Remote Assessment of Physical Function
2 other identifiers
observational
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the validity and reliability of using videoconferencing to assess physical performance tests self-administered by older cancer survivors in their own homes. This remote assessment will be compared to the traditional face-to-face (i.e., in-person) assessment and to accelerometer data.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 13, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 13, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 6, 2024
CompletedMay 24, 2024
May 1, 2024
2 years
April 1, 2020
January 9, 2024
May 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Validation - 30-second Chair Stand Test
Comparison of remote assessment to the traditional face-to-face (i.e., in-person; direct observer) assessment. Phase 2 will enroll 10-20 participants, depending on the point at which no new information is learned about the use of the toolkit (including instructions). Comparisons will be made between the direct observer and the remote assessor. The 30-second chair stand test involves standing up from a chair and sitting down as quickly and safely as possible, preferably without the use of upper extremity support. It is measured by the number of times a person comes to a full standing position from a chair in 30 seconds. The outcome is the difference in the number of chair stands counted between the direct observer and the remote assessor.
1 day
Validation - Timed Up & Go Test
Comparison of remote assessment to the traditional face-to-face (i.e., in-person; direct observer) assessment. Phase 2 will enroll 10-20 participants, depending on the point at which no new information is learned about the use of the toolkit (including instructions). The Timed Up \& Go test involves standing up from a standard armchair, walking 10 feet, turning around (180° turn), and walking back to the chair and sitting down. Comparisons will be made between the direct observer and the remote assessor. The outcome is the difference in the number of seconds counted between the direct observer and the remote assessor.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reliability - Percentage of Participants Who Successfully Completed the Revised Protocol.
3 months
Study Arms (4)
Phase I
First, we will test proof-of-concept that participants will be able to follow the testing protocol and use the tablet computer to communicate with the investigator (10-12 participants). The test protocol will be refined based on what is learned after a minimum of 10 participants. We anticipate no more than 12 participants needed for this phase.
Phase II
Next, 10-20 new participants will be enrolled to evaluate the validity of videoconference vs. face-to-face assessment (i.e., direct observation) of physical performance. Communication will occur between the remote assessor and the participant. The direct observer will not communicate directly to the participant, unless there is a safety issue. After completing 10 participants without a major change in the test protocol, we will proceed to the next phase.
Phase III
This phase involves participants repeating the test protocol, but without the face-to-face assessment (i.e., direct observation). This will test the ability of the participant to receive the box of test instructions and materials in the mail, unpack the box, communicate with the remote assessor via videoconferencing, pack up the box, and return it (postage paid) to the study team. This step will involve 5-10 participants from Phases 1 and 2, who have provided approval for future contact (see approved Future Contact form). Once 5 participants have successfully and safely completed the test protocol, we will proceed to Phase 4.
Phase IV
This phase is the same as Phase 3, except it includes newly enrolled participants, i.e., representing the first-time participants have enrolled/participated in this study. This will eliminate the practice effect that will occur in phase 3. This step will enroll 5-10 participants.
Interventions
An android tablet with Wi-Fi and cellular will be used to compare videoconferencing with face-to-face assessment of 2 timed, physical performance tests. The physical performance tests include the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST) and the Timed Up \& Go (TUG) test. The TUG test is measured as the time to stand from a standard arm chair, walk 10 feet, turn around, return to start and sit down. The 30s-CST is measured as the number of times a person comes to a full standing position from a chair in 30 seconds, as quickly as possible, without using ones' hands.
An android tablet with Wi-Fi and cellular will be mailed to study participants to remotely assess 2 timed, physical performance tests. The physical performance tests include the 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST) and the Timed Up \& Go (TUG) test. The TUG test is measured as the time to stand from a standard arm chair, walk 10 feet, turn around, return to start and sit down. The 30s-CST is measured as the number of times a person comes to a full standing position from a chair in 30 seconds, as quickly as possible, without using ones' hands.
Eligibility Criteria
Older cancer survivors
You may qualify if:
- Residence in New Mexico
- Previous diagnosis of cancer, completed primary treatment (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy), and not currently being treated for a recurrence.
- Mild-to-moderate physical functional impairment (≥2 functions limited a lot or limited a little on the Short Form 36-item Physical Function Subscale)
- Able to speak, read, \& understand English
- Participating in less than 120 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity
- Living independently and capable of walking 3 blocks without stopping to rest.
- Availability of a family member or friend to be present (for safety) during remote assessment of performance tests (Phases III and IV only)
- No severe impairments or pre-existing medical limitations for engaging in daily light-intensity physical activity (e.g., severe orthopedic conditions, pending hip/knee replacement, chronic vertigo, dementia)
- No severe hearing or vision deficits that would inhibit communication with the research team via videoconferencing and tablet use.
- Willing to use a tablet computer and videoconferencing software to communicate with a study team member during the assessment.
- Enough space (14 feet by 3 feet) to safely conduct the physical function tests.
- Not at high risk for falls
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of New Mexicolead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Related Publications (1)
Blair CK, Harding E, Herman C, Boyce T, Demark-Wahnefried W, Davis S, Kinney AY, Pankratz VS. Remote Assessment of Functional Mobility and Strength in Older Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 1;9(9):e20834. doi: 10.2196/20834.
PMID: 32769075DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Cindy Blair
- Organization
- University of New Mexico
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cindy K Blair, PhD
University of New Mexico
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2020
First Posted
April 9, 2020
Study Start
November 20, 2019
Primary Completion
November 13, 2021
Study Completion
November 13, 2021
Last Updated
May 24, 2024
Results First Posted
March 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share