NCT04332419

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) to positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) to help determine any added advantage of one over the other in relation to a tumor which might assist in further management plans.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 3, 2020

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 21, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 21, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 5, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 22, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

March 31, 2020

Results QC Date

July 30, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 1, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Reproducibility Coefficient (RDC) Between the Two Imaging Modalities in Liver Tumor Tissues

    RDC between the two imaging modalities for post-Y-90 Radioembolization (RE) absorbed doses (Gy) in the liver tumor tissues The RDC is the minimum difference between the two measurements that can be considered a true difference, with 95% confidence.

    Post-op day 0, 1 hour apart

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • RDC Between the Two Imaging Modalities in Background Liver Tissues

    Post-op day 0, 1 hour apart

Study Arms (1)

PET/CT & PET/MR

EXPERIMENTAL

One-time PET/MR imaging in addition to the standard PET/CT imaging, both performed on the same day of the treatment procedure (Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Y-90 RE). Participants will be randomized to receive either of the imaging modalities first, based on the availability of the imaging device, and less than 1 hour apart.

Device: PET/CTDevice: PET/MRRadiation: SIRT with Y-90

Interventions

PET/CTDEVICE

Standard Imaging

PET/CT & PET/MR
PET/MRDEVICE

Additional Imaging

PET/CT & PET/MR

SIRT with Y-90 for palliative treatment of the liver malignancy.

PET/CT & PET/MR

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient has a liver malignancy and is scheduled for SIRT with Y-90; AND
  • The patient is an adult, self-competent, and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient loses competence, has a condition that questions their ability to provide informed consent independently (e.g. cannot communicate in English), or withdraws consent to participate within any time in the study period; OR
  • The patient is not eligible to undergo MRI due to the presence of metal devices or implants in their body; OR
  • Both imaging modalities cannot take place within 6 hours after Y-90 RE; OR
  • Both imaging modalities cannot take place within 1 hour apart from each other

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44122, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySirtuinsYttrium-90

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Positron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-ComputedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedMultimodal ImagingRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayRadionuclide ImagingTomographyDiagnostic Techniques, RadioisotopeGroup III Histone DeacetylasesHistone DeacetylasesAmidohydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesADP Ribose TransferasesPentosyltransferasesGlycosyltransferasesTransferasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Ram Gurajala, MD
Organization
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study Officials

  • Ram Gurajala, MD

    Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2020

First Posted

April 2, 2020

Study Start

March 3, 2020

Primary Completion

September 21, 2020

Study Completion

September 21, 2020

Last Updated

June 22, 2022

Results First Posted

October 5, 2021

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Team will be sharing study results but not IPD because of HIPAA regulations

Locations