Study Stopped
Terminated due to non-safety reasons
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Isatuximab in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation
A Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation
3 other identifiers
interventional
23
2 countries
6
Brief Summary
Primary Objectives:
- Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in kidney transplant candidates.
- Phase 2: To evaluate the efficacy of isatuximab in desensitization of participants awaiting kidney transplantation. Secondary Objectives:
- Phase 2: To characterize the safety profile of isatuximab in kidney transplant candidates.
- To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab in kidney transplant candidates.
- To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab.
- To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in desensitization of participants awaiting kidney transplantation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jun 2020
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 18, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 30, 2023
CompletedSeptember 17, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.9 years
February 19, 2020
May 1, 2023
September 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study drug until study cut-off date).
From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)
Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities
Abnormal hematological parameters assessed were anemia, platelet count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased and monocytes. The hematological abnormality grades were based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Monocytes were assessed as per potentially clinically significant abnormality (PCSA) criteria defined as: greater than (\>) 0.7\*10\^9/L.
From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)
Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities
Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine increased and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). The renal function abnormality grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. eGFR was assessed as per PCSA criteria: 60 (less than equal to) \<= to less than (\<) 90 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) (Mild), 30\<= to \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Moderate), 15\<=to \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Severe), \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (End Stage Renal Disease).
From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolytes Parameters
Abnormal electrolyte parameters assessed were hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, blood bicarbonate decreased, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia and chloride. The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Chloride was estimated as per PCSA criteria: \<80 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) and \>115 mmol/L.
From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Metabolism Parameters
Abnormal metabolism parameters assessed were hypoglycemia, hypoalbuminemia and glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c). The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. HbA1c was estimated as per PCSA criteria: \>8%.
From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)
Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities
Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, and Total bilirubin (TB) increased. The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Response
Response was defined as the percentage of participants meeting at least one of the predefined desensitization efficacy criteria as measured by single antigen bead (SAB) assay as follows: reduction in cPRA resulting in at least 100% increase of likelihood of finding a compatible donor; reduction in antibody titer (\>=75% reduction from Baseline) to achieve target cPRA; elimination of \>=1 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (i.e., mean fluorescence intensity \[MFI\] reduced to \<2000) as measured by a SAB assay, for antibodies with Baseline MFI \>=3000.
From first dose of study drug until end of follow-up period (maximum duration: up to 39.1 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters: Concentration Observed at the End of First Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab
At End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1
PK Parameters: Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1
PK Parameters: Time Taken to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1
PK Parameters: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1
PK Parameters: Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) \>=99.90% (indicating active candidates on kidney transplant waitlist) received isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), intravenous (IV) infusion, once weekly (QW) for 4 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22 of Cycle 1) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for subsequent treatment cycles (each cycle of 28 days) until unacceptable adverse events (AEs) or participant's decision to stop the treatment (maximum treatment duration: 13 weeks).
Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with cPRA between 80.00% to 99.89% (indicating active candidates on kidney transplant waitlist with no living donor cleared for donation) received isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, QW for 4 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22 of Cycle 1) and then Q2W for subsequent treatment cycles (each cycle of 28 days) until unacceptable AEs or participant's decision to stop the treatment (maximum treatment duration: 13 weeks).
Interventions
Pharmaceutical form: Solution for infusion Route of administration: Intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: Tablets Route of administration: Oral
Pharmaceutical form: Solution Route of administration: Intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: Solution Route of administration: Intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: Solution Route of administration: Intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: Tablets Route of administration: Oral
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and active candidate on the kidney donor waitlist at the time of screening.
- Body mass index (BMI) \</=40 kg/m\^2.
- Contraceptive use by men or women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies.
- Capable of giving signed informed consent.
- For Participants in Cohort A: active candidates on the kidney waitlist with living donor.
- For Participants in Cohort B: active candidates on the kidney waitlist with no living donor cleared for donation.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant cardiac dysfunction.
- Known active, recurrent, or chronic infection.
- Active lupus or uncontrolled diabetes.
- Prior treatment with rituximab within 6 months from SAR650984 administration.
- Inadequate organ and bone marrow function at screening.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women who intend to become pregnant during participation in the study.
- Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to any component of SAR650984 or pre-medications.
- Participants who were not suitable for participation as judged by the Investigator.
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanofilead
Study Sites (6)
Investigational Site Number :8400003
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Investigational Site Number :8400001
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Investigational Site Number :8400002
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Investigational Site Number :8400004
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Investigational Site Number :7240002
Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08035, Spain
Investigational Site Number :7240001
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña], 08907, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Mannon RB, Vincenti FG. Poised for Innovation: Considerations for End Points for New Drug Development in Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Nov 1;35(11):1603-1606. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000475. Epub 2024 Aug 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 39102302DERIVEDVincenti F, Bestard O, Brar A, Cruzado JM, Seron D, Gaber AO, Ali N, Tambur AR, Lee H, Abbadessa G, Paul JA, Dudek M, Siegel RJ, Torija A, Semiond D, Lepine L, Ternes N, Montgomery RA, Stegall M. Isatuximab Monotherapy for Desensitization in Highly Sensitized Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplant. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Mar 1;35(3):347-360. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000287. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
PMID: 38147137DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Sponsor decided to terminate the study for non-safety reasons on 02 May 2022. Based on available clinical data at time of interim analysis, it was determined that enrollment of the remaining participants was unlikely to have any significant impact on the study results and hence the trial was stopped. All 23 participants enrolled in the study were followed-up per protocol until the planned study termination date.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Trial Transparency Team
- Organization
- Sanofi Aventis Recherche & Développement
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Sciences & Operations
Sanofi
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2020
First Posted
March 4, 2020
Study Start
June 18, 2020
Primary Completion
May 2, 2022
Study Completion
May 2, 2022
Last Updated
September 17, 2025
Results First Posted
May 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org