Optimal Peripheral Nerve Block After Minimally Invasive Colon Surgery
OPMICS
Laparoscopic vs Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colon Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Multicentre Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of the trial is to identify the "most simple non-inferior of three different methods", placebo, laparoscopic assisted transverse abdominal plane block (L-TAP) and ultrasound guided TAP block (US-TAP), using postoperative opioid consumption as a measure of efficacy in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colon surgery in an ERAS setting. Postoperative pain scores and length of stay (LOS) will also be measured. The simplicity of the three methods is ranked as: 1) placebo, 2) L-TAP and 3) US-TAP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2021
Typical duration for phase_4
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2024
CompletedAugust 7, 2025
August 1, 2025
3.1 years
March 9, 2020
August 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total morphine dose equivalents administered.
Intravenously in milligrams.
The first 24 hours from the end of anesthesia.
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Total morphine dose equivalents administered in the operation theater.
Up to 12 hours.
Total morphine dose equivalents administered in the post anesthesia care unit.
The first 24 hours from the end of anesthesia.
Postoperative pain at rest - 8:00-10:00 AM (ante meridiem) Postoperative Day 1.
Postoperative Day 1.
Postoperative pain when coughing - 8:00-10:00 AM Postoperative Day 1
Postoperative Day 1.
Postoperative length of stay.
Up to 30 days.
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Ultrasound-guided TAP
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided TAP with 20 ml ropivacaine 2 mg/ml solution bilaterally and laparoscopic assisted injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally at the beginning of surgery
Laparoscopic assisted TAP
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic assisted TAP with 20 ml ropivacaine 2 mg/ml solution bilaterally and ultrasound-guided injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally at the beginning of surgery
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORLaparoscopic assisted injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally and ultrasound-guided injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally at the beginning of surgery
Interventions
Injection of Ropivacaine
Injection of Saline solution
Lateral ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane block 40 ml ropivacaine 2 mg / ml
Laparoscopic assisted subcostal transverse abdominal plane block 40 ml ropivacaine 2 mg / ml
Lateral ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane block with saline solution
Laparoscopic assisted subcostal transverse abdominal plane block with saline solution
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients planned to receive curative elective minimally invasive colon surgery for colon cancer or adenoma without a planned ostomy. Colon cancer or adenoma is defined by a distance of more than 15 cm from the anal verge to the distal limitation of the tumour or adenoma as measured by rigid sigmoidoscope. The following procedural codes are included:
- Laparoscopic ileocecal resection
- Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
- Other laparoscopic resection of both small and large bowel
- Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon
- Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy
- Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon
- Other laparoscopic colon resection
- Having given informed written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy to local analgesics
- Known liver failure Class C according to the Child-Pugh Score
- Body weight of less than 40 kg
- History of being a chronic pain patient (weekly intake WHO step II or step III or adjuvant step I analgesic)
- Presence of concomitant painful conditions other than low back pain that could confound the subject's trial assessments or self-evaluation of the index pain, e.g., syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia
- Predictably non-compliant due to language barrier or psychiatric disease
- Patients rescheduled for open surgery, before the intervention has been administered
- Patients where the indication for surgery changes before the intervention has been administered
- Patients with known inflammatory bowel disease
- Patients who have previously undergone open major abdominal surgery defined by prior intraabdominal surgery with a midline or upper abdominal incision of more than 8 cm
- Incisional hernia
- Patients with a history of abdominal wall surgery including resection of the external oblique muscles, the internal oblique muscles, the transversus abdominis muscles, the rectus abdominis muscles or their fascial components
- Pregnancy (patients are screened using urine human chorionic gonadotropin upon admission if female and not postmenopausal).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Sydvestjysk Sygehus
Esbjerg, 6700, Denmark
Regionshospitalet Herning
Herning, 7400, Denmark
Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand
Hillerød, 3400, Denmark
Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre
Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
Regionshospitalet Viborg
Viborg, 8800, Denmark
Related Publications (25)
Lund H, Spanager L, Winther ACR, Gierloff M, Sunekaer K, Kleif J, Bertelsen CA. Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a self-adherent mesh: a patient-reported follow-up study. Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2464-2470. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11614-7. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
PMID: 39994048BACKGROUNDSalmonsen CB, Lange KHW, Kleif J, Kroijer R, Bruun L, Mikalonis M, Dalsgaard P, Hesseldal KB, Olsson JEP, Bertelsen CA; OPMICS Study Group. Transversus abdominis plane block in minimally invasive colon surgery: a multicenter three-arm randomized controlled superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 23:rapm-2024-105712. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105712. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 39542642BACKGROUNDHelander EM, Webb MP, Bias M, Whang EE, Kaye AD, Urman RD. A Comparison of Multimodal Analgesic Approaches in Institutional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Colorectal Surgery: Pharmacological Agents. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):903-908. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0338. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
PMID: 28742427BACKGROUNDGrant MC, Yang D, Wu CL, Makary MA, Wick EC. Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Fast Track Surgery Pathways on Healthcare-associated Infections: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):68-79. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001703.
