NCT04334096

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is the long-term implementation of a system with quality of life diagnosis and tailored therapeutic options in order to improve quality of life of patients with breast cancer during follow-up.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable quality-of-life

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable quality-of-life

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2016

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 18, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 5, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 4, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

quality of lifebreast cancercomplex interventionlong-term implementationhealth services research

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • proportion of patients with a need for QoL therapy

    a need for QoL therapy is defined as a score \<50 points in at least one of eleven QoL dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 (scales: global quality of life, physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social functioning, pain, fatigue, financial situation, body image, arm symptoms); scores in each dimension are uniformly transformed to dimensions ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the negative (low functioning, high symptom burden) and 100 the positive end (high functioning, low symptom burden) of the continuum.

    6 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • proportions of patients with a need for QoL therapy in each dimension of the QoL profile

    3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer

  • patient evaluation

    6 and 24 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer

  • physician evaluation

    6 and 24 months after the date of surgery for breast cancer

Study Arms (1)

QoL diagnosis and therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

The first quality of life (QoL) measurement is conducted in the hospital after surgery via a digital questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) on a tablet computer. Further QoL measures are accomplished via paper-pencil in the practice of the patient's physician during aftercare (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months after surgery). Paper questionnaires are transferred by fax to a local server, automatically processed, digitized and stored in a database, and transferred back to the physician's practice (email or fax depending on preference) in form of a QoL profile. The immediate response enables patient and physician to discuss the QoL profile right away. Specific therapeutic options for the treatment of QoL have been defined: psychotherapy, social counseling, pain therapy, physiotherapy, nutrition counseling, fitness. To provide continuous medical education, quality circles for each therapeutic option have been founded. Physicians receive a list with addresses of all quality circle members.

Behavioral: quality of life pathway

Interventions

The first quality of life (QoL) measurement is conducted in the hospital after surgery via a digital questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) on a tablet computer. Further QoL measures are accomplished via paper-pencil in the practice of the patient's physician during aftercare (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months after surgery). Paper questionnaires are transferred by fax to a local server, automatically processed, digitized and stored in a database, and transferred back to the physician's practice (email or fax depending on preference) in form of a QoL profile. The immediate response enables patient and physician to discuss the QoL profile right away. Specific therapeutic options for the treatment of QoL have been defined: psychotherapy, social counseling, pain therapy, physiotherapy, nutrition counseling, fitness. To provide continuous medical education, quality circles for each therapeutic option have been founded. Physicians receive a list with addresses of all quality circle members.

Also known as: quality of life diagnosis and therapy; quality of life pathway
QoL diagnosis and therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • breast cancer
  • operated in one of two participating certified centers for breast cancer (Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Regensburg; Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Klinik St. Hedwig, Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Regensburg)
  • informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • unavailability of recruiting study clinician
  • patient misclassified in the operation schedule (no breast neoplasm)
  • coordinating practitioner refused trial participation
  • no "Nachsorgekalendernummer" available ("Nachsorgekalendernummer": unique number of the diary the patient receives in the hospital for aftercare during breast cancer)
  • patient from district outside the defined study region
  • age under 18 years
  • pregnancy
  • patient unable to fill out the QoL questionnaire (physical, psychological, cognitive, language reasons)
  • patient refused trial participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tumor Center Regensburg, Institute of Quality Management and Health Services Research of the University of Regensburg

Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053, Germany

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Steinger B, Koller M, Zeman F, Furst A, Gumpp J, Obermaier R, Piso P, Lindberg-Scharf P; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Diagnosing deficits in quality of life and providing tailored therapeutic options: Results of a randomised trial in 220 patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;130:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

    PMID: 32179445BACKGROUND
  • Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Lindberg P, Koller M, Wyatt JC, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W, Steinger B. Direct improvement of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients using a tailored pathway with quality of life diagnosis and therapy (DIQOL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Oct 14;16:460. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0972-y.

    PMID: 26467994BACKGROUND
  • Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Steinger B, Ehret C, Ernst B, Wyatt JC, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):826-38. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.4. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

    PMID: 22315052BACKGROUND
  • Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Ehret C, Steinger B, Ernst B, Wyatt JC, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Implementing a system of quality-of-life diagnosis and therapy for breast cancer patients: results of an exploratory trial as a prerequisite for a subsequent RCT. Br J Cancer. 2008 Aug 5;99(3):415-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604505.

    PMID: 18665187BACKGROUND
  • Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Wyatt JC, Steinger B, Ehret C, Ernst B, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W. Quality of life diagnosis and therapy as complex intervention for improvement of health in breast cancer patients: delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements (modeling). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;393(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0210-5. Epub 2007 Jul 28.

    PMID: 17661076BACKGROUND
  • Lindberg-Scharf P, Steinger B, Koller M, Hofstadter A, Ortmann O, Kurz J, Sasse J, Klinkhammer-Schalke M. Long-term improvement of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: supporting patient-physician communication by an electronic tool for inpatient and outpatient care. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7865-7875. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06270-1. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, MD, Prof.

    Tumor Center Regensburg

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Patricia Lindberg-Scharf, PhD

    Tumor Center Regensburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Brunhilde Steinger, MD

    Tumor Center Regensburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of the Tumor Center Regensburg

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2020

First Posted

April 6, 2020

Study Start

May 30, 2016

Primary Completion

January 18, 2019

Study Completion

September 30, 2020

Last Updated

November 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymized IPD that underlie the results in a publication are planned to be made available upon request of scientists.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
6 months after date of publication until 60 months after date of publication
Access Criteria
Data will be made available to other scientists upon request for nonprofit research. The contact address is monika.klinkhammer-schalke@ukr.de. Scientists are required to send their predefined statistical analysis plan. Together with the scientific review board of the Tumor Center Regensburg a decision will be made based on the quality and usefulness of planned statistical analysis. In case of a positive decision the scientist is required to sign a contract for data usage before receiving anonymized IPD.

Locations