Audiovisual Consultations in Prehospital Emergency Care: Randomised Controlled Trial
Telemedicine
Audiovisual Consultations by Paramedics With an Emergency Medical Service Physician in Low Urgency Events: Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study investigates safety and efficacy of the use of audiovisual consultations of emergency medical service (EMS) doctor by paramedics for low urgency events in areas covered with paramedic crews only from emergency medical service stations with distant access to hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2020
CompletedMarch 20, 2020
March 1, 2020
1 month
January 29, 2020
March 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Non-transport of low urgency EMS case to hospital
Based on Karlovy Vary EMS audit data, there is 10% of low urgency cases treated and left on site by paramedics so far. So the primary outcome is to evaluate the rate of non-transports in common daily routine, when the doctor provides phone call consultation on request of paramedics (based on Karlovy Vary EMS protocol) to mandatory phone call consultation and audiovisual consultation with a EMS doctor. Therefore, the primary objective is to evaluate potential benefit audiovisual consultation with EMS doctor on the rate of patients left at home after treatment on site by paramedics.
until 200 cases per group are collected, estimated time 6-8 weeks from the beginning of the study
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The rate of repeated trips within 48 hours after the patient had been treated at home.
until 200 cases per group are collected, estimated time 6-8 weeks from the beginning of the study
Other Outcomes (1)
Qualitative analysis of subjective perception of phone call and audivisual consultation.
until 200 cases per group are collected, estimated time 6-8 weeks from the beginning of the study
Study Arms (3)
CONTROL
NO INTERVENTIONCONTROL group: low urgency cases with routine operation of paramedic crew with optional consultation with a doctor over the phone.
PHONE
EXPERIMENTALIn the PHONE group, there will be a mandatory consultation of a doctor over the phone in all low urgency cases.
VIDEO
EXPERIMENTALIn the VIDEO group, there will be a mandatory consultation of a doctor over the audiovisual consultation in low urgency cases
Interventions
Use of audio consultation (EMS crew smartphones, doctor smarphone) Smartphone (Xiaomi Redmi Note) and bluetooth handsfree headset (Jabra Talk)
Smartphone (Xiaomi Redmi Note) and bluetooth handsfree headset (Jabra Talk) with installed Android application (VSee messenger, USA, HIPAA compliant software) for paramedic crews; personal computer (Windows 10) with desktop version of application VSee messenger for Windows and eqipped with webcamera (Logitech C922 PRO) and headset (Jabra Evolve 20) for consulting doctor.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the call is evaluated as low urgency event (by criteria of Karlovy Vary EMS call-taker manual; the event is dedicated for paramedic crew only, without dispatchig doctor on site),
- the case is determined for and will be served by one of 11 for study dedicated of total 19 paramedic crews in Karlovy Vary EMS,
- dedicated doctor of Karlovy Vary EMS will be available for consultation during his shift.
You may not qualify if:
- need for escalation of the care: paramedics' requirement for the doctor to arrive at the scene of intervention,
- consulting doctor is not available for the study at the moment of randomisation,
- consultation with other than trained and for study dedicated doctors,
- patient - crew language barrier,
- study refusal by the patient or legal representative, or refusal of audiovisual consultation,
- technical, logistic or other (agressive patient, patient detained by police) problems evaluated by paramedic crew (not to conduct a study in PHONE and especially VIDEO group)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zdravotnická záchranná služba Karlovarského kraje, p.o.
Karlovy Vary, Karlovarský kraj, 360 06, Czechia
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jiri Smetana, MD
Zdravotnická záchranná služba Karlovarskeho kraje, PO
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2020
First Posted
March 18, 2020
Study Start
October 17, 2019
Primary Completion
November 30, 2019
Study Completion
March 15, 2020
Last Updated
March 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03