NCT04316871

Brief Summary

This a clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of three different doses of morphine, namely 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg, via the epidural route regarding reducing pain in elderly patients after a cancer surgery in the lower abdomen

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 19, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 20, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2021

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 5, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

March 19, 2020

Results QC Date

July 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Injections, EpiduralMorphine Sulfate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.

    The mean total PCA morphine consumption (mg) in the first 72 hr. postoperatively

    72 hours

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Visual Analog Scale

    72 hours

  • Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale

    Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale at 2 hours postoperative

  • Nausea Score

    72 hours

  • Vomiting Score

    72 hours

  • Pruritus Score

    72 hours

Study Arms (4)

Group D

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

A total volume of 10 mL injection 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.

Drug: Normal saline

Group A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 1.5 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.

Drug: 1.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate

Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 3 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.

Drug: 3 mg of Morphine Sulfate

Group C

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A total volume of 10 mL injection: 5 mL of bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.125% with 4 mg of preservative-free morphine diluted in 5 mL preservative-free normal saline by the hospital pharmacist.

Drug: 4.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate

Interventions

1.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.

Also known as: A
Group A

Normal saline will be given epidurally.

Also known as: D
Group D

3 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.

Also known as: B
Group B

4.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.

Also known as: C
Group C

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Men and women aged ≥ 60 years, who are planned to undergo lower abdominal cancer surgery.
  • ASA I and II classifications. 2. Surgeries via infra-umbilical abdominal incision is considered eligible.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients who are morbidly obese (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2).
  • Those with contraindications to neuraxial analgesia. 4- psychiatric illness that would interfere with the perception and the assessment of pain.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assuit University

Asyut, 71515, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • McKeown JL. Pain Management Issues for the Geriatric Surgical Patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Sep;33(3):563-76. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

    PMID: 26315638BACKGROUND
  • Palmer CM, Nogami WM, Van Maren G, Alves DM. Postcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study. Anesth Analg. 2000 Apr;90(4):887-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200004000-00021.

    PMID: 10735794BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

MorphineSaline SolutionFumigant 93

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Morphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Limitations and Caveats

This study is limited by focusing on lower abdominal cancer surgeries only; also, it is a single center study. Therefore, the generalizability of our results is limited. Future large studies on different types of surgeries are needed. Due to the vulnerability of older adults, we assessed the balancing dose of epidural morphine versus age only. The relation between the dose of epidural morphine and common comorbidities in this age group should be investigated.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Muhammad Shawqi
Organization
Assiut University

Study Officials

  • Diab Hetta, MD

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This randomized, double blinded, clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt. The maximum total PCA morphine consumption was 12 ± 16 mg while in healthy controls was 70± 35 mg. We aim to enroll at least 60-80 participants considering the following assumptions: * Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference of the difference of PCA morphine consumption between the four groups. * Main outcome variable is total PCA morphine consumption after lower abdominal cancer surgery in elderly patients receiving three different doses of epidural morphine in comparison with its consumption in healthy controls not receiving epidural morphine. * Effect size = 0.75, Alpha = 0.05, Power = 0.80 * Allocation ratio N4/N3/N2/N1 = 1/1/1/1. * 22 patients should be enrolled in each group to account for dropouts.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesia resident at South Egypt Cancer Institute

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2020

First Posted

March 20, 2020

Study Start

March 20, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2020

Study Completion

June 30, 2021

Last Updated

March 5, 2025

Results First Posted

March 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.
Access Criteria
The data will not be publicly available due to containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.

Locations