A Study Based on Data From German Sick Funds That Looks at the Costs of Treatment of Type-2 Diabetic Patients With Empagliflozin vs. DPP-4 Inhibitors vs. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
The Empagliflozin vs. DPP-4 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Cost of Care Study: a German Claims Data Analysis
1 other identifier
observational
24,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Empagliflozin vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1-RA) Cost of Care Study: a German claims data analysis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 30, 2024
CompletedAugust 30, 2024
April 1, 2024
11 months
March 3, 2020
September 26, 2022
April 8, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Direct Healthcare Cost
The direct healthcare cost is reported, including inpatient cost, outpatient cost, medication cost, and total cost. Patients starting Empagliflozin (EMPA) versus either Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), Sitagliptin (SITA) or Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA) were matched 1:1 based on a propensity score using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm without replacement and a maximum caliper of 0.001. The propensity scores were derived by logistic regression models estimating the probability of a patient belonging to the different treatment groups (three estimations: EMPA versus DPP-4i, EMPA versus SITA, and EMPA versus GLP-1-RA). The cost per observed patient year is calculated as the sum of the cost/ sum of the observed time \[year\] over all patients. Final values were rounded to the nearest digit.
Dataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.
Healthcare Resource Utilization
Healthcare resource utilization includes hospitalizations, hospital stays. outpatient visits, and rehabilitation stays.
Dataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Indirect Healthcare Costs (Including Indirect Costs of Days Absent From Work)
Dataset included all adult persons, who were continuously insured between 01 january 2014 until 31 december 2018 (except for death), approximately a 4 year period.
Study Arms (3)
All patients who started an Empagliflozin therapy
All participants who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria of this study, who had at least two outpatient diagnoses and/or one inpatient diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and received at least one outpatient prescription with Empagliflozin (EMPA) between 2015 - 2018 from the Gesellschaft für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit bei Krankenkassen (GWQ) dataset.
All patients who started a DPP-4 inhibitor (specifically Sitagliptin) therapy
All participants who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria of this study, who had at least two outpatient diagnoses and/or one inpatient diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and received at least one outpatient prescription with Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor (DPP-4i) (specifically Sitagliptin) between 2015 - 2018 from the Gesellschaft für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit bei Krankenkassen (GWQ) dataset.
All patients who started a GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy
All participants who met the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria of this study, who had at least two outpatient diagnoses and/or one inpatient diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and received at least one outpatient prescription with Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA) between 2015 - 2018 from the Gesellschaft für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit bei Krankenkassen (GWQ) dataset.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients who have been treated with either Empagliflozin, DPP-4i /Sitagliptin or GLP-1-RA (new users only, at least one prescription).
You may qualify if:
- Continuous insurance by the sickness fund for the entire period (01/01/2014 - 31/12/2018; death of a patient is the only accepted exception from this rule)
- At least two outpatient T2DM diagnoses (ICD E11.-) in two different quarters and/or at least one inpatient T2DM diagnosis (ICD E11.-) in the period 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2016, but before or on index date (i.e. first Empagliflozin or DPP-4i /Sitagliptin prescription).
You may not qualify if:
- At least one prescription of a sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i), DPP-4i or GLP-1-RA in the baseline period (01/01/2014 - 31/12/2014)
- During follow-up, patients will be censored if they switch to any SGLT-2i, DPP-4i or GLP-1-RA or initiate a concomitant use of any SGLT-2i, DPP-4i or GLP-1-RA (free or fixed-dose combinations).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Boehringer Ingelheim
Ingelheim, 55216, Germany
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Relevant data for the outcome measure were not collected in the GMQ dataset. The general reason for missing data in GWQ´s dataset is insufficient data quality. First, coding-quality of out-patient diagnoses in Germany is heterogenous and generally low. Second, data from GWQ´s individual sickness funds highly differ in size, structure, and quality of specific items. Due to this, GWQ´s quality assurance decided not to integrate several sub-datasets into GWQ´s dataset.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center
- Organization
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2020
First Posted
March 4, 2020
Study Start
November 16, 2020
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
August 30, 2024
Results First Posted
August 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization). For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency