Evaluation of Comfort Behavior Levels of Newborns With Artificial Intelligence Techniques
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study; It will be carried out with the aim of developing the artificial intelligence method, which allows automatic determination of comfort levels of newborns.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedApril 13, 2020
April 1, 2020
3 months
April 2, 2020
April 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Images of the newborn
Images will be taken to transfer behaviors of newborns to the computer. Attention will be paid to making face and body movements visible while taking the image.The camera will take 12 hours of view of each newborn.However, this period can be shortened as a result of preliminary work.
12 hours for each newborn
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Artificial intelligence techniques
Approximately 1 week for each newborn
Study Arms (1)
artificial intelligence techniques
EXPERIMENTALFacial and body movements of newborns will be recorded by camera, and images will be processed in computer environment by using artificial intelligence techniques. As a result, it is planned to create a technology that determines the comfort level of the newborn quickly and simply and can be used by the mobile device.
Interventions
it is planned to create a technology that determines the comfort level of the newborn quickly and simply, easy to use, time-saving and can be used by the mobile device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents' acceptance of their baby's participation in the study
- Having a baby born at 24-42 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Having a baby born before 24 weeks of gestation or after 42 weeks of gestation.
- Has received analgesic, muscle relaxant or sedative drug treatment that may affect comfort and behavior (last 24 hours)
- Newborn has serious neurological damage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (29)
Ambuel B, Hamlett KW, Marx CM, Blumer JL. Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the COMFORT scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992 Feb;17(1):95-109. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/17.1.95.
PMID: 1545324RESULTArroyo-Novoa CM, Figueroa-Ramos MI, Puntillo KA, Stanik-Hutt J, Thompson CL, White C, Wild LR. Pain related to tracheal suctioning in awake acutely and critically ill adults: a descriptive study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008 Feb;24(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
PMID: 17689249RESULTArslan, H., & Konuk Şener, D. (2009). Stigma, spiritüalite ve konfor kavramlarının Meleis' in kavram geliştirme sürecine göre irdelenmesi. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi, 2(1): 51-58.
RESULTAtalay, M., & Çelik, E. (2017). Büyük veri analizinde yapay zekâ ve makine öğrenmesi uygulamaları. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(22): 155-172.
RESULTAydın, Ş.E. (2017). Yapay zeka teknolojisi (yapay zekaların dünü bugünü yarını), Yüksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
RESULTBodur, G., & Kaya, H. (2017). Hemşirelerin gözüyle gelecek: 2050'li yıllar. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 33 (1): 27-38.
RESULTCoughlin M, Gibbins S, Hoath S. Core measures for developmentally supportive care in neonatal intensive care units: theory, precedence and practice. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2239-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05052.x.
PMID: 19686402RESULTÇınar Yücel Ş. (2011). Kolcaba'nın konfor kuramı. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, 27: 79-88.
RESULTÇimen, Ü. (2016). Solunum seslerinin yapay zekâ ortamında sınıflandırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Afyonkarahisar.
RESULTde Sousa Freire NB, Garcia JBS, Lamy ZC. Evaluation of analgesic effect of skin-to-skin contact compared to oral glucose in preterm neonates. Pain. 2008 Sep 30;139(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.031. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
PMID: 18434021RESULTHunter, J. (2010). Therapeutic positioning: neuromotor, physiologic, and sleep implications. Developmental care of newborns and infants. A guide for health professionals. 2nd edn. Glenview, IL: NANN: 283-312.
RESULTIsta E, van Dijk M, Tibboel D, de Hoog M. Assessment of sedation levels in pediatric intensive care patients can be improved by using the COMFORT "behavior" scale. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):58-63. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149318.40279.1A.
PMID: 15636661RESULTKahraman, A., Başbakkal, Z., & Yalaz, M. (2014). Yenidoğan konfor davranış ölçeği'nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Uluslararası Hakemli Hemşirelik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2).
RESULTKarabacak, Ü., & Acaroğlu, R. (2011). Konfor kuramı. Maltepe Üniversitesi Bilim ve Sanat Dergisi, 4(1): 197-202.
