Long-term Improvement of Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients With Quality of Life Diagnosis and Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is the long-term implementation of a system with quality of life diagnosis and tailored therapeutic options in order to improve quality of life of patients with breast cancer during follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable quality-of-life
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable quality-of-life
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedNovember 5, 2020
November 1, 2020
2.6 years
March 26, 2020
November 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
proportion of patients with a need for QoL therapy
a need for QoL therapy is defined as a score \<50 points in at least one of eleven QoL dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 (scales: global quality of life, physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social functioning, pain, fatigue, financial situation, body image, arm symptoms); scores in each dimension are uniformly transformed to dimensions ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the negative (low functioning, high symptom burden) and 100 the positive end (high functioning, low symptom burden) of the continuum.
6 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer
Secondary Outcomes (3)
proportions of patients with a need for QoL therapy in each dimension of the QoL profile
3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer
patient evaluation
6 and 24 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer
physician evaluation
6 and 24 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer
Study Arms (1)
QoL diagnosis and therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe first quality of life (QoL) measurement is conducted in the hospital after surgery via a digital questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) on a tablet computer. Further QoL measures are accomplished via paper-pencil in the practice of the patient's physician during aftercare (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months after surgery). Paper questionnaires are transferred by fax to a local server, automatically processed, digitized and stored in a database, and transferred back to the physician's practice (email or fax depending on preference) in form of a QoL profile. The immediate response enables patient and physician to discuss the QoL profile right away. Specific therapeutic options for the treatment of QoL have been defined: psychotherapy, social counseling, pain therapy, physiotherapy, nutrition counseling, fitness. To provide continuous medical education, quality circles for each therapeutic option have been founded. Physicians receive a list with addresses of all quality circle members.
Interventions
The first quality of life (QoL) measurement is conducted in the hospital after surgery via a digital questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) on a tablet computer. Further QoL measures are accomplished via paper-pencil in the practice of the patient's physician during aftercare (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months after surgery). Paper questionnaires are transferred by fax to a local server, automatically processed, digitized and stored in a database, and transferred back to the physician's practice (email or fax depending on preference) in form of a QoL profile. The immediate response enables patient and physician to discuss the QoL profile right away. Specific therapeutic options for the treatment of QoL have been defined: psychotherapy, social counseling, pain therapy, physiotherapy, nutrition counseling, fitness. To provide continuous medical education, quality circles for each therapeutic option have been founded. Physicians receive a list with addresses of all quality circle members.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- breast cancer
- operated in one of two participating certified centers for breast cancer (Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Regensburg; Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Klinik St. Hedwig, Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Regensburg)
- informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- unavailability of recruiting study clinician
- patient misclassified in the operation schedule (no breast neoplasm)
- coordinating practitioner refused trial participation
- no "Nachsorgekalendernummer" available ("Nachsorgekalendernummer": unique number of the diary the patient receives in the hospital for aftercare during breast cancer)
- patient from district outside the defined study region
- age under 18 years
- pregnancy
- patient unable to fill out the QoL questionnaire (physical, psychological, cognitive, language reasons)
- patient refused trial participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tumor Center Regensburglead
- German Cancer Aidcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Tumor Center Regensburg, Institute of Quality Management and Health Services Research of the University of Regensburg
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053, Germany
Related Publications (6)
Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Steinger B, Koller M, Zeman F, Furst A, Gumpp J, Obermaier R, Piso P, Lindberg-Scharf P; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Diagnosing deficits in quality of life and providing tailored therapeutic options: Results of a randomised trial in 220 patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;130:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
PMID: 32179445BACKGROUNDKlinkhammer-Schalke M, Lindberg P, Koller M, Wyatt JC, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W, Steinger B. Direct improvement of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients using a tailored pathway with quality of life diagnosis and therapy (DIQOL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Oct 14;16:460. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0972-y.
PMID: 26467994BACKGROUNDKlinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Steinger B, Ehret C, Ernst B, Wyatt JC, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):826-38. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.4. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
PMID: 22315052BACKGROUNDKlinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Ehret C, Steinger B, Ernst B, Wyatt JC, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Implementing a system of quality-of-life diagnosis and therapy for breast cancer patients: results of an exploratory trial as a prerequisite for a subsequent RCT. Br J Cancer. 2008 Aug 5;99(3):415-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604505.
PMID: 18665187BACKGROUNDKlinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Wyatt JC, Steinger B, Ehret C, Ernst B, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W. Quality of life diagnosis and therapy as complex intervention for improvement of health in breast cancer patients: delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements (modeling). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;393(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0210-5. Epub 2007 Jul 28.
PMID: 17661076BACKGROUNDLindberg-Scharf P, Steinger B, Koller M, Hofstadter A, Ortmann O, Kurz J, Sasse J, Klinkhammer-Schalke M. Long-term improvement of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: supporting patient-physician communication by an electronic tool for inpatient and outpatient care. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7865-7875. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06270-1. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
PMID: 34176020DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, MD, Prof.
Tumor Center Regensburg
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patricia Lindberg-Scharf, PhD
Tumor Center Regensburg
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brunhilde Steinger, MD
Tumor Center Regensburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of the Tumor Center Regensburg
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2020
First Posted
April 6, 2020
Study Start
May 30, 2016
Primary Completion
January 18, 2019
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
November 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 6 months after date of publication until 60 months after date of publication
- Access Criteria
- Data will be made available to other scientists upon request for nonprofit research. The contact address is monika.klinkhammer-schalke@ukr.de. Scientists are required to send their predefined statistical analysis plan. Together with the scientific review board of the Tumor Center Regensburg a decision will be made based on the quality and usefulness of planned statistical analysis. In case of a positive decision the scientist is required to sign a contract for data usage before receiving anonymized IPD.
Anonymized IPD that underlie the results in a publication are planned to be made available upon request of scientists.