Mindfulness- Based Intervention for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients
The Efficacy of Mindfulness- Based Intervention for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): a Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rheumatic autoimmune disease, involving chronic pain, fatigue, movement difficulties, and is often accompanied by tremendous psychological and psychiatric difficulties. Mindfulness-based Intervention (MBI), is a mind-body intervention, which has been documented in several studies as effective among stress- related diseases, such as crohn's disease. Nevertheless, not much is known about the efficiency of MBI among SLE patients and about the mechanisms of change through which MBI works. In the present study, the investigators are focusing on different cognitive mechanisms and their role in MBI action. The study is a randomized-controlled trial. 26 Patients diagnosed with SLE (Mean age=41.26) were randomly assigned to either a 10-weeks MBI intervention (N=15) or a waitlist-control (WL;N=11).4 central measurements points were conducted through the study, which included physiological and psychological variables: at the beginning of the intervention (T1), in the middle of the intervention (T2) at the end of the intervention (T3) and one 6 months follow- up measurement after the termination of the intervention (T4). additionally, participant's blood test has been taken at the beginning and at the end of the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2020
CompletedMarch 12, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.6 years
February 24, 2020
March 10, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire
Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ), to assess self-reported lupus activity . An analog to the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), the SLAQ includes 24 questions related to disease activity in SLE. Items are weighted and aggregated in a manner analogous to the scoring system used in the SLAM, and scores range from 0-44, with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. The SLAQ is highly correlated with physicians' ratings of disease activity, and other health indices, including the Short Form 12 Health Survey physical component summary and the Short Form 36 physical functioning subscale.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
PSS (Perceived Stress Scale)
A widely-used and well-validated 10-item scale that measures the degree to which situations in one's life over the past month are appraised as unpredictable, uncontrollable and overwhelming. It posits that people appraise potentially threatening or challenging events in relation to their available coping resources. Items are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). A higher score indicates a greater degree of perceived stress. The PSS was often found to possess very good psychometric properties.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
PHQ-9 (The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 )
PHQ-9 is a self-administered questionnaire used to assess major depression symptoms, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). It can yield either a continuous score, or a probable major depressive disorder diagnosis using a cut-off of 10. The sensitivity and specificity of the PHQ-9 compare favorably with structured psychiatric interviews and the Cronbach alpha was found to be 0.89 in a sample of primary care patients.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
FFMQ (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire)
FFMQ derived from a factor analysis of questionnaires measuring a trait-like general tendency to be mindful in daily life. It yield five scoring scales that appear to represent elements of mindfulness as it is currently conceptualized: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-judging of inner experience, and non- reactivity to inner experience. FFMQ consists of 39 items, items are rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (never or very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true). The FFMQ has been shown to have good internal consistency and significant relationships in the predicted directions with a variety of constructs related to mindfulness.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
PIPS (Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale)
PIPS is a 12-item scale developed to assess target variables in exposure and acceptance-oriented treatments of chronic pain ("I postpone things because of my pain"). The subscales measure avoidance (eight items) and cognitive fusion (four items). Items can be answered on a 7-point Likert scale (1=never true to 7=always true). The total score ranges from 12 to 84 points. Higher scores indicate greater psychological inflexibility. Studies showed good model fit and internal consistencies.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
PCS (The pain catastrophizing scale)
The PCS is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of 13 items to assess the extent of the patient's catastrophizing thoughts and behaviors. It comprises three subscales: helplessness, magnification, and rumination. The questionnaire is completed in relation to the patient's thoughts and feelings when they are in pain. The scores for the subscales are given by the sum of the corresponding items, and the total score is computed by summation of all items. The PCS score ranges from 0 to 52 points.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
EQ (Experiences Questionnaire)
EQ is a 20-item self-report scale measuring decentering, in which participants rate items on a 7-point Likert-type scale (1 = never to 7 = all the time). It evaluates an individual's ability to decenter, namely, the ability to regard thoughts and feelings as temporary and transient. The EQ focuses on three facets of decentering: the ability to view one's self as separate from one's thoughts, the ability to non-judgmentally observe one's negative experiences without habitually reacting, and the capacity for self-compassion. Multiple studies have demonstrated sound psychometric properties of the EQ.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
