NCT04311099

Brief Summary

The purpose of the trial is to identify the "most simple non-inferior of three different methods", placebo, laparoscopic assisted transverse abdominal plane block (L-TAP) and ultrasound guided TAP block (US-TAP), using postoperative opioid consumption as a measure of efficacy in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colon surgery in an ERAS setting. Postoperative pain scores and length of stay (LOS) will also be measured. The simplicity of the three methods is ranked as: 1) placebo, 2) L-TAP and 3) US-TAP.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
360

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 14, 2021

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 8, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

March 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 4, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total morphine dose equivalents administered.

    Intravenously in milligrams.

    The first 24 hours from the end of anesthesia.

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Total morphine dose equivalents administered in the operation theater.

    Up to 12 hours.

  • Total morphine dose equivalents administered in the post anesthesia care unit.

    The first 24 hours from the end of anesthesia.

  • Postoperative pain at rest - 8:00-10:00 AM (ante meridiem) Postoperative Day 1.

    Postoperative Day 1.

  • Postoperative pain when coughing - 8:00-10:00 AM Postoperative Day 1

    Postoperative Day 1.

  • Postoperative length of stay.

    Up to 30 days.

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Ultrasound-guided TAP

EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound-guided TAP with 20 ml ropivacaine 2 mg/ml solution bilaterally and laparoscopic assisted injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally at the beginning of surgery

Drug: Active drugDrug: PlaceboProcedure: Injection of Ropivacaine - Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane blockProcedure: Injection of placebo - Laparoscopic assisted transverse abdominal plane block

Laparoscopic assisted TAP

EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic assisted TAP with 20 ml ropivacaine 2 mg/ml solution bilaterally and ultrasound-guided injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally at the beginning of surgery

Drug: Active drugDrug: PlaceboProcedure: Injection of Ropivacaine - Laparoscopic assisted transverse abdominal plane blockProcedure: Injection of placebo - Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane block

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic assisted injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally and ultrasound-guided injection of 20 ml saline (placebo) bilaterally at the beginning of surgery

Drug: PlaceboProcedure: Injection of placebo - Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane blockProcedure: Injection of placebo - Laparoscopic assisted transverse abdominal plane block

Interventions

Injection of Ropivacaine

Also known as: Ropivacaine
Laparoscopic assisted TAPUltrasound-guided TAP

Injection of Saline solution

Also known as: Saline solution
Laparoscopic assisted TAPPlaceboUltrasound-guided TAP

Lateral ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane block 40 ml ropivacaine 2 mg / ml

Ultrasound-guided TAP

Laparoscopic assisted subcostal transverse abdominal plane block 40 ml ropivacaine 2 mg / ml

Laparoscopic assisted TAP

Lateral ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane block with saline solution

Laparoscopic assisted TAPPlacebo

Laparoscopic assisted subcostal transverse abdominal plane block with saline solution

PlaceboUltrasound-guided TAP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients planned to receive curative elective minimally invasive colon surgery for colon cancer or adenoma without a planned ostomy. Colon cancer or adenoma is defined by a distance of more than 15 cm from the anal verge to the distal limitation of the tumour or adenoma as measured by rigid sigmoidoscope. The following procedural codes are included:
  • Laparoscopic ileocecal resection
  • Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
  • Other laparoscopic resection of both small and large bowel
  • Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon
  • Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy
  • Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon
  • Other laparoscopic colon resection
  • Having given informed written consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergy to local analgesics
  • Known liver failure Class C according to the Child-Pugh Score
  • Body weight of less than 40 kg
  • History of being a chronic pain patient (weekly intake WHO step II or step III or adjuvant step I analgesic)
  • Presence of concomitant painful conditions other than low back pain that could confound the subject's trial assessments or self-evaluation of the index pain, e.g., syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia
  • Predictably non-compliant due to language barrier or psychiatric disease
  • Patients rescheduled for open surgery, before the intervention has been administered
  • Patients where the indication for surgery changes before the intervention has been administered
  • Patients with known inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patients who have previously undergone open major abdominal surgery defined by prior intraabdominal surgery with a midline or upper abdominal incision of more than 8 cm
  • Incisional hernia
  • Patients with a history of abdominal wall surgery including resection of the external oblique muscles, the internal oblique muscles, the transversus abdominis muscles, the rectus abdominis muscles or their fascial components
  • Pregnancy (patients are screened using urine human chorionic gonadotropin upon admission if female and not postmenopausal).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Sydvestjysk Sygehus

Esbjerg, 6700, Denmark

Location

Regionshospitalet Herning

Herning, 7400, Denmark

Location

Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand

Hillerød, 3400, Denmark

Location

Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre

Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark

Location

Regionshospitalet Viborg

Viborg, 8800, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (25)

  • Lund H, Spanager L, Winther ACR, Gierloff M, Sunekaer K, Kleif J, Bertelsen CA. Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a self-adherent mesh: a patient-reported follow-up study. Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2464-2470. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11614-7. Epub 2025 Feb 24.

