NCT04309929

Brief Summary

This study aims to describe the pain-relieving effect obtained with the current post-surgery pain control methods used in breast surgery by measuring the painful sensation and the consumption of opioids in the first 24 post-surgery hours. It also aims to describe the appearance of any complications such as post-surgery nausea and vomiting. Current anesthesia involves the combined use of intravenous painkillers and anti-inflammatory drugs such as acetaminophen, ketorolac, tramadol or morphine (the latter via PCA system = patient-controlled analgesia) or for local administration at the surgical site level ( local anesthetics). It is also proposed to describe the intensity and interference of pain in daily activities

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 12, 2016

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

CancerBreastMastectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of the change of level of anesthesia

    Describing the level of analgesia obtained in the first 24 hours post-operative in patients undergoing simple mastectomy, mastectomy with immediate reconstruction with expander or retropectoral prosthesis, mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy and radical mastectomy modified with the anesthesiological protocols used routinariamentally. Analgesia will be evaluated every 6 hours and for the first 24 post-operative hours (at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 hours from the end of the surgical intervention) through the NRS (Numerical Rating Scale). The Numerical Rating Scale is a pain sensation rating scale at points where the patient chooses a value ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). From 1 to 3 it is considered mild pain, from 4-7 moderate, from 8-10 severe.

    Up to 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Describing the total amount of morphine used in the first 24 post-operative hours.

    24 hours after surgery

  • Describing the incidence of PONV (Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting).

    24 hours after surgery

  • Describing of change in severity of PONV (Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting).

    24 hours after surgery

  • Description of the change of the intensity of pain on daily activities reported by patients undergoing breast surgery.

    3 months after surgery

  • Description of the change of the interference of pain on daily activities reported by patients undergoing breast surgery.

    3 months after surgery

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Women with breast cancer

Female patients (age\> 18yrs) in ASA class \<4; candidate for a planned surgery for simple mastectomy, simple mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy, modified radical mastectomy (unilateral or bilateral)

Drug: Analgesics

Interventions

All patients will undergo the anesthesiological and surgical treatment provided for the patient's clinical conditions and in no case will the patients undergo a change in the normal diagnostic-therapeutic path due to participation in this study.

Women with breast cancer

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All patients who in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria have given their consent to the processing of personal data will be considered for analysis. All patients will undergo the anesthesiological and surgical treatment foreseen for the patient's clinical condition and in no case will the patients undergo a modification of the normal diagnostic-therapeutic path due to participation in this study.

You may qualify if:

  • Female gender
  • Age\> 18 years;
  • Patients in ASA class \<4;
  • Planned mastectomy surgery, simple mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, mastectomy with sentinel-lymph node biopsy, modified radical mastectomy (unilateral or bilateral);
  • Absence of allergies or hypersensitivity reported and / or documented to drugs used routinely for post-operative analgesia;
  • Absence of inflammatory changes at the surgical site level;
  • Presence of the patient's informed consent to the processing of personal data;

You may not qualify if:

  • Known alterations of coagulation;
  • Known cardiac arrhythmias (atrial sinus block I, II, III type, atrioventricular block I, II and III type);
  • Documented renal failure (patient undergoing renal replacement therapy, or creatininemia ≥ 2 mg / dl);
  • Severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Plugh class III and IV); Seizure states (absences, seizures of large and / or small epileptic disease);
  • Respiratory failure (PaO2 ≤ 60mmHg PaCO2≥ 50mmHg);

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi

Florence, 50100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Gewandter JS, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Fillingim RB, Gilron I, Markman JD, Oaklander AL, Polydefkis MJ, Raja SN, Robinson JP, Woolf CJ, Ziegler D, Ashburn MA, Burke LB, Cowan P, George SZ, Goli V, Graff OX, Iyengar S, Jay GW, Katz J, Kehlet H, Kitt RA, Kopecky EA, Malamut R, McDermott MP, Palmer P, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Steigerwald I, Tobias J, Walco GA. Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2015 Jul;156(7):1184-1197. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000191.