BAI (The Beck Anxiety Inventory)
BAI is a 21-item questionnaire that measures cognitive and somatic symptoms of anxiety, with higher scores indicating increased anxiety, (range 0-63). Sample items include "unable to relax" and "heart pounding or racing." Good psychometric properties have been demonstrated among college, medical, and psychiatric samples. The BAI is a 21-item scale that measures cognitive, somatic, and affective symptoms of anxiety.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
BAQ (Body awareness questionnaire)
The 18-item Body Awareness Questionnaire assessed reported attentiveness to normal non-emotive body processes, sensitivity to body cycles/rhythms, ability to detect small changes in normal functioning, and to anticipate bodily reactions ("I am aware of a cycle in my activity level throughout the day", and "I notice specific bodily reactions to being over hungry"). It is a 7-point Likert-type scale (1 = Not at all true of me to 7 = Very true of me). Studies reported good reliability and validity of the BAQ. The total score ranges from 18 to 126 points. Higher scores indicate greater body awareness.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
The WHOQOL-BREF (The World Health Organization Quality of Life)
WHOQOL is an abbreviated 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100, on a scale of 1-5. It contains one general QOL item, one general health item, and 24 specific items-one item from each of the 24 QOL facets of the WHOQOL-100. The 24 specific items cover four broad domains: physical, psychological, social, and environmental quality of life. The items are answered on five-point scales, which assess the intensity, capacity, frequency, and evaluation of QOL facets with respect to the last two weeks. Negatively keyed items are reversely scored, so that higher values indicate better QOL.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
VAS Pain (Visual Analog Scale for Pain)
The VAS pain is a self- report measure continuous scale, comprised of a horizontal line ranged of 0-100. VAS was based on 3 single- item continuous scale, for pain intensity, shame in one's disease and the third measured the levels of how much the disease has taken over the patients identity. The VAS is the most commonly used measure for assessing levels of pain by physicians in medical setting.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
DAI-10 (Drug Attitude Inventory)
The DAI includes a series of 10 questions, each with true/false answers, regarding the adherent of patients to their prescribed medication, and pertaining to various aspects of the patient's perceptions and experiences of treatment. The original scale consists of 30 questions, but a short form consisting of 10 questions has also been validated.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
Home Practice Diary
In order to comprehensively assess mindfulness practice at home, participants would fill out a daily home practice diary, which will include the date, time, type, and duration of both formal and informal mindfulness home practice, along with any comments on their experience. This home practice form is commonly used in MBSR interventions.
Through study completion, an average of 9 month
Study Arms (2)
Mindfulness- Based Intervention (MBI)
EXPERIMENTALIn MBI arm, patients received mindfulness- based intervention, a psychological mind- body intervention, focusing on stress reduction,. the intervention was led by a licensed clinical therapist and mindfulness specialist, who was trained in MBSR at Bangor University.
Wait- List Controls (WL)
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in wait- list control arm received no active treatment during their 10-weeks waiting period. At the end of that period received the exact intervention as the study group.
Interventions
Mindfulness- Based Intervention in a psychological intervention, based on mind- body connection. The protocol includes a 10- weeks program, with weekly group sessions of 2 hours and one all-day session after seven weeks. The intervention have standardized core elements consisting of different mental and physical mindfulness exercises: 1) body-scan exercises (paying close attention to all body parts, from the feet to the head), 2) mental exercises focusing one's attention on breathing, 3) physical exercises with focus on being aware of bodily sensations and one's own limits during the exercises, and 4) practicing being fully aware during everyday activities by using the breath as an anchor for attention. Essential to all parts of the program is developing an accepting and non-reactive attitude to what one experiences in each moment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- confirmation of a clinical diagnosis of Lupus by the patient's own physician
- age 18 years or older
- Hebrew speakers
- physical ability to attend group intervention sessions
- psychological ability to practice mindfulness (no cognitive extreme impairments, no psychosis, no suicidal tendencies)
You may not qualify if:
- serious mental health condition (such as suicidal state, alcohol and drug abuse, schizophrenia)
- serious physical condition that would not enable participation
- participation in another study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, 52621, Israel
Bar- Ilan University
Ramat Gan, 5290002, Israel
Related Publications (16)
Adams SG Jr, Dammers PM, Saia TL, Brantley PJ, Gaydos GR. Stress, depression, and anxiety predict average symptom severity and daily symptom fluctuation in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Behav Med. 1994 Oct;17(5):459-77. doi: 10.1007/BF01857920.
