NCT04304157

Brief Summary

Auxiliary drugs augment the effect of local anesthetic in intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). The purpose of our study was to estimate the median effective dose (ED50) of Dexmedetomidine in elective upper limb Lidocaine 0.5% IVRA.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
81

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2019

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 29, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2020

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 2, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

March 2, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 1. Pain intensity measure

    Patients reported pain intensity at baseline, every 5 minutes during the surgery and every hour for 6 hours after the surgery. Pain intensity scored 0-10 (0 being no pain at all, and 10 the worst pain ever).

    8 hours

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in mean blood pressure in mmHg

    8 h ours

  • changes in heart rate (beat per minute)

    8 hours

Study Arms (2)

satisfactory

EXPERIMENTAL

0.4 µg.kg of dexmedetomidine, with 0.1 µg.kg dose interval. If IVRA outcome was satisfactory, the dose went down for the next patient by 0.1 µg.kg. Vice versa, if the outcome was unsatisfactory, the dexmedetomidine dose was stepped up by 0.1 µg.kg for the following patient

Drug: Dexmedetomidine

unsatisfactory

EXPERIMENTAL

0.4 µg.kg of dexmedetomidine, with 0.1 µg.kg dose interval. If IVRA outcome was satisfactory, the dose went down for the next patient by 0.1 µg.kg. Vice versa, if the outcome was unsatisfactory, the dexmedetomidine dose was stepped up by 0.1 µg.kg for the following patient

Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) a potent α 2 agonist that have unique analgesic, anxiolytic and sedative profile has been called upon as attractive adjunct in general as well as regional anesthesia with enticing results. Several studies have pursued DEX median effective dose (ED50) in different settings e.g., co induction agent with Propofol, in laryngeal muscle insertion and with local anesthetic to enhance the quality of spinal anesthesia

Also known as: dixon's sequential method
satisfactoryunsatisfactory

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged between 18 and 60 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
  • Undergoing minor upper limb orthopedic surgical procedures in the hand, wrist and forearms including: metacarpal fracture, tendon injury, and carpal tunnel release.

You may not qualify if:

  • Allergy to test drugs.
  • vascular disease.
  • contraindication to tourniquet applications.
  • difficulty to manipulate the surgical limb.
  • surgery expected to last more than an hour.
  • patient refusal

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

South Valley University

Qina, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Gad s Gad, MD

    South Valley University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2020

First Posted

March 11, 2020

Study Start

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 29, 2020

Study Completion

March 1, 2020

Last Updated

March 11, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations