Heated Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary Molars
Randomized Clinical Trial of Heated High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 12 Months Follow Up
1 other identifier
interventional
88
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of heated in the clinical success of proximal high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in primary molars. Material \& Method: This randomized, split mouth, multicenter study was performed in four different centers including 88 patients aged between 5-7 years old. Selection criteria included clinically and/or radiographically detected proximal caries extending into the dentin tissue. A total of 250 primary molars were restored with a bulk fill GIC (Equia Forte, GC, Europe) and randomly allocated to one of the following groups: 1) non-heated (n = 125) and 2) heated (n = 125). LED light (GC- D-Light DUO, Tokyo Japan) was used at standard mode 1200 mW/cm2, at 50-60 ºC, for 60 sec for heat application. All restorations were clinically evaluated using modified USPHS criteria at the baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Chi-square test, Fisher's Exact Chi-square test, Continuity (Yates) correction, Fisher Freeman Halton test and Mc Nemar test were used to compare qualitative data with descriptive statistical methods (frequency). Kaplan Meier and Life Tables were used for survival analysis. P value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2015
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2020
CompletedMarch 2, 2020
February 1, 2020
8 months
February 17, 2020
February 28, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical success assessment measurement
All restorations were evaluated by using Modified US Public Health Service criteria (modified USPHS criteria). Marginal Integrity (MI)), Marginal Discoloration (MD), Secondary Caries (SC), Anatomic Form (AF), and retention (R) were evaluated. A restoration was considered a failure when codes Charlie (C) and D (Delta) were registered. Codes A (Alpha) and B (Bravo) was considered a success or acceptable. follow up period was baseline, 6th months, 12th months.
12 months.
Study Arms (2)
Non-Heated Arm
EXPERIMENTALProximal cavities were restored with Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Europe) according to manufacturer's orders.
Heated Arm
EXPERIMENTALTeeth were restored as same protocole with non-Heated Group. LED light (GC- D-Light DUO) was used at standard mode 1200 mW/cm2, at 50-60 ºC, for 60 sec.
Interventions
Teeth were restored as same protocole with non-Heated Group. LED light (GC- D-Light DUO) was used at standard mode 1200 mW/cm2, at 50-60 ºC, for 60 sec.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is mentally and systemically healthy
- Subject has at least two approximal carious lesions at both sides of jaws
- Subject has a normal occlusal relationship with natural dentition
- Subject has at least one adjacent tooth contact
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has history of bruxism,
- Subject has allergies to ingredients of glass ionomer based restorative materials.
- Cavity/Caries has highly mineralized pigmented lesions, hypoplasia, fracture or cracks,
- Subject has abrasion, erosion, abfraction,
- Subject has fistula, abscess or pathological mobility,
- Subject has pain, pulp exposure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 17, 2020
First Posted
March 2, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02