PMID: 7877156BACKGROUNDCervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J, Sebastiani GD, Gil A, Lavilla P, Mejia JC, Aydintug AO, Chwalinska-Sadowska H, de Ramon E, Fernandez-Nebro A, Galeazzi M, Valen M, Mathieu A, Houssiau F, Caro N, Alba P, Ramos-Casals M, Ingelmo M, Hughes GR; European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003 Sep;82(5):299-308. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000091181.93122.55.
PMID: 14530779BACKGROUNDEmmelkamp, P. M., Bouman, T. K., & Blaauw, E. (1994). Individualized versus standardized therapy: A comparative evaluation with obsessive-compulsive patients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1(2), 95-100.
BACKGROUNDEmori A, Matsushima E, Aihara O, Ohta K, Koike R, Miyasaka N, Kato M. Cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005 Oct;59(5):584-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2005.01418.x.
PMID: 16194262BACKGROUNDGlass JM. Review of cognitive dysfunction in fibromyalgia: a convergence on working memory and attentional control impairments. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009 May;35(2):299-311. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.06.002.
PMID: 19647144BACKGROUNDHamburg MA, Collins FS. The path to personalized medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):301-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006304. Epub 2010 Jun 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 20551152BACKGROUNDKazdin AE. Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychother Res. 2009 Jul;19(4-5):418-28. doi: 10.1080/10503300802448899.
PMID: 19034715BACKGROUNDKabat-Zinn J. An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;4(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3.
PMID: 7042457BACKGROUNDKabat-Zinn J, Lipworth L, Burney R. The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. J Behav Med. 1985 Jun;8(2):163-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00845519.
PMID: 3897551BACKGROUNDKarlson EW, Daltroy LH, Rivest C, Ramsey-Goldman R, Wright EA, Partridge AJ, Liang MH, Fortin PR. Validation of a Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) for population studies. Lupus. 2003;12(4):280-6. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu332oa.
PMID: 12729051BACKGROUNDLiang MH, Socher SA, Larson MG, Schur PH. Reliability and validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Sep;32(9):1107-18. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320909.
PMID: 2775320BACKGROUNDMeszaros ZS, Perl A, Faraone SV. Psychiatric symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):993-1001. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07425. Epub 2012 May 1.
PMID: 22687742BACKGROUNDMorone NE, Greco CM, Weiner DK. Mindfulness meditation for the treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: a randomized controlled pilot study. Pain. 2008 Feb;134(3):310-319. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.04.038. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
PMID: 17544212BACKGROUNDSchulte, D., Künzel, R., Pepping, G., & Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1992). Tailor-made versus standardized therapy of phobic patients. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14(2), 67-92.
BACKGROUNDYazdany J, Yelin EH, Panopalis P, Trupin L, Julian L, Katz PP. Validation of the systemic lupus erythematosus activity questionnaire in a large observational cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan 15;59(1):136-43. doi: 10.1002/art.23238.
PMID: 18163398BACKGROUNDWallace DJ. The role of stress and trauma in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Feb;16(3):153-7. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(87)90018-7.
PMID: 3547654BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participant, therapists and outcome assesors are blind to the condition the individual participant was assigned to, by encrypting the names of the individual into a number-letter codes. The therapists led the intervention group was not aware of the participants condition.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior lecturer and head of the Trauma and Stress Research Lab at Bar-Ilan University's Department of Psychology.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2020
First Posted
March 12, 2020
Study Start
January 23, 2017
Primary Completion
September 4, 2018
Study Completion
September 8, 2018
Last Updated
March 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
IPD would be available to other researchers, including Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form, Clinical Study Report and Analytic Code through e- mail or publications.