Prospective Randomized Trial of Irritative Symptoms Severity Assessment After (HoLEP) Versus ThuFLEP
PRISSA
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that the functional outcomes of both techniques are comparable. However, ThuFLEP might increase speed recovery of postoperative irritation and early stress urinary incontinence according to the Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) because of minimal tissue penetration depth of TFL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2021
CompletedJuly 22, 2021
July 1, 2021
1.3 years
March 12, 2020
July 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
severity of urinary incontinence
Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (higher score means worse incontinence)
change from 1 week to 6 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
rate of intra- and perioperative adverse events
6 months follow up
surgery duration
during surgery
hemoglobin drop
1 day after surgery
catheter stay
1 week after surgery
hospitalization length
1 week after surgery
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ThuFLEP
EXPERIMENTALPatients who underwent thulium fiber enucleation of the prostate
HoLEP
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
Interventions
enucleation of the BPH according to standard procedure protocol
enucleation of the BPH according to standard procedure protocol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- LUTS presence, proven by:
- IPSS questionnaire (Score \>20);
- OR uroflowmetry result (Qmax \<10 ml/s);
You may not qualify if:
- Prostate volume \> 120 cc
- Prostate cancer on pathology;
- Urethral strictures;
- Bladder calculi;
- Prior prostate surgery;
- Neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University.
Moscow, 119991, Russia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy director for research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2020
First Posted
April 13, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2020
Primary Completion
July 10, 2021
Study Completion
October 10, 2021
Last Updated
July 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share