PMID: 28009729BACKGROUNDJohns N, O'Neill S, Ventham NT, Barron F, Brady RR, Daniel T. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):e635-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03104.x.
PMID: 22632762BACKGROUNDNeal JM, Brull R, Chan VW, Grant SA, Horn JL, Liu SS, McCartney CJ, Narouze SN, Perlas A, Salinas FV, Sites BD, Tsui BC. The ASRA evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: Executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2 Suppl):S1-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d22fe0.
PMID: 20216019BACKGROUNDBorglum J, Gogenur I, Bendtsen TF. Abdominal wall blocks in adults. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):638-43. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000378.
PMID: 27429253BACKGROUNDKeller DS, Madhoun N, Ponte-Moreno OI, Ibarra S, Haas EM. Transversus abdominis plane blocks: pilot of feasibility and the learning curve. J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
PMID: 27451874BACKGROUNDKeller DS, Ermlich BO, Schiltz N, Champagne BJ, Reynolds HL Jr, Stein SL, Delaney CP. The effect of transversus abdominis plane blocks on postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Nov;57(11):1290-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000211.
PMID: 25285696BACKGROUNDFavuzza J, Brady K, Delaney CP. Transversus abdominis plane blocks and enhanced recovery pathways: making the 23-h hospital stay a realistic goal after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2481-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2761-y. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
PMID: 23355160BACKGROUNDRafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001 Oct;56(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11576144BACKGROUNDHebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):616-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 18020088BACKGROUNDChetwood A, Agrawal S, Hrouda D, Doyle P. Laparoscopic assisted transversus abdominis plane block: a novel insertion technique during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):317-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06664.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 21401554BACKGROUNDElamin G, Waters PS, Hamid H, O'Keeffe HM, Waldron RM, Duggan M, Khan W, Barry MK, Khan IZ. Efficacy of a Laparoscopically Delivered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Technique during Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
PMID: 25899736BACKGROUNDPark SY, Park JS, Choi GS, Kim HJ, Moon S, Yeo J. Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Laparoscope-Assisted and Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block after Laparoscopic Colorectal Operation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Sep;225(3):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
PMID: 28610880BACKGROUNDZaghiyan KN, Mendelson BJ, Eng MR, Ovsepyan G, Mirocha JM, Fleshner P. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):203-210. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001292.
PMID: 30540660BACKGROUNDStark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
PMID: 23411725BACKGROUNDDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PMID: 15273542BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDDickerson DM, Apfelbaum JL. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Sep;34(7):1111-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14543102. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
PMID: 25028740BACKGROUNDNaidu RK, Richebe P. Probable local anesthetic systemic toxicity in a postpartum patient with acute Fatty liver of pregnancy after a transversus abdominis plane block. A A Case Rep. 2013 Dec 1;1(5):72-4. doi: 10.1097/ACC.0b013e3182973a2f.
PMID: 25612087BACKGROUNDStatzer N, Cummings KC 3rd. Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks. Adv Anesth. 2018 Dec;36(1):163-180. doi: 10.1016/j.aan.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Sep 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 30414636BACKGROUNDChin KJ, McDonnell JG, Carvalho B, Sharkey A, Pawa A, Gadsden J. Essentials of Our Current Understanding: Abdominal Wall Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):133-183. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000545.
PMID: 28085788BACKGROUNDSullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 524.
BACKGROUNDSalmonsen CB, Lange KHW, Kleif J, Bertelsen CA. Optimal peripheral nerve block after minimally invasive colon surgery - a study protocol for a randomised trial. Dan Med J. 2021 Nov 12;68(12):A03210245.
PMID: 34851250DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Claus A Bertelsen, PhD
Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor, consultant surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2020
First Posted
March 17, 2020
Study Start
January 14, 2021
Primary Completion
February 8, 2024
Study Completion
March 31, 2024
Last Updated
August 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- For 15 years after publication
- Access Criteria
- A methodologically sound proposal for meta-analyses
After de-identification, individual participant data will be made available to investigators who provide a methodologically sound proposal for meta-analyses. Proposals should be directed to Claus A Bertelsen (cabertelsen@gmail.com). A Data Processing Agreement according to the EU General Data Protection Regulation has to be signed before data sharing.