    PMID: 25887465BACKGROUND
  • Kairaluoma PM, Bachmann MS, Korpinen AK, Rosenberg PH, Pere PJ. Single-injection paravertebral block before general anesthesia enhances analgesia after breast cancer surgery with and without associated lymph node biopsy. Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1837-1843. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136775.15566.87.

    PMID: 15562083BACKGROUND
  • Caraceni A, Mendoza TR, Mencaglia E, Baratella C, Edwards K, Forjaz MJ, Martini C, Serlin RC, de Conno F, Cleeland CS. A validation study of an Italian version of the Brief Pain Inventory (Breve Questionario per la Valutazione del Dolore). Pain. 1996 Apr;65(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00156-5.

    PMID: 8826494BACKGROUND
  • Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1374-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

    PMID: 23485231BACKGROUND
  • AIRTUM Working Group. Italian cancer figures, report 2013: Multiple tumours. Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5 Suppl 1):1-152. English, Italian.

    PMID: 24259384BACKGROUND
  • Katz J, Poleshuck EL, Andrus CH, Hogan LA, Jung BF, Kulick DI, Dworkin RH. Risk factors for acute pain and its persistence following breast cancer surgery. Pain. 2005 Dec 15;119(1-3):16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.008. Epub 2005 Nov 17.

    PMID: 16298063BACKGROUND
  • Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011 Jul;12(7):725-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

    PMID: 21435953BACKGROUND
  • Lynch EP, Welch KJ, Carabuena JM, Eberlein TJ. Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves outcome after breast surgery. Ann Surg. 1995 Nov;222(5):663-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199511000-00009.

    PMID: 7487214BACKGROUND
  • Aufforth R, Jain J, Morreale J, Baumgarten R, Falk J, Wesen C. Paravertebral blocks in breast cancer surgery: is there a difference in postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;19(2):548-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1899-5. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

    PMID: 21769470BACKGROUND
  • Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):660-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00008.

    PMID: 17006061BACKGROUND
  • Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):842-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq265. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

    PMID: 20947592BACKGROUND
  • Blanco R. The 'pecs block': a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):847-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06838.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21831090BACKGROUND
  • Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

    PMID: 22939099BACKGROUND
  • Bouzinac A, Tournier JJ, Merouani M, Delbos A. [Sensory blockade and efficiency of the "pec block 2" for postoperative analgesia after breast cancer surgery]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Jan;44(1):98-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 1. No abstract available. French.

    PMID: 25282097BACKGROUND
  • Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/anae.12344. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

    PMID: 23923989BACKGROUND
  • Sopena-Zubiria LA, Fernandez-Mere LA, Valdes Arias C, Munoz Gonzalez F, Sanchez Asheras J, Ibanez Ernandez C. [Thoracic paravertebral block compared to thoracic paravertebral block plus pectoral nerve block in reconstructive breast surgery]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Jan;59(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2011.10.001. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Spanish.

    PMID: 22429631BACKGROUND
  • Langford R, Brown I, Vickery J, Mitchell K, Pritchard C, Creanor S. Study protocol for a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of continuous subpectoral local anaesthetic infusion for pain and shoulder function following mastectomy: SUB-pectoral Local anaesthetic Infusion following MastEctomy (SUBLIME) study. BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 30;4(9):e006318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006318.

    PMID: 25270861BACKGROUND
  • Bashandy GM, Abbas DN. Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):68-74. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000163.

    PMID: 25376971BACKGROUND
  • Villa G, Mandarano R, Scire-Calabrisotto C, Rizzelli V, Del Duca M, Montin DP, Paparella L, De Gaudio AR, Romagnoli S. Chronic pain after breast surgery: incidence, associated factors, and impact on quality of life, an observational prospective study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021 Feb 24;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13741-021-00176-6.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasms

Interventions

Analgesics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensory System AgentsPeripheral Nervous System AgentsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic Uses

Study Officials

  • Carmelo Guido, MD

    Careggi Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2020

First Posted

March 17, 2020

Study Start

September 12, 2016

Primary Completion

July 31, 2018

Study Completion

July 31, 2018

Last Updated

March 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations