NCT04299386

Brief Summary

Dental implants are a well-accepted treatment for replacing missing teeth, due to excellent patient satisfaction regarding function, aesthetics, and comfort, as well as their long-term survival. However, the accumulation of bacterial biofilm on implants changes their surface biocompatibility and initiates peri-implant diseases, such as peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Professional cleaning of the implant surface is necessary to remove the biofilm and facilitate healing within the surrounding tissue. Prophylaxis pastes can be used in dental clinics to assist the mechanical removal of biofilm by dental professionals. However, these pastes can contain abrasives that detrimentally affect the surface stability and chemical properties of the implant surfaces. ImplanTreat® and Neophylaxis® are novel nanocrystal gels designed for implants' professional cleaning, under surgical and non-surgical procedures respectively. These products present high biocompatibility proprieties that can improve peri-implant bone healing. Moreover, they don't contain abrasives, or fluoride, which preserves the implant surfaces. The researchers hypothesize that professional implant cleaning with Neophylaxis® or ImplanTreat® results in a greater reduction of peri-implant inflammation and dental plaque accumulation in comparison to cleaning without any product. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to verify if Neophylaxis® and ImplanTreat® enhance the efficacy of professional cleaning and preserve implant surface roughness. The researchers will randomly divide the recruited participant into two groups depending on the clinical diagnosis, each patient will be either recruited in peri-implant mucositis group (Group I), or in peri-implantitis group (Group II). Each patient in the group I will be assigned randomly to receive either implant cleaning with Neophylaxis® or cleaning without. Similarly, each patient in group II will be assigned randomly to receive either implant cleaning with ImplanTreat® or cleaning without. No participant will be aware of his allocation before the end of data collection. In each evaluation session, The researchers will examine the participants' implants and evaluate the removal of biofilm as well as the improvement of the peri-implant tissue health and bone level. The researchers will then analyze and compare the results obtained from each study group.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
390

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2020

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 5, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

March 1, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Dental implantsInfection controlBone Healingprofessional cleaning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Bleeding on probing index

    semi-quantitative assessment of bleeding after probing around each implant 0 = No bleeding 1. Isolated minimal bleeding spots 2. Blood forming a confluent red line on the margin 3. Heavy or profuse bleeding

    4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

  • Change in Probing depth (PD)

    probing depth in mm of peri-implant tissues around each implant

    4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Modified Gingival Index

    4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

  • modified plaque index

    4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

  • gingival suppuration after probing

    4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

  • Crestal bone level (CBL)

    6 months, 1 year

Study Arms (4)

NeoPhylaxis

EXPERIMENTAL

Nanocrystalline gel for nonsurgical cleaning of implants

Device: NeoPhylaxis

ImplanTreat

EXPERIMENTAL

Nanocrystalline gel for surgical cleaning of Implants

Device: ImplanTreat

Nonsurgical cleaning without gel

NO INTERVENTION

Cleaning dental implants non-surgically using the electric brush without the gel

Surgical cleaning without gel

NO INTERVENTION

Cleaning dental implants surgically using the electric brush without the gel

Interventions

NeoPhylaxis® gel is designed for the non-surgical decontamination of the implant surface and can be used for professional regular implant maintenance, with or without peri-implant mucositis. It contains the same ingredients, Magnesium Phosphate (3.02% w/v) and Sodium Phosphate (8.23% w/v) in 3 mL syringe in non-sterile form.

NeoPhylaxis

ImplanTreat® gel can be used for the surgical decontamination of the implant surface and can be used to decontaminate implants with peri-implantitis. It contains the same ingredients, Magnesium Phosphate (3.02% w/v) and Sodium Phosphate (8.23% w/v) in 3 mL syringe in sterile form.

ImplanTreat

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female patients aged 18 years and older.
  • Patients with upper or lower implant-supported/retained prostheses.
  • The implant should be in function for 12 months or more.
  • To be included in group I, peri-implant mucositis should be diagnosed.
  • To be included in group II, peri-implantitis should be diagnosed.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have undergone radiotherapy in the head and neck region, chemotherapy or systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment;
  • Patients receiving medications known to induce gingival hyperplasia;
  • Patients who have taken systemic antibiotics less than 3 months prior to baseline;
  • Patients with prosthetic factors that prevent clinical measurements
  • Implants with technical complications, such as poor marginal contour or any type of prosthetic complication that would be a local contributing factor to chronic inflammation.
  • Peri-implant bone loss 50% \[47\]
  • Presence of any acute oral infection.
  • Presence of uncontrolled diabetes or other systemic diseases.
  • Intravenous bisphosphonates
  • Oral bisphosphonate intake for more than 3 years.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Robert Durand

    Université de Montréal

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Robert Durand, DMD, MS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Double-masked parallel-arm randomized clinical trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2020

First Posted

March 6, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion

July 1, 2024

Study Completion

July 1, 2024

Last Updated

July 5, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07