Does Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Improve Operating Conditions During Total Hip Replacements?
1 other identifier
interventional
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During many surgeries, increased muscle tension makes it harder for the surgeon to expose the site of surgery and work within the incision. Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) drugs such as Vecuronium bind to neurotransmitter (acetyl choline) receptors at the neuromuscular junction, blocking their action and producing muscle relaxation. This muscle relaxation allows easier retraction of muscle tissues and manipulation of structures in the wound. Improved surgical conditions are likely to result in improved patient outcomes. While increased depths of NMB have been shown to optimize surgical conditions during intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal procedures, the impact of NMB depth has not been reported for orthopedic surgeries.1 To address this, we propose to study the effect of NMB depth on surgical conditions during total hip replacement (THR).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 10, 2019
CompletedSeptember 18, 2019
September 1, 2019
12 months
July 11, 2017
August 19, 2019
September 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical Conditions
The surgeon graded the overall surgical conditions on a 5 point Likert scale, that was taken into account along with requests for additional muscle relaxation. The Likert scale went from 1 (extremely poor conditions: muscles resistant to retraction and obscure view, implant difficult to insert into socket, requires assist) to 5 (optimal conditions: muscles relaxed, excellent view, implant easy to insert).
Through study completion, an average of 24 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Surgery
Through study completion, an average of 24 hours for each patient and up to one year for the whole study.
Study Arms (2)
Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade (NMB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntubating dose of Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.0125 to 0.05 mg/kg as needed to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 train-of-four (TOF) contractions. Redosing in this manner is a current clinical practice.
Deep NMB
ACTIVE COMPARATORDeep NMB: Intubating dose of Vecuronium 0.2 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg to achieve and maintain zero twitches in the TOF, and post tetanic count (PTC) of 1 to 2 contractions. This level of blockade is new to the practice since approval of the drug for use at Maine Medical Center (MMC) but is in common use since the advent of Sugammadex.
Interventions
Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 TOF contractions.
Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and 0 TOF/PTC 1-2.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical status 1-3
- age 50-75
- English speaking
- able to provide informed consent
- BMI equal to less than 30
- non-emergent THR by anterolateral minimally invasive non-cemented total hip arthroplasty
You may not qualify if:
- Revision surgery
- Bilateral THR
- ASA 4+
- age less than 50 or greater than 75
- BMI greater than 30
- unable to provide informed consent
- women taking oral contraceptives (Sugammadex used for reversal interferes with their efficacy
- contraindications to general inhalation anesthesia (such as malignant hyperthermia)
- contraindications to NMB (known allergy to NMB)
- chronic kidney disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Craig Currylead
- MaineHealthcollaborator
- Spectrum Medical Group Anesthesiologycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102, United States
Related Publications (5)
Basad E, Ishaque B, Sturz H, Jerosch J. The anterolateral minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, pitfalls, and way out. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009 Oct;40(4):473-8, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.05.001.
PMID: 19773052BACKGROUNDBrueckmann B, Sasaki N, Grobara P, Li MK, Woo T, de Bie J, Maktabi M, Lee J, Kwo J, Pino R, Sabouri AS, McGovern F, Staehr-Rye AK, Eikermann M. Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):743-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev104. Epub 2015 May 2.
PMID: 25935840BACKGROUNDMadsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Gatke MR, Claudius C. Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Jan;59(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/aas.12419. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
PMID: 25328055BACKGROUNDPaton F, Paulden M, Chambers D, Heirs M, Duffy S, Hunter JM, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for routine reversal of neuromuscular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):558-67. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq269. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
PMID: 20935005BACKGROUNDChambers D, Paulden M, Paton F, Heirs M, Duffy S, Craig D, Hunter J, Wilson J, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex for the reversal of muscle relaxation in general anaesthesia: a systematic review and economic assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(39):1-211. doi: 10.3310/hta14390.
PMID: 20688009BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Research Coordinator
- Organization
- Maine Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig Curry, MD
Maine Medical Center/Spectrum Medical Group
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The anesthesiologist will NOT be blinded, but the orthopedic surgeon performing the hip replacement surgery will be.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2017
First Posted
July 17, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 30, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 18, 2019
Results First Posted
September 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share