RESULTKarakaplan, S., & Yıldız, H. (2010). Doğum sonu konfor ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi, 3(1): 55-65.
RESULTKaya, U., Yılmaz, A., & Dikmen, Y. (2019). Sağlık alanında kullanılan derin öğrenme yöntemleri. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (16): 792-808.
RESULTKolcaba K, DiMarco MA. Comfort Theory and its application to pediatric nursing. Pediatr Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;31(3):187-94.
PMID: 16060582RESULTKolcaba K, Tilton C, Drouin C. Comfort Theory: a unifying framework to enhance the practice environment. J Nurs Adm. 2006 Nov;36(11):538-44. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200611000-00010.
PMID: 17099440RESULTKuğuoğlu, S., & Karabacak, Ü. (2008). Genel konfor ölçeğinin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması. İ.Ü.F.N. Hemşirelik Dergisi, 16 (61): 16-23.
RESULTKüçük Alemdar, D., & Güdücü Tüfekçi, F. (2015). Prematüre bebek konfor ölçeği'nin Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 12 (2): 142-148.
RESULTLosacco V, Cuttini M, Greisen G, Haumont D, Pallas-Alonso CR, Pierrat V, Warren I, Smit BJ, Westrup B, Sizun J; ESF Network. Heel blood sampling in European neonatal intensive care units: compliance with pain management guidelines. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 Jan;96(1):F65-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.186429.
PMID: 21177753RESULTMathai S, Natrajan N, Rajalakshmi NR. A comparative study of nonpharmacological methods to reduce pain in neonates. Indian Pediatr. 2006 Dec;43(12):1070-5.
PMID: 17202604RESULTMijwel, M. M. (2015). History of artificial intelligence. Computer science, college of science, 1-6.
RESULTSönmez, D. (2009). Pediatrik yoğun bakım ünitesinde endotrakeal aspirasyon ağrısının değerlendirilmes, Yüksek lisans tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
RESULTTerzi, B., Kaya, N. (2017). Konfor kuramı ve analizi. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 20: 1.
RESULTTutar Güven, Ş., & İşler Dalgıç, A. (2017). Prematüre yenidoğanlar için geliştirilmiş bireyselleştirilmiş destekleyici gelişimsel bakım programı. Uluslararası Hakemli Kadın Hastalıkları ve Anne Çocuk Sağlığı Dergisi, 9.
RESULTUga E, Candriella M, Perino A, Alloni V, Angilella G, Trada M, Ziliotto AM, Rossi MB, Tozzini D, Tripaldi C, Vaglio M, Grossi L, Allen M, Provera S. Heel lance in newborn during breastfeeding: an evaluation of analgesic effect of this procedure. Ital J Pediatr. 2008 Nov 18;34(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-34-3.
PMID: 19490654RESULTvan Dijk M, Roofthooft DW, Anand KJ, Guldemond F, de Graaf J, Simons S, de Jager Y, van Goudoever JB, Tibboel D. Taking up the challenge of measuring prolonged pain in (premature) neonates: the COMFORTneo scale seems promising. Clin J Pain. 2009 Sep;25(7):607-16. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a5b52a.
PMID: 19692803RESULTYıldırım, T. (2019). Sağlıkta dönüşüm ve yapay zekânın pediatriye yansımaları. Karadeniz Pediatri Günleri Kongre Özet Kitabı, 2 (1): 1-97.
RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
DENİZ YİĞİT, Res.Asst.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Researchers and family of newborns will know about all the details of the study. Verbal and written permission will be obtained from families.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2020
First Posted
April 7, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- It will be shared after the study is finished (About 2 years later)
- Access Criteria
- Being a healthcare professional working with newborns
At the end of the study, it is aimed to announce the artificial intelligence developed to measure comfort with the declaration to be made in international congresses. In this way, it is thought that the program will be used by healthcare professionals in different hospitals and neonatal clinics in these hospitals.