NCT04338490

Brief Summary

To verify the efficacy of manikins with feedback in the training of physicians and nurses in the courses of Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) authorized by the American Heart Association (AHA) when compared to the traditional training form.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
209

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 10, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2020

Conditions

Simulation Training

Keywords

cardiopulmonary ressuscitattioneducation medical continuingemergency medical servicessimulation trainingfeedback dummy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The feedback mannequim is as effective as an AHA instructor

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Feedback mannequim

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Feedback mannequimDEVICE

The intervention group received rcp training with their performance being evaluated in real time so that they could correct themselves

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul - Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90040-370, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Nolan JP, Soar J, Smith GB, Gwinnutt C, Parrott F, Power S, Harrison DA, Nixon E, Rowan K; National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Resuscitation. 2014 Aug;85(8):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

    PMID: 24746785BACKGROUND

  • Austin AL, Spalding CN, Landa KN, Myer BR, Cure D, Smith JE, Platt G, King HC. A Randomized Control Trial of Cardiopulmonary Feedback Devices and Their Impact on Infant Chest Compression Quality: A Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Feb;36(2):e79-e84. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001312.

    PMID: 29084067BACKGROUND

  • Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, Halperin HR, Hess EP, Moitra VK, Neumar RW, O'Neil BJ, Paxton JH, Silvers SM, White RD, Yannopoulos D, Donnino MW. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26472995BACKGROUND

  • Choi B, Asselin N, Pettit CC, Dannecker M, Machan JT, Merck DL, Merck LH, Suner S, Williams KA, Jay GD, Kobayashi L. Simulation-based Randomized Comparative Assessment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Bundle Completion by Emergency Medical Service Teams Using Standard Life Support or an Experimental Automation-assisted Approach. Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):365-375. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000178.

    PMID: 27509064BACKGROUND

  • Iskrzycki L, Smereka J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Barcala Furelos R, Abelarias Gomez C, Kaminska H, Wieczorek W, Szarpak L, Nadolny K, Galazkowski R, Ruetzler K, Ladny JR. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(3):574-579. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0255. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

    PMID: 29297195BACKGROUND

  • Kirkbright S, Finn J, Tohira H, Bremner A, Jacobs I, Celenza A. Audiovisual feedback device use by health care professionals during CPR: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials. Resuscitation. 2014 Apr;85(4):460-71. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

    PMID: 24361457BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Juarez Dr Neuhaus Barbisan

    Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2020

First Posted

April 8, 2020

Study Start

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion

July 1, 2019

Study Completion

November 10, 2019

Last Updated

September 22, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

BR(1)