Unilateral Attachment Versus Tooth Implant Supported Bridge
Attachment-retained Unilateral Partial Denture Versus Tooth Implant Supported Prosthesis in Mandibular Distal Extension Cases
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: Evaluation of patients' satisfaction, biting force measurement and radiographic evaluation of abutment teeth of tooth implant supported bridge, unilateral attachment and conventional partial denture in mandibular distal extension cases. Materials and methods: Twenty four patients were selected and divided into three equal groups, each of eight patients: patients of group I Patients received a fixed tooth implant supported bridge, patients of group II Patients received a removable unilateral attachment partial denture and group III Patients received a conventional removable partial denture.Evaluation included patient satisfaction and biting force measurement radiographic evaluation of terminal abutments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2020
CompletedMarch 10, 2020
March 1, 2020
1.6 years
March 2, 2020
March 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
patient satisfaction
questionnaires
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
biting force
1 month
radiographic evaluation
1 month
Study Arms (3)
conventional group
ACTIVE COMPARATORconventional partial denture
attachment group
EXPERIMENTALunlateral attachment retained partial denture
tooth implant supporeted prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALtooth implant supported bridge
Interventions
conventional metalic partial denture
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral mandibular distal extension area
- The abutments showed sufficient occluso-gingival height of its clinical crown
- Adequate inter-arch space and no tempro-mandibular joint disorders.
- No para-functional habits,
- Full opposing arch or restored with acceptable fixed restoration
- Minimal bone height11 mm at the lower second molar area.
You may not qualify if:
- \*Insufficent bone height in posterior area of mandible
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Cairo University
Cairo, 11511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
samira Ibrahim, prof
professor of prosthodontics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of prosthodontics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2020
First Posted
March 10, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
September 20, 2019
Study Completion
October 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share