NCT04294459

Brief Summary

Primary Objectives:

  • Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in kidney transplant candidates.
  • Phase 2: To evaluate the efficacy of isatuximab in desensitization of participants awaiting kidney transplantation. Secondary Objectives:
  • Phase 2: To characterize the safety profile of isatuximab in kidney transplant candidates.
  • To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab in kidney transplant candidates.
  • To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab.
  • To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in desensitization of participants awaiting kidney transplantation.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Geographic Reach
2 countries

6 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 19, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 4, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 18, 2020

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 2, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 2, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 17, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

February 19, 2020

Results QC Date

May 1, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study drug until study cut-off date).

    From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

  • Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities

    Abnormal hematological parameters assessed were anemia, platelet count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased and monocytes. The hematological abnormality grades were based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Monocytes were assessed as per potentially clinically significant abnormality (PCSA) criteria defined as: greater than (\>) 0.7\*10\^9/L.

    From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

  • Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities

    Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine increased and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). The renal function abnormality grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. eGFR was assessed as per PCSA criteria: 60 (less than equal to) \<= to less than (\<) 90 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) (Mild), 30\<= to \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Moderate), 15\<=to \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (Severe), \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 (End Stage Renal Disease).

    From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolytes Parameters

    Abnormal electrolyte parameters assessed were hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, blood bicarbonate decreased, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia and chloride. The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Chloride was estimated as per PCSA criteria: \<80 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) and \>115 mmol/L.

    From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Metabolism Parameters

    Abnormal metabolism parameters assessed were hypoglycemia, hypoalbuminemia and glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c). The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. HbA1c was estimated as per PCSA criteria: \>8%.

    From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

  • Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities

    Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, and Total bilirubin (TB) increased. The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.

    From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

  • Percentage of Participants With Response

    Response was defined as the percentage of participants meeting at least one of the predefined desensitization efficacy criteria as measured by single antigen bead (SAB) assay as follows: reduction in cPRA resulting in at least 100% increase of likelihood of finding a compatible donor; reduction in antibody titer (\>=75% reduction from Baseline) to achieve target cPRA; elimination of \>=1 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (i.e., mean fluorescence intensity \[MFI\] reduced to \<2000) as measured by a SAB assay, for antibodies with Baseline MFI \>=3000.

    From first dose of study drug until end of follow-up period (maximum duration: up to 39.1 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters: Concentration Observed at the End of First Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab

    At End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1

  • PK Parameters: Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

    At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

  • PK Parameters: Time Taken to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

    At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

  • PK Parameters: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

    At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

  • PK Parameters: Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab

    At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) \>=99.90% (indicating active candidates on kidney transplant waitlist) received isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), intravenous (IV) infusion, once weekly (QW) for 4 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22 of Cycle 1) and then every 2 weeks (Q2W) for subsequent treatment cycles (each cycle of 28 days) until unacceptable adverse events (AEs) or participant's decision to stop the treatment (maximum treatment duration: 13 weeks).

Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984Drug: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) or equivalentDrug: Ranitidine or equivalentDrug: Diphenhydramine or equivalentDrug: Methylprednisolone or equivalentDrug: Montelukast or equivalent

Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants with cPRA between 80.00% to 99.89% (indicating active candidates on kidney transplant waitlist with no living donor cleared for donation) received isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, QW for 4 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 22 of Cycle 1) and then Q2W for subsequent treatment cycles (each cycle of 28 days) until unacceptable AEs or participant's decision to stop the treatment (maximum treatment duration: 13 weeks).

Drug: Isatuximab SAR650984Drug: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) or equivalentDrug: Ranitidine or equivalentDrug: Diphenhydramine or equivalentDrug: Methylprednisolone or equivalentDrug: Montelukast or equivalent

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: Solution for infusion Route of administration: Intravenous

Also known as: Sarclisa
Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%

Pharmaceutical form: Tablets Route of administration: Oral

Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%

Pharmaceutical form: Solution Route of administration: Intravenous

Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%

Pharmaceutical form: Solution Route of administration: Intravenous

Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%

Pharmaceutical form: Solution Route of administration: Intravenous

Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%

Pharmaceutical form: Tablets Route of administration: Oral

Cohort A: Participants with cPRA >=99.90%Cohort B: Participants with cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and active candidate on the kidney donor waitlist at the time of screening.
  • Body mass index (BMI) \</=40 kg/m\^2.
  • Contraceptive use by men or women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent.
  • For Participants in Cohort A: active candidates on the kidney waitlist with living donor.
  • For Participants in Cohort B: active candidates on the kidney waitlist with no living donor cleared for donation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant cardiac dysfunction.
  • Known active, recurrent, or chronic infection.
  • Active lupus or uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Prior treatment with rituximab within 6 months from SAR650984 administration.
  • Inadequate organ and bone marrow function at screening.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women who intend to become pregnant during participation in the study.
  • Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to any component of SAR650984 or pre-medications.
  • Participants who were not suitable for participation as judged by the Investigator.
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Investigational Site Number :8400003

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

Location

Investigational Site Number :8400001

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Investigational Site Number :8400002

New York, New York, 10016, United States

Location

Investigational Site Number :8400004

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Investigational Site Number :7240002

Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08035, Spain

Location

Investigational Site Number :7240001

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña], 08907, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Mannon RB, Vincenti FG. Poised for Innovation: Considerations for End Points for New Drug Development in Kidney Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Nov 1;35(11):1603-1606. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000475. Epub 2024 Aug 5. No abstract available.

  • Vincenti F, Bestard O, Brar A, Cruzado JM, Seron D, Gaber AO, Ali N, Tambur AR, Lee H, Abbadessa G, Paul JA, Dudek M, Siegel RJ, Torija A, Semiond D, Lepine L, Ternes N, Montgomery RA, Stegall M. Isatuximab Monotherapy for Desensitization in Highly Sensitized Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplant. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Mar 1;35(3):347-360. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000287. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Immune System Diseases

Interventions

isatuximabAcetaminophenRanitidineDiphenhydramineMethylprednisolonemontelukast

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesFuransHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsEthylaminesBenzhydryl CompoundsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPrednisolonePregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

Sponsor decided to terminate the study for non-safety reasons on 02 May 2022. Based on available clinical data at time of interim analysis, it was determined that enrollment of the remaining participants was unlikely to have any significant impact on the study results and hence the trial was stopped. All 23 participants enrolled in the study were followed-up per protocol until the planned study termination date.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Trial Transparency Team
Organization
Sanofi Aventis Recherche & Développement

Study Officials

  • Clinical Sciences & Operations

    Sanofi

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2020

First Posted

March 4, 2020

Study Start

June 18, 2020

Primary Completion

May 2, 2022

Study Completion

May 2, 2022

Last Updated

September 17, 2025

Results First Posted

May 30, 2023

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Locations