    PMID: 39994048BACKGROUND
  • Salmonsen CB, Lange KHW, Kleif J, Kroijer R, Bruun L, Mikalonis M, Dalsgaard P, Hesseldal KB, Olsson JEP, Bertelsen CA; OPMICS Study Group. Transversus abdominis plane block in minimally invasive colon surgery: a multicenter three-arm randomized controlled superiority and non-inferiority clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 23:rapm-2024-105712. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105712. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 39542642BACKGROUND
  • Helander EM, Webb MP, Bias M, Whang EE, Kaye AD, Urman RD. A Comparison of Multimodal Analgesic Approaches in Institutional Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Colorectal Surgery: Pharmacological Agents. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):903-908. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0338. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

    PMID: 28742427BACKGROUND
  • Grant MC, Yang D, Wu CL, Makary MA, Wick EC. Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Fast Track Surgery Pathways on Healthcare-associated Infections: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):68-79. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001703.

    PMID: 28009729BACKGROUND
  • Johns N, O'Neill S, Ventham NT, Barron F, Brady RR, Daniel T. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):e635-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03104.x.

    PMID: 22632762BACKGROUND
  • Neal JM, Brull R, Chan VW, Grant SA, Horn JL, Liu SS, McCartney CJ, Narouze SN, Perlas A, Salinas FV, Sites BD, Tsui BC. The ASRA evidence-based medicine assessment of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and pain medicine: Executive summary. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2 Suppl):S1-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181d22fe0.

    PMID: 20216019BACKGROUND
  • Borglum J, Gogenur I, Bendtsen TF. Abdominal wall blocks in adults. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):638-43. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000378.

    PMID: 27429253BACKGROUND
  • Keller DS, Madhoun N, Ponte-Moreno OI, Ibarra S, Haas EM. Transversus abdominis plane blocks: pilot of feasibility and the learning curve. J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

    PMID: 27451874BACKGROUND
  • Keller DS, Ermlich BO, Schiltz N, Champagne BJ, Reynolds HL Jr, Stein SL, Delaney CP. The effect of transversus abdominis plane blocks on postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Nov;57(11):1290-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000211.

    PMID: 25285696BACKGROUND
  • Favuzza J, Brady K, Delaney CP. Transversus abdominis plane blocks and enhanced recovery pathways: making the 23-h hospital stay a realistic goal after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2481-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2761-y. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

    PMID: 23355160BACKGROUND
  • Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001 Oct;56(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11576144BACKGROUND
  • Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):616-7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18020088BACKGROUND
  • Chetwood A, Agrawal S, Hrouda D, Doyle P. Laparoscopic assisted transversus abdominis plane block: a novel insertion technique during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):317-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06664.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21401554BACKGROUND
  • Elamin G, Waters PS, Hamid H, O'Keeffe HM, Waldron RM, Duggan M, Khan W, Barry MK, Khan IZ. Efficacy of a Laparoscopically Delivered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Technique during Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

    PMID: 25899736BACKGROUND
  • Park SY, Park JS, Choi GS, Kim HJ, Moon S, Yeo J. Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Laparoscope-Assisted and Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block after Laparoscopic Colorectal Operation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Sep;225(3):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Jun 10.

    PMID: 28610880BACKGROUND
  • Zaghiyan KN, Mendelson BJ, Eng MR, Ovsepyan G, Mirocha JM, Fleshner P. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):203-210. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001292.

    PMID: 30540660BACKGROUND
  • Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.

    PMID: 23411725BACKGROUND
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
  • Dickerson DM, Apfelbaum JL. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Sep;34(7):1111-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14543102. Epub 2014 Jul 15.

    PMID: 25028740BACKGROUND
  • Naidu RK, Richebe P. Probable local anesthetic systemic toxicity in a postpartum patient with acute Fatty liver of pregnancy after a transversus abdominis plane block. A A Case Rep. 2013 Dec 1;1(5):72-4. doi: 10.1097/ACC.0b013e3182973a2f.

    PMID: 25612087BACKGROUND
  • Statzer N, Cummings KC 3rd. Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks. Adv Anesth. 2018 Dec;36(1):163-180. doi: 10.1016/j.aan.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Sep 27. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30414636BACKGROUND
  • Chin KJ, McDonnell JG, Carvalho B, Sharkey A, Pawa A, Gadsden J. Essentials of Our Current Understanding: Abdominal Wall Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):133-183. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000545.

    PMID: 28085788BACKGROUND
  • Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 524.

    BACKGROUND
  • Salmonsen CB, Lange KHW, Kleif J, Bertelsen CA. Optimal peripheral nerve block after minimally invasive colon surgery - a study protocol for a randomised trial. Dan Med J. 2021 Nov 12;68(12):A03210245.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeAbdominal PainAgnosiaColonic Neoplasms

Interventions

Bulk DrugsRopivacaineSaline Solution

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, DigestivePerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesColorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pharmaceutical PreparationsAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutions

Study Officials

  • Claus A Bertelsen, PhD

    Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor, consultant surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2020

First Posted

March 17, 2020

Study Start

January 14, 2021

Primary Completion

February 8, 2024

Study Completion

March 31, 2024

Last Updated

August 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

After de-identification, individual participant data will be made available to investigators who provide a methodologically sound proposal for meta-analyses. Proposals should be directed to Claus A Bertelsen (cabertelsen@gmail.com). A Data Processing Agreement according to the EU General Data Protection Regulation has to be signed before data sharing.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
For 15 years after publication
Access Criteria
A methodologically sound proposal for meta-analyses

Locations