Motor System Activation With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Physical Exercise to Reduce Pain in Elderly
Activating Motor System to Relieve Pain in Elderly: What is the Role of Physical Exercise and Transcranial Stimulation
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Physical exercises are known to reduce chronic pain in elderly individuals by activating the motor system. However, it seems that exercises are not effective for everyone. The investigators believe that elderly individuals with altered corticospinal tract will be those in whom the exercise alone are not sufficient to relieve pain. For those patients, adding an exogenous stimulation of the motor system such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) would facilitate the corticospinal tract, and consequently, would help exercises to relieve chronic pain. The investigators hypothesize that combining tDCS with the exercises will be more effective than exercises alone, but only in individuals who initially show low corticospinal projections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Dec 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedMarch 27, 2023
March 1, 2023
2.8 years
January 23, 2020
March 24, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in Pain intensity
Pain intensity will be assessed with a pain logbook containing a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10
Before intervention (T1), First week of intervention (T2), Week 4 (T3), Week 8 (T4), Follow-up 1 week after intervention (T5), Follow-up 1 month after intervention (T6)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Corticospinal excitability (TMS)
Before intervention, Follow-up 1 week after, Follow-up 1 month after
Corticospinal excitability (dMRI)
Before intervention, Follow-up 1 week after, Follow-up 1 month after
Functional connectivity
Before intervention, Follow-up 1 week after intervention, Follow-up 1 month after intervention
McGill pain questionnaire
Before intervention, Follow-up 1 week after intervention, Follow-up 1 month after intervention
Brief pain inventory
Before intervention, Follow-up 1 week after intervention, Follow-up 1 month after intervention
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Exercise + real tDCS
EXPERIMENTALIntervention will last 8 weeks where participants will be trained at a rate of 3 workouts per week. For the first week, participants will receive 5 daily sessions of anodal tDCS (2 mA, 20 min).
Exercise + Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORIntervention will last 8 weeks where participants will be trained at a rate of 3 workouts per week. For the first week, participants will receive 5 daily sessions of sham tDCS.
Interventions
Aerobic exercise and physical training combined with sham tDCS
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To have musculoskeletal chronic pain
- Not to change medication and life habits during the study
You may not qualify if:
- People physically active before the study (more then 150 min of moderate to vigorous exercise par week)
- To have an uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
- To have orthopedic limitation or contraindication to physical exercise
- To have contraindication to tDCS
- To have contraindication to TMS
- To have contraindication to MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Research Centre on Aging
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 4C4, Canada
Grace Village
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1M 0C6, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillaume Léonard, pht, PhD.
Université de Sherbrooke
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2020
First Posted
April 3, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share