NCT04312321

Brief Summary

This study investigates safety and efficacy of the use of audiovisual consultations of emergency medical service (EMS) doctor by paramedics for low urgency events in areas covered with paramedic crews only from emergency medical service stations with distant access to hospital.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 17, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

January 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Pre-hospital careAudiovisual consultationNon-transportLow urgency

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Non-transport of low urgency EMS case to hospital

    Based on Karlovy Vary EMS audit data, there is 10% of low urgency cases treated and left on site by paramedics so far. So the primary outcome is to evaluate the rate of non-transports in common daily routine, when the doctor provides phone call consultation on request of paramedics (based on Karlovy Vary EMS protocol) to mandatory phone call consultation and audiovisual consultation with a EMS doctor. Therefore, the primary objective is to evaluate potential benefit audiovisual consultation with EMS doctor on the rate of patients left at home after treatment on site by paramedics.

    until 200 cases per group are collected, estimated time 6-8 weeks from the beginning of the study

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The rate of repeated trips within 48 hours after the patient had been treated at home.

    until 200 cases per group are collected, estimated time 6-8 weeks from the beginning of the study

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Qualitative analysis of subjective perception of phone call and audivisual consultation.

    until 200 cases per group are collected, estimated time 6-8 weeks from the beginning of the study

Study Arms (3)

CONTROL

NO INTERVENTION

CONTROL group: low urgency cases with routine operation of paramedic crew with optional consultation with a doctor over the phone.

PHONE

EXPERIMENTAL

In the PHONE group, there will be a mandatory consultation of a doctor over the phone in all low urgency cases.

Device: Mandatory phone call consultation

VIDEO

EXPERIMENTAL

In the VIDEO group, there will be a mandatory consultation of a doctor over the audiovisual consultation in low urgency cases

Device: Mandatory audiovisual consultation

Interventions

Use of audio consultation (EMS crew smartphones, doctor smarphone) Smartphone (Xiaomi Redmi Note) and bluetooth handsfree headset (Jabra Talk)

Also known as: mandatory phone consultation (via Czech mobile network provider O2 Czech, GSM), mandatory telephone consultation (via Czech mobile network provider O2 Czech, GSM)
PHONE

Smartphone (Xiaomi Redmi Note) and bluetooth handsfree headset (Jabra Talk) with installed Android application (VSee messenger, USA, HIPAA compliant software) for paramedic crews; personal computer (Windows 10) with desktop version of application VSee messenger for Windows and eqipped with webcamera (Logitech C922 PRO) and headset (Jabra Evolve 20) for consulting doctor.

Also known as: Mandatory video conference consultation
VIDEO

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • the call is evaluated as low urgency event (by criteria of Karlovy Vary EMS call-taker manual; the event is dedicated for paramedic crew only, without dispatchig doctor on site),
  • the case is determined for and will be served by one of 11 for study dedicated of total 19 paramedic crews in Karlovy Vary EMS,
  • dedicated doctor of Karlovy Vary EMS will be available for consultation during his shift.

You may not qualify if:

  • need for escalation of the care: paramedics' requirement for the doctor to arrive at the scene of intervention,
  • consulting doctor is not available for the study at the moment of randomisation,
  • consultation with other than trained and for study dedicated doctors,
  • patient - crew language barrier,
  • study refusal by the patient or legal representative, or refusal of audiovisual consultation,
  • technical, logistic or other (agressive patient, patient detained by police) problems evaluated by paramedic crew (not to conduct a study in PHONE and especially VIDEO group)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zdravotnická záchranná služba Karlovarského kraje, p.o.

Karlovy Vary, Karlovarský kraj, 360 06, Czechia

Location

Study Officials

  • Jiri Smetana, MD

    Zdravotnická záchranná služba Karlovarskeho kraje, PO

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Low urgency emergency calls are randomised by call-taker of dispatching center to 3 groups: routine prehospital emergency care without optional phone call consultation (1), with mandatory phone call consultation with base physician (2), with mandatory audivisual consultation with base physician (3). Power analysis. Based on available data prior to the initiation of the study, 10% of patients after low acuity calls were treated on site. The hypothesis that the video consult would lead to doubling this percentage will be investigated. In order to have 80% probability to confirm this at p \< 0.05, we would need 200 subjects per group. Planned interim analysis will be after 4 weeks of study (aprox. after 600 eligible cases) .
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2020

First Posted

March 18, 2020

Study Start

October 17, 2019

Primary Completion

November 30, 2019

Study Completion

March 15, 2020

Last Updated

March 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations