Occlusion and Disocclusion Time in Immediately Loaded Overdentures Supported by Two Splinted Versus Non Splinted Interforaminal Implants
Evaluation of Occlusion and Disocclusion Time in Immediately Loaded Implant Supported Overdentures Supported by Two Splinted Versus Non Splinted Interforaminal Implants
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
complete denture wearers struggle to eat well with their dentures due to poor denture retention, stability, and occlusal disharmony. So, the current study protocol aims to compare the occlusion/ disocclusion time in immediately loaded implant retained overdentures supported by two interforaminal implants; splinted versus non splinted dental implants compared to the conventional complete denture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2024
CompletedAugust 7, 2025
August 1, 2025
4 months
April 17, 2024
August 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of occlusion/disocclusion time
occlusion/disocclusion time will be evaluated using a T scan device
3 months
Study Arms (3)
group CD (conventional complete denture group)
PLACEBO COMPARATORpatients will receive a conventional complete denture with no implant placement
group IB (implant-supported overdenture with ball attachment)
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients will receive an implant-supported overdenture with ball attachment. The overdenture will be relined by a soft liner.
group II (implant-supported overdenture with an intraoral welded bar)
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients will receive an implant-supported overdenture with an intraoral welded bar. The overdenture will be relined by a soft liner.
Interventions
ball attachment will be attached to the dental implant on the day of implant placement
Titanium bar will be welded to the dental implant on the day of implant placement
Mucosa supported conventional complete denture will be fabricated without supporting implants
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- completely edentulous patients
- non-smokers
- good oral hygiene
- motivated patients
You may not qualify if:
- major systemic diseases that may affect osseointegration as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- the need for extensive bone grafting in planned implant site
- pregnancy
- patients under bisphosphonate treatment
- limited mouth-opening for executing the implant surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University
Cairo, 11361, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed MA Mohamed, BDS MSc MD
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- the statistician will be the only one to be blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professor of oral and maxillofacial prosthodontics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2024
First Posted
April 19, 2024
Study Start
April 25, 2024
Primary Completion
August 15, 2024
Study Completion
September 15, 2024
Last Updated
August 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08