 24 hours, and perception of the degree to which pain prevents participation in important daily activities (e.g. work, socialization) and enjoyment of life. Eight pain severity items are rated on a 11-point scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Seven pain interference items are rated on a 11-point scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).

    pre-intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention

  • PROMIS Emotional Distress - Short Form (Change)

    24-item self report questionnaire that measures how often participant experiences feelings related to depression, anxiety and anger in the past seven days. These questionnaires have been modified to ask about the past 24 hours. The questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (never) to 5 (always). This questionnaire will assess the participant's psychological state.

    pre-intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention

  • Positive and Negative Affect Scale [PANAS] (Change)

    This ten-item self-report questionnaire measures the extent to which the participant felt various emotions right now. This questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely). This questionnaire will assess the participant's psychological state at all three data collection points.

    pre-intervention, within 20 minutes after intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention

  • Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] (Change)

    1-item self-report questionnaire that measures subject's pain since the start of the study intervention using a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (very much improved) to 6 (very much worse). This questionnaire will determine if the subject found the VR intervention to be helpful in reducing their pain.

    within 20 minutes after intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention

  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS] (Change)

    Thirteen-item self-report questionnaire that collects data on the types of thoughts and feelings the participants have when in pain. The participants will be asked to rank the degree to which they have certain thoughts and feelings when they are in pain using a 5-point Likert scale, from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time).

    pre-intervention, 24-48 hour follow-up after intervention

  • Survey of Pain Attitudes - Brief [SOPA]

    30-item self-report questionnaire that measures participant's perceptions of and attitudes towards their pain. The participants will be asked to rank how true each statement is for them using a 5-point Likert scale, from 0 (very untrue) to 4 (very true).

    pre-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Baseline Survey

    pre-intervention

  • Simulator Sickness Questionnaire [SSQ]21

    within 20 minutes after intervention

  • User Engagement Scale [UES]22

    within 20 minutes after intervention

  • iGroup Presence Questionnaire (IPQ)

    within 20 minutes after intervention

  • Meditation Experience Questionnaire (MEQ)

    within 20 minutes after intervention

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

All Participants

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be set up in the VR equipment. They will engage and follow along with a 10-20 minute guided meditation through the VR. The meditation program may include simulated movement, relaxing music, and the voice of a meditation guide. The research team member will supervise the session, ensuring safety of the subject is maintained.

Device: Virtual Reality

Interventions

Participants will be set up in the VR equipment. They will engage and follow along with a 10-20 minute guided meditation through the VR. The meditation program may include simulated movement, relaxing music, and the voice of a meditation guide. The research team member will supervise the session, ensuring safety of the subject is maintained.

All Participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults over the age of 60 years old (no upper limit)
  • Diagnosis of chronic knee osteoarthritis with pain in at least one knee
  • English-speaking
  • Willing and able to visit the PMC campus to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Received steroid injection within 2 weeks of VR session
  • Unwilling to put on VR headset
  • Diagnosed seizure disorder
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Hearing/visual deficit
  • Active, contagious skin infection
  • Eye infections
  • Has a pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Has a hearing aid

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Brigham & Women's Pain Management Center

Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Appel L, Appel E, Bogler O, Wiseman M, Cohen L, Ein N, Abrams HB, Campos JL. Older Adults With Cognitive and/or Physical Impairments Can Benefit From Immersive Virtual Reality Experiences: A Feasibility Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 15;6:329. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00329. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 32010701BACKGROUND
  • Billups, E. (2019, September 30). Hijacking the brain: Scientists are using VR to treat chronic pain. Spectrum News NY1. https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/exploring-your-health/2019/09/23/hijacking-the-brain--scientists-are-using-vr-to-treat-chronic-pain

    BACKGROUND
  • Bjordal JM, Klovning A, Ljunggren AE, Slordal L. Short-term efficacy of pharmacotherapeutic interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. Eur J Pain. 2007 Feb;11(2):125-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 May 8.

    PMID: 16682240BACKGROUND
  • Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med. 2011 Spring;2(2):205-12.

    PMID: 24024017BACKGROUND
  • Hoffman HG, Meyer WJ 3rd, Ramirez M, Roberts L, Seibel EJ, Atzori B, Sharar SR, Patterson DR. Feasibility of articulated arm mounted Oculus Rift Virtual Reality goggles for adjunctive pain control during occupational therapy in pediatric burn patients. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):397-401. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0058.

    PMID: 24892204BACKGROUND
  • Jones T, Moore T, Choo J. The Impact of Virtual Reality on Chronic Pain. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0167523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167523. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27997539BACKGROUND
  • Kennedy, S., & Moran, M. (2010). Pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. BCMJ, 52(8), 404-9. https://bcmj.org/articles/pharmacological-treatment-osteoarthritis-hip-and-knee

    BACKGROUND
  • Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

    PMID: 20691523BACKGROUND
  • Maskey M, Rodgers J, Grahame V, Glod M, Honey E, Kinnear J, Labus M, Milne J, Minos D, McConachie H, Parr JR. A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial of Immersive Virtual Reality Treatment with Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Specific Phobias in Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 May;49(5):1912-1927. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3861-x.

    PMID: 30767156BACKGROUND
  • Mendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, Cleeland C. Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.002. Epub 2005 Jul 26.

    PMID: 16051509BACKGROUND
  • Nakad, L., & Rakel, B. (2019). (271) Attitudes of Older Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain towards Immersive Virtual Reality. The Journal of Pain, 20(4), S42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.01.193

    BACKGROUND
  • NIH Pain Consortium. (n.d.). Chronic pain in older adults. https://www.painconsortium.nih.gov/sites/default/files/aging_and_chronic_pain_infographic_508.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Sakhare AR, Yang V, Stradford J, Tsang I, Ravichandran R, Pa J. Cycling and Spatial Navigation in an Enriched, Immersive 3D Virtual Park Environment: A Feasibility Study in Younger and Older Adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Aug 16;11:218. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00218. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31474851BACKGROUND
  • Sharma L. Osteoarthritis of the Knee. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 7;384(1):51-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1903768. No abstract available.

    PMID: 33406330BACKGROUND
  • Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):137-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013.

    PMID: 18279766BACKGROUND
  • Sarkar TD, Edwards RR, Baker N. The feasibility and effectiveness of virtual reality meditation on reducing chronic pain for older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Pain Pract. 2022 Sep;22(7):631-641. doi: 10.1111/papr.13144. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneePain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Nancy A Baker

    Tufts University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chair of and Associate Professor in Department of Occupational Therapy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2021

First Posted

July 7, 2021

Study Start

June 19, 2021

Primary Completion

August 16, 2021

Study Completion

September 10, 2021

Last Updated

February 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations