NCT04291872

Brief Summary

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of heated in the clinical success of proximal high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in primary molars. Material \& Method: This randomized, split mouth, multicenter study was performed in four different centers including 88 patients aged between 5-7 years old. Selection criteria included clinically and/or radiographically detected proximal caries extending into the dentin tissue. A total of 250 primary molars were restored with a bulk fill GIC (Equia Forte, GC, Europe) and randomly allocated to one of the following groups: 1) non-heated (n = 125) and 2) heated (n = 125). LED light (GC- D-Light DUO, Tokyo Japan) was used at standard mode 1200 mW/cm2, at 50-60 ºC, for 60 sec for heat application. All restorations were clinically evaluated using modified USPHS criteria at the baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Chi-square test, Fisher's Exact Chi-square test, Continuity (Yates) correction, Fisher Freeman Halton test and Mc Nemar test were used to compare qualitative data with descriptive statistical methods (frequency). Kaplan Meier and Life Tables were used for survival analysis. P value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2015

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2017

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 17, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 28, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical success assessment measurement

    All restorations were evaluated by using Modified US Public Health Service criteria (modified USPHS criteria). Marginal Integrity (MI)), Marginal Discoloration (MD), Secondary Caries (SC), Anatomic Form (AF), and retention (R) were evaluated. A restoration was considered a failure when codes Charlie (C) and D (Delta) were registered. Codes A (Alpha) and B (Bravo) was considered a success or acceptable. follow up period was baseline, 6th months, 12th months.

    12 months.

Study Arms (2)

Non-Heated Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Proximal cavities were restored with Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Europe) according to manufacturer's orders.

Other: Glass -Ionomer Cement with /without Led Light Cure

Heated Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Teeth were restored as same protocole with non-Heated Group. LED light (GC- D-Light DUO) was used at standard mode 1200 mW/cm2, at 50-60 ºC, for 60 sec.

Other: Glass -Ionomer Cement with /without Led Light Cure

Interventions

Teeth were restored as same protocole with non-Heated Group. LED light (GC- D-Light DUO) was used at standard mode 1200 mW/cm2, at 50-60 ºC, for 60 sec.

Heated ArmNon-Heated Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 7 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is mentally and systemically healthy
  • Subject has at least two approximal carious lesions at both sides of jaws
  • Subject has a normal occlusal relationship with natural dentition
  • Subject has at least one adjacent tooth contact

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has history of bruxism,
  • Subject has allergies to ingredients of glass ionomer based restorative materials.
  • Cavity/Caries has highly mineralized pigmented lesions, hypoplasia, fracture or cracks,
  • Subject has abrasion, erosion, abfraction,
  • Subject has fistula, abscess or pathological mobility,
  • Subject has pain, pulp exposure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Interventions

Glass Ionomer Cements

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental CementsDental MaterialsBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomised Control
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2020

First Posted

March 2, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion

August 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2017

Last Updated

March 2, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02